直接进样-超高效液相色谱——三重四级杆串联质谱法测定地表水中丙烯酰胺

采用直接进样一超高效液相色谱-三重四级杆串联质谱法,建立了对地表水中丙烯酰胺的分析方法。该方法不需要衍生化等前处理步骤。结果表明,丙烯酰胺含量在0．100～10．0μg／L范围内具有很好的线性相关性,实际水样加标回收率为80．0％-105％。该方法的检出限和测定下限分别为0．025μg／L和0．100μg／L,能够满足地表水环境质量标准中关于饮用水中丙烯酰胺最高安全浓度指南的要求,提高了引用水源丙烯酰胺的检测要求。     

气相色谱/负离子化学电离质谱法测定地表水中硫丹及其代谢物

采用气相色谱/负离子化学电离质谱法测定地表水中的硫丹及其代谢物,用正己烷提取,外标法定量。α-硫丹、β-硫丹及硫丹硫酸酯在0.200μg/L～10.0μg/L范围内线性良好,方法检出限分别为0.010μg/L、0.008μg/L及0.010μg/L,空白加标平行测定的RSD为3.9%～4.8%,地表水样品加标回收率为85.5%～93.8%。     

花溪水库表层沉积物重金属污染及潜在生态风险评价

以现代工业化前正常颗粒沉积物中重金属含量的最高背景值为参比值,结合潜在生态风险指数法对花溪沉积物中重金属的生态危害进行了评价。结果表明,花溪水库沉积物中重金属的富集顺序为Cu>Zn>Pb>Cr>As>Cd>Hg,污染水平顺序为Hg>Cd>Cu>As>Pb>Cr>Zn;重金属的潜在生态风险系数(Eir)表明,除个别样点外,大多属于轻微生态危害范畴;多种重金属的生态系统的潜在生态风险指数(IR)表明,花溪水库沉积物重金属污染属于轻微生态危害。     

地表水中丁基黄原酸的保存条件研究

通过对不同基质地表水样中丁基黄原酸在p H值、温度、光照、保存时间等条件下进行保存研究,确定对其保存效果的影响为:保存时间保存温度样品中丁基黄原酸浓度光照强度p H值。建议地表水样品使用棕色玻璃瓶盛装,于4℃下避光保存原水。高浓度样品,保存时间不超过5 d;低浓度样品,保存时间不超过1 d,最好采样后立即分析。     

地表水环境质量标准有机物指标检测分析方法整合

分析地表水环境质量标准68项有机指标分析方法的不足,概述其分析方法整合优化的研究现状,并归纳总结目前地表水中68项有机指标的最新分析方法,结合经典分析方法,将68项有机指标的分析方法由40余种整合为20种。     

挥发酚和总氰化物在三种水质中测定方法的比对

本文采用连续流动注射法[1]和紫外分光光度法[2-3],分别对地表水、生活污水、工业废水三种水质中的挥发酚和总氰化物进行测定。实验结果表明:两种分析方法测定三种水质中的挥发酚和总氰化物结果基本一致,检出限、精密度、准确度、加标回收率均符合质量控制要求。连续流动注射法的自动化程度更高,操作更简便,可适用于多种水质挥发酚和总氰化物的分析。     

Ceramic water filter for point-of-use water treatment in developing countries: Principles,challenges and opportunities

• CWF is a sustainable POU water treatment method for developing areas. • CWF manufacturing process is critical for its filtration performance. • Simultaneous increase of flow rate and pathogen removal is a challenge. • Control of pore size distribution holds promises to improve CWF efficiency. • Novel coatings of CWFs are a promising method to improve contaminant removal. Drinking water source contamination poses a great threat to human health in developing countries. Point-of-use (POU) water treatment techniques, which improve drinking water quality at the household level, offer an affordable and convenient way to obtain safe drinking water and thus can reduce the outbreaks of waterborne diseases. Ceramic water filters (CWFs), fabricated from locally sourced materials and manufactured by local labor, are one of the most socially acceptable POU water treatment technologies because of their effectiveness, low-cost and ease of use. This review concisely summarizes the critical factors that influence the performance of CWFs, including (1) CWF manufacturing process (raw material selection, firing process, silver impregnation), and (2) source water quality. Then, an in-depth discussion is presented with emphasis on key research efforts to address two major challenges of conventional CWFs, including (1) simultaneous increase of filter flow rate and bacterial removal efficiency, and (2) removal of various concerning pollutants, such as viruses and metal(loid)s. To promote the application of CWFs, future research directions can focus on: (1) investigation of pore size distribution and pore structure to achieve higher flow rates and effective pathogen removal by elucidating pathogen transport in porous ceramic and adjusting manufacture parameters; and (2) exploration of new surface modification approaches with enhanced interaction between a variety of contaminants and ceramic surfaces.     

表面处理技术在给排水管道防腐中的应用现状探究

给排水管道是市政排水工程当中不可或缺的重要内容,其质量直接影响着我国当前广大群众们的日常生活质量。随着我国当前城镇化进程迅速发展,广大群众们对自身生活质量要求也日渐增大。给排水管道在建筑当中的投入使用,直接影响着当前广大群众们自身的生活水平和生活质量。本文针对给排水管道出现腐蚀问题的成因进行详细分析,其目的是研究出表面处理技术在给排水管道防腐中的应用途径。     

固相微萃取-便携式GC/MS快速测定水中痕量有机磷农药

采用固相微萃取-便携式气相色谱/质谱联用法（In situ SPME/GC-MS）分析地表水和废水中6种有机磷农药,通过优化测定条件,使6种有机磷农药在200 μg/L~500 μg/L范围内线性良好。方法检出限为033 μg/L～122 μg/L,低、高质量浓度标准溶液6次测定结果的RSD为68%~175%,加标回收率为849%~109%,与实验室方法的测定结果基本一致。     

Acidification Remediation Alternatives: Exploring the Temporal Dimension with Cost Benefit Analysis

Acidification of soils and surface waters caused by acid deposition is still a major problem in southern Scandinavia, despite clear signs of recovery. Besides emission control, liming of lakes, streams, and wetlands is currently used to ameliorate acidification in Sweden. An alternative strategy is forest soil liming to restore the acidified upland soils from which much acidified runoff originates. This cost–benefit analysis compared these liming strategies with a special emphasis on the time perspective for expected benefits. Benefits transfer was used to estimate use values for sport ffishing and nonuse values in terms of existence values. The results show that large-scale forest soil liming is not socioeconomically profitable, while lake liming is, if it is done efficiently—in other words, if only acidified surface waters are treated. The beguiling logic of “solving” an environmental problem at its source (soils), rather than continuing to treat the symptoms (surface waters), is thus misleading.