红壤丘陵区冬闲稻田CH4和N2O排放通量的研究

CH4和N2O是与全球气候变化密切相关的2种主要温室气体,其排放规律以及减排措施已成为当前研究的热点。休闲期抛荒稻田普遍存在于我国西南和南方地区,而对于其CH4和N2O排放规律的研究还比较少。本实验选取江西红壤丘陵区进行观测,于稻田休闲期采用静态箱-气相色谱法进行原位观测,旨在探讨休闲期CH4和N2O的排放规律,可为制定减排措施提供一定的依据。研究结果表明：红壤丘陵区冬闲稻田CH4和N2O平均排放通量（以CH4和N2O-N计）分别为0.03mg.m-2.h-1和3.27μg.m-2.h-1。冬闲期CH4和N2O平均排放通量与土温、降雨量无明显线性关系（P〉0.05）。冬闲稻田排放CH4和N2O的综合温室效应（以CO2-eq计）为7.58 g.m-2,其中,CH4和N2O产生的温室效应（以CO2-eq计）分别为2.33和5.25 g.m-2。N2O排放量是冬闲稻田温室气体观测中不可忽视的部分。     

中国ODS的排放及其对温室效应的贡献

分析了消耗臭氧层物质(ODS)在中国的消费状况和逐步淘汰的进程.选择1999年为基准年,列出了中国ODS的排放清单,根据各物质作不同用途的排放特点,计算了这些物质的实际排放量的臭氧消耗潜势(ODP)值和全球变暖潜势(GWP)值.结果表明,1999年中国排放的ODS的ODP值约43496t,按照GWP值折算,相当于约60.4106t当量碳.削减和淘汰ODS,不仅能够保护臭氧层,对控制全球变暖也有很大贡献.     

秸秆还田对冬小麦-夏玉米农田土壤固碳、氧化亚氮排放和全球增温潜势的影响

旱地农田温室气体净排放(以全球增温潜势表示)主要取决于土壤固碳速率和氧化亚氮(N2O)排放量.基于长期定位施肥试验,综合分析2010～2017年表层(0～20 cm)土壤有机碳含量和2014～2017年N2O排放通量的观测结果,定量评价秸秆还田对关中平原冬小麦-夏玉米农田土壤固碳速率、N2O年排放量和全球增温潜势的影响...     

吉林西部盐碱水田区全球变暖潜势研究

为了探讨吉林西部土地整理工程对区域全暖所做贡献,基于实测的水田土壤温室气体数据,进行区域温室气体排放分析,为进一步评估水田开发对全球变暖的影响提供科学依据。以吉林省西部盐碱水田区为研究对象,将野外调查采样和小区试验相结合,采集了水田的0-30 cm表层土壤样品带回进行小区实验。在小区内挖取100 cm×100 cm×50 cm的坑,在土坑底部铺设塑料布后,将从采样点带回的土壤填进坑内灌水,种植水稻,6块样地分别为不同开发年限,其处置模式与前郭当地的水肥管理相同,样地周围挖掘了排水渠。通过静态箱-气相色谱法监测水稻生长期土壤所释放的温室气体 CH4,N2O 和CO2,计算水稻不同生长时期温室气体排放量及贡献率,估算研究区的区域变暖潜势（GWP）,结合30年水田面积变化加权法分析温室气体GWP贡献率。结果表明：水田生长期温室气体排放总量（以CO2气体计）随着开发年限的增加呈递增趋势,水田开发过程中CO2、CH4和N2O各时期温室气体排放的贡献率都有一定变化,CO2气体排放贡献率占主导地位在80%左右,CH4的贡献率16.69%-20.39%,是N2O的14-22倍,水田CH4气体的排放对研究区综合温室效应有较大贡献,水田开发初期N2O气体贡献率较成熟水田相比较高。在水稻生长旺盛期CO2气体贡献率下降明显,CH4气体贡献率显著升高,N2O气体贡献率变化不大,在返青期和成熟期CH4和N2O 2种气体贡献率均较小,其中,除成熟期外新开发水田的CH4气体贡献率均高于成熟水田,在水稻生长发育较快速的分蘖期、拔节孕穗期和抽穗开花期,CO2气体贡献率下降且降幅明显,该阶段CH4气体对温室效应的贡献比重加大,远高于N2O气体。在水稻成熟期,3种温室气体的贡献率与其他时期相比发生较大变化,CH4比 N2O 略有优势,CO2所占比例恢复至95%。?     

