HPLC法测定烟叶和烟田土壤中盐酸吗啉胍残留

采用HPLC法测定烟叶和烟田土壤样品中盐酸吗啉胍的残留,通过对样品前处理条件和仪器测定条件进行优化,使该方法在0.100 mg/L~10.0 mg/L范围内线性良好。烟田土壤、鲜烟叶、烤后烟叶中盐酸吗啉胍的方法检出限分别为32.1μg/kg、22.9μg/kg、46.5μg/kg,空白样品3个质量比水平的加标回收率为79.4%~93.8%,RSD为5.7%~12.3%。将该方法用于研究盐酸吗啉胍在烟叶和烟田土壤中的消解动态,得知盐酸吗啉胍在烟叶中的消解半衰期为24.76 d~27.73 d,在烟田土壤中为13.41 d~16.23 d。     

ASE萃取-GPC净化-HPLC法测定土壤中阿特拉津

以二氯甲烷-丙酮（体积比1∶1）为混合溶剂,用加速溶剂萃取仪萃取土壤样品中的阿特拉津,提取液通过凝胶渗透色谱净化,用高效液相色谱仪在220 nm波长下测定,试验表明,在0．05 mg/L～5．00 mg/L范围内线性良好。方法检出限为0．22μg/kg,对空白土壤进行加标回收,平行测定6次,平均回收率为88．2％～102％,RSD为4．5％～7．6％,符合农药残留分析的要求。     

固相萃取-高效液相色谱法同时测定饮用水中苯胺和联苯胺

用Waters Oasis MCX固相萃取小柱富集水中的苯胺和联苯胺,以2%氨水-甲醇混合溶液为洗脱液,采用高效液相色谱法DAD检测器在285 nm波长下测定。苯胺和联苯胺分别在0 mg/L～100 mg/L和0 mg/L～10.0 mg/L范围内线性良好,检出限分别为0.3 μg/L和0.1 μg/L,饮用水加标平行测定6次的RSD分别为0.9%和0.3%,回收率分别为98.3%～99.1%和97.6%～102%。     

南宁城市内河水体和表层沉积物中多环芳烃分布特征

采用改进的固相萃取、加速溶剂萃取和高效液相色谱对南宁7条城市内河的水体和表层沉积物样品中6种多环芳烃的残留状况进行了分析测定。检测结果表明,水体中多环芳烃以荧蒽为主,6种多环芳烃在水体中的总残留浓度为26.8～163 ng/L,内河水体各点位苯并[α]芘均超过我国地表水环境质量标准限值,对干流水质存在一定影响。7个点位沉积物中多环芳烃总含量为118.06～416.73μg/kg,6种多环芳烃均有检出。     

固相萃取-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定水中6种雌激素

建立了固相萃取-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱(SPE-UPLC-MS-MS)同时检测水样中6种雌激素(壬基酚、双酚A、雌酮、17α-雌二醇、17α-乙炔雌二醇、雌三醇)的方法.样品采用SPE小柱富集后,用90％乙腈-0.1％氨水混合溶液洗脱浓缩定容.在梯度洗脱条件下,6种雌激素用三重四极杆串联质谱检测.该方法显示出良好的线性关系(r ＞0.999)和精密度(RSD＜ 10％),方法检出限为1.3 ～5.2 ng/L.该方法成功应用于地表水、地下水和废水样品中6种雌激素分析,样品加标回收率为76.8％～117％.该方法准确、灵敏、无需衍生,可用于同时测定水样中的6种雌激素.     

液相色谱-串联质谱法检测贝类产品中麻痹性贝类毒素

建立了贝类组织中11种麻痹性贝类毒素的高效液相色谱-串联质谱分析方法,包括STX、dcSTX、NEO、dcNEO、GTX1-4、dcGTX2,3和GTX5(B1)。贝类样品经含0.1%甲酸的80%(体积分数)乙腈水溶液超声提取后,经过冷冻分层,下层固体融化后通过HLB固相萃取小柱富集净化和10 000MWCO(Molecular Weight Cutoff)超滤管超滤截留,超滤液用于仪器分析。采用Zwitterionic亲水性相互作用色谱柱(250 mm×4.6 mm,5 μm,德国)分离,在多反应监测模式下进行定性和定量分析。各组分在一定的范围内具有良好的线性关系,平均回收率大于60%,相对标准偏差小于20%(n=7)。用该方法分析染毒的栉孔扇贝样品,证实了对PSP毒素具有良好的分析测定效果。     

乙腈盐析萃取HPLC-PDA同时测定水中11种苯胺类化合物

通过对色谱分析和样品萃取条件的选择和优化,建立了同时分析水中11种苯胺类化合物的HPLC方法。样品经乙腈盐析萃取后直接进样分析,采用 ODS色谱柱,以乙腈-水为流动相进行梯度洗脱,用PDA检测。结果表明,11种苯胺类化合物在0.20~100mg/L范围内其浓度和检测信号呈良好的线性关系,方法检出限为0.002~0.007mg/L,地表水和废水样品加标回收率为81.6%~97.4%,相对标准偏差为1.5%~5.5%。     

