务德镇生态建设规划促进经济与环境协调发展实证分析

论述了生态建设规划的核心内容，要建设领域和重点任务规划几个层面规划内容，调发展。生态功能区区划和重点保护区域、生态分区建设规划、主实证分析证明，生态建设规划促进了务德镇经济与环境协     

地震应急避难场所的规划建设与城市防灾

地震应急避难场所是城市防灾减灾应付突发事件的重要措施之一。本文在介绍了国内外应急避难场所的建设现状之后,结合北京市应急避难工作的探索与实践提出了城市应急避难场所的规划原则和技术要求、设计要求、启用与管理等几个方面的问题。     

异龙湖退田还湖生态建设规划方案研究

异龙湖是云南省九大高原湖泊中人为破坏最严重的湖泊之一，目前湖水水质已超地面水环境质量v类标准，呈现严重的富营养化状态；湖泊沼泽化程度加剧，水供需矛盾突出。论述了异龙湖退田还湖的必要性、退田还湖对水环境的影响以及如何制订切实可行生态建设规划方案。同时对退田还湖移民安置政策进行探讨。     

土地利用系统规划和设计方法探讨

应用系统思想和生态学原理，提出了以土地─食物─人这一耦合运行发展过程研究为中心、以建立合理的土地利用系统为目标的农区土地利用规划和设计方法模型框架，其中包括：目标设计；土地评价；农业生态系统分析；土地利用系统定量化研究模拟模型；土地利用系统结构优化；土地利用系统生态设计；多层次人工控制系统设计。     

建立上海可持续发展指标体系的研究

在可持续发展理论研究中，提出建立多目标的指标体系是实施可持续发展战略的重要环节，阐述了建立上海可持续发展指标体系的５项基本原则是系统性、层次性、主要性、可比性、操作性。据此设计了包括４个领域６０个指标组成的指标体系框架。阐明了从原计划指标体系滚动式过渡到可持续发展指标体系；从第１０个五年计划开始，３个五年计划分３步建立并完善指标体系与国际接轨和建立综合评价指数来表征可持续发展状况等实施可持续发展指     

改善环境规划管理 促进沈阳的可持续发展

结合正在实施之中的“沈阳可持续发展项目”,论述了通过消除沈阳环境规划管理方面的制约因素 ,加强发展过程中的跨部门协调合作、民主决策和公众广泛参与的机制 ,促进沈阳市社会、经济和环境全面的持续发展     

The consequences of avoiding conflict: lessons from conservation planning for Europe's last wild reindeer

This paper seeks to contribute to debates on the potential for conservation planning to engage actively with conflict. Current research in conservation planning generally approaches conflict by concentrating on the challenges of securing agreement and consensus. Recent planning literature advocates approaches that are more open to conflict. In the analysis of a Norwegian regional planning process for wild reindeer conservation, we examine how planning authorities handled conflict, and in particular how planning documents portrayed conflicts expressed during the planning process. Findings show that the aim of reaching regional consensus limited the scope of planning, and led to the exclusion of difficult issues and opposing views. Instead of engaging actively with conflict, the planning authority framed opposing positions as unplannable, and failed to recognise them as legitimate. This contributed to weakening of the legitimacy of the regional plan when put to the test.     

Positive perceptions of green and open space as predictors of neighbourhood quality of life: implications for urban planning across the city region

The provision of green and open space in the face of wider development pressure is a key urban challenge. Despite this, few studies have critically investigated the quality of life implications of such provision. This paper focuses on perceptions of built environment factors and their influence on neighbourhood quality of life. Data are drawn from a household survey questionnaire completed by 483 residents living in three neighbourhoods in Dublin, Ireland – an inner city neighbourhood, a suburb and a peri-urban settlement. Positive perceptions of green and open space were identified as important predictors of high levels of neighbourhood satisfaction, surpassed only by dwelling characteristics. This suggests that development strategies which fail to provide for properly planned green and open spaces may be detrimental to neighbourhood quality of life. Furthermore, the results suggest a need for design solutions which consider neighbourhood typology in achieving improved neighbourhood quality of life.     

Federal Decentralization and Adaptive Management of Water Resources: Reservoir Reallocation by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Reservoir operations must respond to changing conditions, such as climate, water demand, regulations, and sedimentation. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) can reallocate reservoir storage to respond to such changes. We assembled and analyzed a database of reservoir reallocations implemented and proposed by the Corps. While only a small portion of total reservoir storage nationwide has been reallocated, there are substantial differences in reallocation frequency and magnitude across the nation: some Corps Districts and Divisions use reallocation while others do not, relying more on discretion and small‐scale adaptation of operations. This difference illustrates how water resource agencies like the Corps decentralize management decisions to allow responding to disparate conditions. Decentralized decision‐making provides a responsive approach to water management, while centralized and hierarchical decision‐making is a slower, more deliberative approach. Decentralized decision‐making may lead to the accumulation of short‐term, local decisions over time to the point that the system is managed differently than anticipated. Reallocation, which is a form of planned adaptive management, can be accommodating of multiple competing demands and different stakeholders, yet expensive and less temporally responsive. The challenge for any large water resource management agency is to balance between local‐level, responsive discretion vs. centralized, planned decision‐making.