Environmental and economic impact assessment of construction and demolition waste disposal using system dynamics

Construction and demolition wastes (CDW) have increasingly serious problems in environmental, social, and economic realms. There is no coherent framework for utilization of these wastes which are disposed both legally and illegally. This harms the environment, contributes to the increase of energy consumption, and depletes finite landfills resources. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the impacts of two alternatives for the management of CDW, recycling and disposing. The evaluation is carried out through developing a dynamic model with aid STELLA software by conducting the following steps: (1) quantifying the total cost incurred to mitigate the impacts of CDW landfills and uncollected waste on the environment and human health; (2) quantifying the total avoided emissions and saved energy by recycling waste; (3) estimating total external cost saved by recycling waste and; (4) providing a decision support tool that helps in re-thinking about waste disposal. The proposed evaluation methodology allows activating the stringent regulations that restrict waste disposal and developing incentives to encourage constructors to recycle their wastes. The research findings show that recycling CDW leads to significant reductions in emissions, energy use, global warming potential (GWP), and conserves landfills space when compared to disposal of wastes in landfills. Furthermore, the cost of mitigating the impact of disposal is extremely high. Therefore, it is necessary to recycle construction and demolition wastes.     

生物黑炭还田对晚稻CH4和N2O综合减排影响研究

利用静态箱法测定了稻草直接还田和生物黑炭还田对湖南晚稻CH4和N2O排放的影响。结果表明,与单施化肥处理相比,添加稻草和生物黑炭处理的CH4排放量分别增加了24.70%（P〈0.05）和6.32%,而N2O的排放量分别降低了37.08%（P〈0.05）和37.61%（P〈0.05）;生物黑炭CH4排放量较稻草还田减少了14.74%（P〈0.05）。按100年统计稻田CH4和N2O的综合增温潜势（GWP）表明,单位产量的GWP由大到小顺序为稻草（RS）,不施肥（CK）,黑炭（BC）,化肥（CF）。综上说明,生物黑炭还田能保持晚稻产量稳定,减少了当季晚稻CH4和N2O的排放,具有一定的生态环境效益。     

Distributed generation by energy from waste technology: A life cycle perspective

Municipal Solid Waste in general and its organic fraction in particular is a potential renewable and non-seasonal resource. In this work, a life cycle assessment has been performed to evaluate the environmental impacts of two future scenarios using biogas produced from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) to supply energy to a group of dwellings, respectively comprising distributed generation using solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) micro-CHP systems and condensing boilers. The London Borough of Greenwich is taken as the reference case study. The system is designed to assess how much energy demand can be met and what is the best way to use the digestible waste for distributed energy purposes.The system is compared with two alternative scenarios fuelled by natural gas: a reference scenario, where the electricity is supplied by the grid and the heat is supplied from condensing boilers, and a fuel cell micro-CHP system. The results show that, although OFMSW alone can only supply between 1% and 4% of the total energy demand of the Borough, a saving of ∼130 tonnes of CO₂ eq per year per dwelling equipped with micro-CHP is still achievable compared with the reference scenario. This is primarily due to the surplus electricity produced by the fuel cell when the micro-CHP unit is operated to meet the heat demand. Use of biogas to produce heat only is therefore a less desirable option compared with combined heat and power production. Further investigation is required to identify locally available feedstock other than OFMSW in order to increase the proportion of energy demand that can be met in this way.     

