填埋场渗滤液控制系统的作用与组成

针对填埋场的功能与作用,比较了美国和日本2种不同的渗滤液集排水系统设计观点,并在全面分析填埋场系统各部分功能的基础上,提出了渗滤液控制系统及其水量控制、水质控制和排气3个功能的概念,以及功能交叉和系统间配合的设计思想。      

Adsorbable organic halides (AOX), AOX formation potential, and PCDDs/DFs in landfill leachate and their removal in water treatment processes

Adsorbable organic halides (AOX) and AOX formation potential (AOXFP) were investigated in 46 landfill lea-chates as potentially toxic parameters. AOX in landfill leachate was within the range <10–2200 μg Cl/l, and AOXFP was within 51–15 000 μg Cl/l. AOX and AOXFP correlated with chemical oxygen demand (COD). AOX discharge from closed landfills was generally lower than that from operating landfills. The molar ratio of AOXFP/total organic carbon (TOC) suggested that organic compounds in a leachate have a double bond every 15–190 carbons under the supposition that one chlorine would add to one double bond. The five landfills discharging high-level AOXFP (>4000 μg Cl/l) were all landfills where sludge had been dumped. The removal efficiencies of three parameters through leachate treatment processes were as follows: polychlorinated dibenzo-dioxins/dibenzo-furans (PCDDs/DFs) > TOC > AOX. PCDDs/DFs were substantially removed at p.p.t. levels, while AOX was hardly removed at relatively low levels. Received: February 14, 2000 / Accepted: January 9, 2001     

垃圾填埋场渗滤液的产生，控制处理

垃圾填埋场作为固体废弃物的一种最终处置方法在三废治理中起着重要的作用。但是垃圾填埋场产生的渗滤液会成为二次污染，本文就渗滤液的产生，控制以及处理进行了探讨。     

垃圾堆酵对焚烧厂垃圾热值的影响

分析了垃圾焚烧厂的渗滤液；基于渗滤液的体积和ＣＯＤｃｒ值，估算焚烧厂垃圾堆酵对垃圾热影响以及焚烧厂垃圾的适宜堆酵时间，实验结果表明，上海生活垃圾渗滤液是生化性好的高浓度有机废液，堆酵５ｄ，其低位热值〉４６００ＫＪ／ｋｇ，可直接焚烧。     

城市生活垃圾填埋场渗沥液处理的工艺技术

简单介绍了城市生活垃圾填埋汤渗沥液的水质现状和变化趋势，以及渗沥液处理工艺。讨论了硝化，反硝化等工艺在实际工作中的运用情况。     

垃圾填埋渗滤液的处理方法与实验研究

介绍了城市垃圾填埋场渗滤液的特点及处理技术 ,并结合沈阳市实际进行实验研究     

Influence of aeration modes on leachate characteristic of landfills that adopt the aerobic–anaerobic landfill method

As far as the optimal design, operation, and field application of the Aerobic–Anaerobic Landfill Method (AALM) are concerned, it is very important to understand how aeration modes (different combinations of aeration depth and air injection rate) affect the biodegradation of organic carbon and the transformation of nitrogen in landfill solid waste. Pilot-scale lysimeter experiments were carried out under different aeration modes to obtain detailed information regarding the influence of aeration modes on leachate characteristics. Results from these lysimeter experiments revealed that aeration at the bottom layer was the most effective for decomposition of organic carbon when compared with aeration at the surface or middle layers. Moreover, the air injection rate led to different nitrogen transformation patterns, unlike the lesser influence it has on organic carbon decomposition. Effective simultaneous nitrification and denitrification were observed for the aeration mode with a higher air injection rate (=1.0 L/min). On the other hand, the phenomenon of sequenced nitrification and denitrification could be observed when a low air injection rate (=0.5 L/min.) was employed. Finally, it is concluded that, for AALM, air injection with a higher air injection rate at the deepest layer near the leachate collection pipe tends to accelerate the stabilization of landfill waste as defined in terms of the enhancement of denitrification as well as organic carbon decomposition.     

Biodegradation and flushing of MBT wastes

Mechanical–biological treatment (MBT) processes are increasingly being adopted as a means of diverting biodegradable municipal waste (BMW) from landfill, for example to comply with the EU Landfill Directive. However, there is considerable uncertainty concerning the residual pollution potential of such wastes. This paper presents the results of laboratory experiments on two different MBT waste residues, carried out to investigate the remaining potential for the generation of greenhouse gases and the flushing of contaminants from these materials when landfilled. The potential for gas generation was found to be between 8% and 20% of that for raw MSW. Pretreatment of the waste reduced the potential for the release of organic carbon, ammoniacal nitrogen, and heavy metal contents into the leachate; and reduced the residual carbon remaining in the waste after final degradation from ～320 g/kg dry matter for raw MSW to between 183 and 195 g/kg dry matter for the MBT wastes.     

渗滤液回灌在实际应用中应注意的问题

本文介绍了垃圾填埋场渗滤液回灌的机理、优缺点,“干填埋”与“湿填埋”之间的区别。渗滤液回灌可增加填埋废物的含水率,加快垃圾的降解速率,减少渗滤液的处理时间,提高填埋气中甲烷的含量,加速填埋场稳定化进程。鉴于以上这些优点,渗滤液回灌作为一种渗滤液处理方式将会有极大的应用前景。但在实际应用中回灌的渗滤液容易泄漏而导致地下水污染,这是影响渗滤液回灌广泛应用的主要原因。为了避免使地下水受污染,本文总结和分析了渗滤液回灌在实际应用中应注意的问题。     

磷酸氨镁法处理晚期垃圾渗滤液氨氮最佳工艺条件

高浓度氨氮（NH^＋4-N）是造成晚期垃圾渗滤液难以生物处理的重要原因之一,当前物化法处理垃圾渗滤液中氨氮存在不足。磷酸氨镁（MAP）沉淀法可以彻底地去除晚期垃圾渗滤液中NH^＋4-N,而且生成的沉淀物是非常好的缓释肥料,具有较高的经济价值及应用前景。研究结果表明,最佳的工艺条件为：pH=8.5-9.5,n（N）：n（Mg）：n（P）=1：1：1时,处理效果较好,NH^＋4-N去除率大于96％,且残余总磷（TP）浓度小于原水值。