离子液体[BMIm][PF6]增强抗性质粒RP4介导的接合转移基因mRNA的表达水平

环境中广泛存在的抗生素和抗生素抗性基因会导致很严重的人类健康风险。在我们前期研究中发现,离子液体1-丁基-3-甲基咪唑六氟磷酸盐([BMIm][PF6])作为环境选择性压力可以促进抗生素抗性基因的水平转移。本研究以E.coli DH5α(RP4)和同属的E.coli HB101,以及E.coli DH5α(RP4)和跨属的Salmonella enterica之间的纯菌接合转移体系为考察对象,从mRNA基因表达调控水平角度阐明离子液体[BMIm][PF6](0.001~2.5 g·L-1)影响质粒RP4接合转移的机理。结果表明,离子液体[BMIm][PF6]通过抑制基因kor A,kor B和trb A的mRNA表达水平来提高接合和跨膜转运基因trb Bp和trf Ap的表达;增强水平转移基因tra F的mRNA表达水平,并通过增强负调控基因kil A和kil B的mRNA表达水平抑制质粒的垂直传递过程;通过抑制基因trb K的mRNA表达水平降低接合转移体系的排斥效果,从而促进质粒RP4的接合转移。该结果有助于为抗生素抗性基因在环境中水平转移扩散的机理研究提供理论依据。     

不同酸对造纸黑液酸析效果的研究

采用酸析法从造纸黑液中分离木质素,同时去除部分COD和色度,从而完成对黑液的初步处理。实验研究了酸析的最佳pH值,并将硫酸、硝酸、盐酸、磷酸、甲酸和草酸作为酸析剂,分析其分别对黑液色度、COD的去除效果及对木质素提取的影响。介绍了通过快速消解分光光度法来测定COD值,和用分光光度法测定色度值,分别建立COD值和色度对吸光度的工作曲线,使测量更加方便高效快捷,其精确度和准确度都能符合分析方法要求。实验结果表明,酸析效果较好的pH取值范围为2～4,考虑用酸的经济性和处理效果,选择pH=3作为最佳酸析条件;经过对酸析过程规律和原因的分析可得,硫酸、硝酸和磷酸对黑液处理效果较为理想,其中硫酸因其经济性被选为最佳,其色度、COD去除率分别为97.9%和66.1%,木质素的析出量为8.65 g/L。     

Volatile organic compounds at swine facilities: A critical review

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are regulated aerial pollutants that have environmental and health concerns. Swine operations produce and emit a complex mixture of VOCs with a wide range of molecular weights and a variety of physicochemical properties. Significant progress has been made in this area since the first experiment on VOCs at a swine facility in the early 1960s. A total of 47 research institutions in 15 North American, European, and Asian countries contributed to an increasing number of scientific publications. Nearly half of the research papers were published by U.S. institutions.Investigated major VOC sources included air inside swine barns, in headspaces of manure storages and composts, in open atmosphere above swine wastewater, and surrounding swine farms. They also included liquid swine manure and wastewater, and dusts inside and outside swine barns. Most of the sample analyses have been focusing on identification of VOC compounds and their relationship with odors. More than 500 VOCs have been identified. About 60% and 10% of the studies contributed to the quantification of VOC concentrations and emissions, respectively. The largest numbers of VOC compounds with reported concentrations in a single experimental study were 82 in air, 36 in manure, and 34 in dust samples.The relatively abundant VOC compounds that were quantified in at least two independent studies included acetic acid, butanoic acid (butyric acid), dimethyl disulfide, dimethyl sulfide, iso-valeric, p-cresol, propionic acid, skatole, trimethyl amine, and valeric acid in air. They included acetic acid, p-cresol, iso-butyric acid, butyric acid, indole, phenol, propionic acid, iso-valeric acid, and skatole in manure. In dust samples, they were acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, valeric acid, p-cresol, hexanal, and decanal. Swine facility VOCs were preferentially bound to smaller-size dusts.Identification and quantification of VOCs were restricted by using instruments based on gas Chromatography (GC) and liquid chromatography (LC) with different detectors most of which require time-consuming procedures to obtain results. Various methodologies and technologies in sampling, sample preparation, and sample analysis have been used. Only four publications reported using GC based analyzers and PTR-MS (proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry) that allowed continuous VOC measurement. Because of this, the majority of experimental studies were only performed on limited numbers of air, manure, or dust samples. Many aerial VOCs had concentrations that were too low to be identified by the GC peaks.Although VOCs emitted from swine facilities have environmental concerns, only a few studies investigated VOC emission rates, which ranged from 3.0 to 176.5 mg d⁻¹ kg⁻¹ pig at swine finishing barns and from 2.3 to 45.2 g d⁻¹ m⁻² at manure storages. Similar to the other pollutants, spatial and temporal variations of aerial VOC concentrations and emissions existed and were significantly affected by manure management systems, barn structural designs, and ventilation rates.Scientific research in this area has been mainly driven by odor nuisance, instead of environment or health concerns. Compared with other aerial pollutants in animal agriculture, the current scientific knowledge about VOCs at swine facilities is still very limited and far from sufficient to develop reliable emission factors.