Life cycle assessment as a decision support tool for landfill gas-to energy projects

The greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from MSW landfill, and control methods to eliminate or minimize these impacts including energy recovery from landfill gas (LFG) of MSW landfill in Thailand have been evaluated. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is used as the analytical tool to evaluate the environmental consequences of landfilling holistically. The economic implications of the control methods are also briefly assessed. The results show that in terms of GHG emissions as well as in terms of economics, it is more advantageous to have a large centralized landfill and produce electricity from the LFG rather than having several small, localized landfills despite significantly lower transportation requirement for the latter case. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the global warming potential was sensitive to gas collection efficiency as well as methane oxidation rate in the landfill. This study shows the utility of a life cycle approach for evaluating LFG-to-energy (LFGTE) projects.     

地膜覆盖对稻-油轮作农田CH4和N2O排放的影响

以位于西南大学农业部重庆紫色土生态环境重点野外科学观测试验站内的稻-油轮作农田为研究对象,采用静态暗箱/气相色谱法,对覆膜与常规(不覆膜)两种处理下稻-油轮作农田CH_4和N_2O的排放特征及影响因素进行了为期一年的原位观测.结果表明,两种处理下,CH_4和N_2O的排放均主要集中在各作物的生长前期,水稻季CH_4和油菜季N_2O的排放通量均具有较明显的季节变化;全年CH_4的排放通量介于-0.45~1.90 mg·(m~2·h)~(-1),N_2O的排放通量介于-46.1~2 040.7μg·(m~2·h)~(-1).地膜覆盖提高了CH_4和N_2O排放总量,其中覆膜处理全年CH_4排放总量为(27.22±4.48)kg·hm~(-2),相比常规处理(19.93±0.56)kg·hm~(-2)提高了26.22%;覆膜处理N_2O的年排放总量为(13.14±0.82)kg·hm~(-2),较常规处理下(11.27±2.77)kg·hm~(-2)增加了16.6%.覆膜显著提高了油菜季土壤含水率,而对全年各作物季土壤温度(地下5 cm温度和地表温度)没有明显的影响.覆膜处理下油菜季CH_4和N_2O的排放与土壤含水率呈负相关,幼苗期达显著负相关;两种处理下,各作物季CH_4和N_2O的排放与土壤温度的相关性均很小.研究表明,地膜覆盖影响作物各生育期内CH_4和N_2O的排放规律,改变了作物各生育期内2种气体排放占全季排放量的比例,促进了稻-油轮作农田CH_4和N_2O的排放.在100 a时间尺度上,覆膜处理下全年排放的CH_4和N_2O所引起的综合GWP(CO_2量)为4 213.00 kg·hm~(-2),较常规处理3 454.17 kg·hm~(-2)提高了22.0%,表明覆膜不是一种有效的碳减排措施.     

稻鸭复合系统的温室气体排放及其温室效应

利用密闭箱技术和碱液吸收法.通过田间试验研究了稻鸭复合系统土壤CH4、N2O和CO2的排放规律及其温室效应.结果表明:①在水稻生长期间,CH4分别在分蘖期和抽穗期出现2个排放高峰.平均排放通量养鸭处理为(7.68±0.74)mg·m-2·h-1.常规淹水稻田(对照)为(9.53±0.40)mg·m-2·h-1;N2O排放通量呈现出在稻田淹水期间保持较低值,在稻田落干后迅速升高的趋势,平均排放通量养鸭处理为(0.092±0.073)mg·m-2·h-1,对照为(0.082±0.074)mg·m-2·h-1;而CO2的排放则在分蘖期和成熟期田面水逐渐落干后呈现2个排放峰,养鸭处理和对照的平均排放通量分别为(121.20±4.21)mg·m-2·h-1和(107.53±3.92)mg·m-2·h-1.②稻田养鸭显著地降低了CH4的排放.水稻整个生育期间排放量为18.41 g.m-2,比对照减少19.3%;而显著地提高了N2O的排放,整个生育期间排放量为0.2 g·m-2,比对照增加了10%;养鸭稻田土壤CO2的总排放量为273.66 g·m-2,对照为245.73 g·m-2,两者之间没有显著性的差异.③CH4是引起稻田温室气体综合温室效应的主体,其贡献率在60%左右,相对于常规稻作,稻田养鸭能有效降低甲烷的温室效应,使其温室气体的综合温室效应显著降低.说明在中国南部稻鸭共作是一个减缓全球温室效应的可行措施.