长江流域资源环境与区域发展研究的回顾及展望

资源与环境问题是影响和制约可持续发展的核心问题。对《长江流域资源与环境》1995年至2004年10年间发表的学术论文进行了统计分析，就论文所涉及的研究领域、论文所运用的研究方法、研究机构的类型与地域分布等特征进行了全面的归类分析和总结研究。认为资源环境科学与区域可持续发展在未来的研究过程中必须实现促进学科的交叉与渗透，实现学科的系统集成与整合发展；寻找科学研究中的薄弱环节和新的生长点，积极开辟新的研究领域； 强化各项新技术、新手段的应用，提高科学研究的技术水平；深化区域研究，提高区域研究的综合性水平四大突破，才能适应和满足学科发展及社会发展的需要。     

依靠科技进步发展生态农业

本文通过对山东省农业现状的分析,从理论与实践的结合上阐述了发展生态农业是促进农业稳步健康发展的必然抉择,是实现高产优质高效的途径。对如何依靠科技进步促进生态农业发展的做法和经验进行了系统的总结,供有关部门借鉴和参考。     

基于DIAHP的旅游环境容量分析及相关对策研究

基于普通层次分析法的基本原理,融入"权变"思想,针对旅游环境容量的动态性,提出了1种动态改进层次分析法(DIAHP),分析旅游环境容量随时间变化的动态波动特征.最后,通过对南戴河国际娱乐中心的实证研究,验证了其可行性和有效性.     

Adapting the bioblitz to meet conservation needs

When conservation strategies require new, field‐based information, practitioners must find the best ways to rapidly deliver high‐quality survey data. To address this challenge, several rapid‐assessment approaches have been developed since the early 1990s. These typically involve large areas, take many months to complete, and are not appropriate when conservation‐relevant survey data are urgently needed for a specific locale. In contrast, bioblitzes are designed for quick collection of site‐specific survey data. Although bioblitzes are commonly used to achieve educational or public‐engagement goals, conservation practitioners are increasingly using a modified bioblitz approach to generate conservation‐relevant data while simultaneously enhancing research capacity and building working partnerships focused on conservation concerns. We term these modified events expert bioblitzes. Several expert bioblitzes have taken place on lands of conservation concern in Southern California and have involved collaborative efforts of government agencies, nonprofit organizations, botanic gardens, museums, and universities. The results of expert bioblitzes directly informed on‐the‐ground conservation and decision‐making; increased capacity for rapid deployment of expert bioblitzes in the future; and fostered collaboration and communication among taxonomically and institutionally diverse experts. As research and conservation funding becomes increasingly scarce, expert bioblitzes can play an increasingly important role in biodiversity conservation.     

广州市居民省外游出游行为研究

根据2001年10月到2002年1月对广州702名市民进行的抽样调查资料，作者对广州市居民到省外旅游的行为进行了分析，得出了该地区居民的省外游行为规律。     

环境影响评价中的公众参与

论述了公众参与在环境影响评价中的重要性，在实施公众参与环境影响评价的实践中，创造了多种切实有效的方法，给受影响的公众充分发表意见的机会，通过公众参与，提高环境决策的质量。     

传统文化与现代旅游景观的契合 ——重庆龙水湖规划与设计

文章通过对重庆龙水湖景区规划设计构思的分析，阐述了传统文化与现代旅游景观融合的规划设计手法。     

安全科学的研究对象与知识体系

在研讨安全科学和学科内涵若干论述的基础上,以科学、交叉科学、辩证唯物主义为指导,对安全科学的研究对象、安全科学的知识体系、安全科学综合理论体系的构成进行了表述。以大安全观为主线,给出了安全科学是以人们在生活、生产、生存领域的安全问题为研究对象;研究具有复杂的、巨系统特点的安全系统的结构,研究其由安全态如何突变、势垒跃迁转化为另一个安全态;研究消除或控制危害因素的理论和技术;研究如何控制和回避风险;研究安全观念和思维知识体系的一门交叉学科。特别阐明了安全科学研究对象的特殊性及其要揭示的特殊规律。试图确立安全科学的科学地位。     

民族村寨旅游景观系统构建的初步研究

我国民族村寨旅游景观系统的构建缺乏理论研究,结合景观生态学相关理论对民族村寨旅游景观系统的构建提出初步构想,并对该系统的结构、特性等进行了分析。     

The Role of Science in Public Policy: Higher Reason,or Reason for Hire?

The traditional vision of the role science should play in policy making is of a two stage process of scientists first finding out the facts, and then policy makers making a decision about what to do about them. We argue that this two stage process is a fiction and that a distinction must be drawn between pure science and science in the service of public policy. When science is transferred into the policy realm, its claims to truth get undermined because we must abandon the open-ended nature of scientific inquiry. When we move from the sphere of science to the sphere of policy, we pick an arbitrary point in the open-ended scientific process, and ask our experts to give us the answer. The choice of the endpoint, however, must always be arbitrary and determined by non-scientific factors. Thus, the two stages in the model of first finding the facts, and then making a decision about what to do, cannot be clearly separated. The second stage clearly affects the first. This conclusion will have implications about existing scientific policy institutions. For example, we advocate that the environmental assessment process be radically overhauled, or perhaps even let go. It will be our position that ultimately a better model for the involvement of scientists in public policy debates is that of being participants in particular interest groups (“hired guns”), rather than as supposedly unbiased consultants to decision-makers.