Can a key boreal Calanus copepod species now complete its life-cycle in the Arctic? Evidence and implications for Arctic food-webs

The changing Arctic environment is affecting zooplankton that support its abundant wildlife. We examined how these changes are influencing a key zooplankton species, Calanus finmarchicus, principally found in the North Atlantic but expatriated to the Arctic. Close to the ice-edge in the Fram Strait, we identified areas that, since the 1980s, are increasingly favourable to C. finmarchicus. Field-sampling revealed part of the population there to be capable of amassing enough reserves to overwinter. Early developmental stages were also present in early summer, suggesting successful local recruitment. This extension to suitable C. finmarchicus habitat is most likely facilitated by the long-term retreat of the ice-edge, allowing phytoplankton to bloom earlier and for longer and through higher temperatures increasing copepod developmental rates. The increased capacity for this species to complete its life-cycle and prosper in the Fram Strait can change community structure, with large consequences to regional food-webs.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13280-021-01667-y.     

Disaster studies inside out

Disaster studies is faced with a fascinating anomaly: frequently it claims to be critical and innovative, as suggested by the so‐called vulnerability paradigm that emerged more than 40 years ago, yet often it is perpetuating some of the core and problematic tenets of the hazard paradigm that we were asked to challenge initially. This paper interrogates why such an anomaly persists. In so doing, it employs Antonio Gramsci's concept of hegemony to unpack why disaster studies is still dominated by Western epistemologies and scholars that perpetuate an orientalist view of disasters. Ultimately, it suggests a research agenda for the 40 years to come, which builds on the importance of local researchers analysing local disasters using local epistemologies, especially in the non‐Western world. Such subaltern disaster studies are to be fuelled by increasing consciousness of the need to resist the hegemony of Western scholarship and to relocate disaster studies within the realm of its original political agenda.     

Flows through forest canopies in complex terrain

Recent progress on boundary layer flow within and above tall forest canopies in complex terrain is reviewed from the perspective of developing methods to interpret carbon dioxide fluxes from tower measurements in real terrain. Two examples of complex terrain are considered in detail: a forest edge, which exemplifies nonuniform forests, and hilly terrain, which can lead to drainage currents at night. Dynamical arguments show that, when boundary layer winds approach a forest edge, the mean wind adjusts on a length scale of approximately 3L(c), where L(c) is the canopy drag length scale, which depends inversely on the leaf area density of the forest. Over a further distance that also scales on L(c), turbulence in the flow adjusts, and the mixing and transport in the canopy approaches the homogeneous limit. Even low hills change the neutral flow within and above the forest canopy substantially. When the canopy is tall, pressure gradients drive flow up both the upwind and downwind slopes of the hill, leading to an ejection of air out of the top of the canopy just downwind of the crest. This flow at the crest can then advect scalar out of the top of the forest, leading to large variations in the flux of scalar across the hill. At night, when the air near the ground cools and becomes stably stratified, turbulence within the canopy can collapse, even when the flow above the canopy remains turbulent. This leads to a decoupling of the air motions within the canopy from those above. The air above the canopy can then continue to pass up and over the hill, as it does in the neutral case, but at the same time, air within the canopy drains down the hill slopes as drainage currents. These analyses will help us understand when flux towers are reliably measuring the net ecosystem exchange and suggest ways of correcting the flux tower data in more complex situations.