2种统计方法在一次实验室间比对中的应用比较

比较了稳健统计法和误差系数法在水中苯系物实验室间比对结果中的应用,分别采用两种方法对比对结果进行了分析,探讨了两种统计方法的差异和适用范围。结果显示,两种方法对此次比对结果的分析结论基本一致,在实际应用中应跟据实验室间比对的目的和样品特点选择合适的统计方法。     

The case for regulating intragenic GMOs

This paper discusses the ethical and regulatory issues raised by “intragenics” – organisms that have been genetically modified using gene technologies, but that do not contain DNA from another species. Considering the rapid development of knowledge about gene regulation and genomics, we anticipate rapid advances in intragenic methods. Of regulatory systems developed to govern genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, the Australian system stands out in explicitly excluding intragenics from regulation. European systems are also under pressure to exclude intragenics from regulation. We evaluate recent arguments that intragenics are safer and more morally acceptable than transgenic organisms, and more acceptable to the public, which might be thought to justify a lower standard of regulation. We argue that the exemption of intragenics from regulation is not justified, and that there may be significant environmental risks associated with them. We conclude that intragenics should be subject to the same standard of regulation as other GMOs.     

The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of emotional connection to nature?

Mayer and Frantz (2004) proposed that their connectedness to nature scale (CNS) provides a measure of people's emotional connection to nature. After reanalyzing data from their article, collecting and analyzing our own data, and conducting a content analysis of CNS scale items, we conclude that the CNS does not measure an emotional connection to nature. Although results from our Study 1 and Study 2 support Mayer and Frantz's conclusion that the CNS measures one predominant factor, we suggest that factor measures cognitive beliefs and not emotional connections. Results from our Studies 3 and 4 suggest that the self-referential, less negatively toned wording of CNS items may account for differences in correlations, between the CNS and environmentalism (a measure of environmental identity) and between the New Ecological Paradigm Scale (a measure of environmental beliefs) and environmentalism, reported by Mayer and Frantz. In Study 5, we suggest that correlation differences reported by Mayer and Frantz may also be attributable to method variance, as opposed to content differences between the CNS and the New Ecological Paradigm scale. We provide recommendations for revising the CNS to focus on beliefs about their connection to nature.     

畜禽废水处理技术及其应用进展

针对我国养殖业废水污染日益严重的现状,介绍了畜禽废水还田利用、自然处理以及工业化处理的优缺点、国内外应用现状以及研究的重点,并结合我国的实际情况,提出现阶段我国养殖业废水应重点发展还田利用技术与自然处理技术,并及时建立畜禽废水处理设计数据库以及编写设计规范。     

我国建筑安全生产管理责任制度的政策评估与完善

综合评价了我国现行建筑安全生产管理责任制度实施的效果及其影响,指出造成当前政策争议的根源在于对事故致因的规律理解不够、对建设单位和监理单位的经济及社会属性认识不清,以及对威慑性(而不是服务性)安全管理手段的偏好。建筑安全生产责任的分配应充分考虑事故致因规律及各方控制能力,制度设计应纳入建设单位作为生产者的属性特征,政府管理应注重激励和引导的监管手段。     

广州市污染季节空气质量预报效果评估及误差分析

基于广州市2016年第四季度空气质量实测及预报数据,对广州市污染季节空气质量预报效果进行了评估,结果表明,2016年第四季度广州市空气质量级别预报准确率83.7%、AQI范围预报准确率67.4%、首要污染物预报准确率67.2%、综合考核评分87.4分、相关系数0.78,预报效果总体良好,预报准确率在优良级别时相对较高,而在轻度污染以上级别时相对较低。预报误差分析表明,气象预报精细化程度不足、模式预报不确定性等客观因素,预报员缺乏对污染过程物理化学机制的深入理解等主观因素共同导致了预报的误差。     

新时代美丽中国的建设思路与战略任务研究

党的二十大提出要建设人与自然和谐共生的现代化,美丽中国建设是社会主义现代化强国的重要目标之一,是中国式现代化的基本内涵和重要表征。面对新时代美丽中国建设整体部署还需进一步明确的现实需求,本文在总结美丽中国建设进展成效的基础上,分析识别推进美丽中国建设面临的主要问题与挑战,提出推进美丽中国建设的总体思路和目标路径,围绕绿色低碳发展、环境治理、生态保护、应对气候变化、生态环境治理体系和治理能力现代化等美丽中国建设重点领域,提出推进加快发展方式绿色转型、推进国家重大战略绿色发展、推动环境污染防治、打造美丽宜居城乡、提升生态系统多样性、稳定性和持续性、推进碳达峰碳中和、构建生态环境风险防控体系、共建清洁美丽世界等8个方面美丽中国建设重点任务。     

“精密度偏性分析”是环境监测质量保证的重要手段

“精密度偏性分析”是环境监测质量保证的重要手段。通过它可以了解其方法的误差和检出限是否达到要求,同时也了解实验室和操作人员对该方法的适应性。     

典型药物污染物的SPE-UPLC-MS-MS检测方法

采用固相萃取-高效液相色谱-串联质谱法(SPE-UPLC-MS-MS)测定自然水体中的10种典型药物污染。比较了2种萃取柱HLB和C18的富集效果,并对水样pH、萃取柱的淋洗溶剂及水样体积进行了优化。结果表明,采用HLB小柱进行富集净化,水样体积为500 mL,调节pH=3.0,95%甲醇洗脱,在0~200μg/L范围内10种药物的标准曲线线性关系良好(r≥0.999),方法检出限0.5~2.0 ng/L,精密度高(RSD10%),加标回收率为64.3%~100.7%。经过对太湖和某污水厂排水口水样的测试,表明该方法适用于自然水体药物的快速检测,同时大部分药物被检出,说明选择的10种目标药物及建立的检测方法对研究中国水体药物污染具有一定的参考价值。     

The idea(s) of ‘valuing nature’: insights from the UK’s ecosystem services framework

The variety of ideas about ways nature is ‘valued’ in public policymaking are investigated. A theoretical ideational approach is combined with empirical analysis of the UK’s ecosystem services framework. Several types of ideas are identified, and how they interact is examined: ideas about nature itself; about the role that different research on the value of nature can or should play in decision-making; and about how policy decisions are made. In particular, the ways these ideas appear in academic debates, especially in ecological economics and philosophy, are confronted with how ideas appear in the policy practice of employing a ‘valuing nature’ concept. This reveals political dynamics sometimes missed by both advocates and critics of the concept of ecosystem services, such as the importance of promoting organisations and their agendas and activities, persuading different actors to change positions, and institutional commitments and sunk costs.