地震灾区分级和灾害程度排序方法研究——以汶川8.0级地震为例

根据汶川8.0级地震震害评估工作的具体实践,探讨了地震灾区分级和灾害程度排序的方法。通过房屋震害系数、强震加速度观测记录、发震构造、地震地质灾害和场地条件、人口分布及伤亡情况等影响因素来确定受灾程度,以烈度区、统计学方法、速报灾情等来确定灾区分级。     

粉尘性质对电除尘器性能影响的试验研究

在半工业化的电除尘器实验系统装置上进行了烧结灰、飞灰、煤铁混合样的粒径分布及粉尘的真密度对电除尘器性能影响的实验研究。结果表明,电除尘器能有效捕集亚微米粉尘,对烧结灰净化最适合的粒径范围为1．37～2．03μm(η高达100％);对煤铁混合样的最适合粒径范围为3．30～7．25μm(η高达100％);电除尘器对煤铁混合样的粒径小于2．24μm的分级效率η高达92．36％。在同等试验条件下,电除尘器对烧结灰和煤铁混合样的总除尘效率为96．87％,高于飞灰的总除尘效率92．61％。     

河北省农村土地流转与农村养老现状的实证研究

农村养老体系的有效建立,离不开农村最重要的土地资源,如何利用农村土地来优化农村养老体系,提升养老质量,就显得尤为重要。针对这一课题,笔者通过河北省农村基层建设年活动,对河北省不同县市的10个村500个农户进行了调查,查找农村土地流转和农村养老面临的问题和困境,并针对当前农村养老体系不健全,新旧养老保障模式衔接不畅和农村土地流转水平低下、流转形式单一的现状,提出农村土地制度的改革要为农村养老提供资金支持,要为新旧农村养老保障体系的转变提供便利的宏观建议。     

城市生活垃圾分类强制实施背景下“一主多元”治理模式的主体策略演化分析

随着经济不断发展和人民消费水平提升,垃圾分类治理问题日益严峻。实践经验表明,强制实施背景下政府主导与承包商、公众和环保组织为核心的多元主体共同参与的“一主多元”协作模式,对于我国垃圾分类治理具有较好适用性。但该模式也存在“一主”突出、“多元”不足及其他系统性冲突。为明确多元主体参与策略对“一主多元”治理模式稳定性的影响,首先,本文分析了城市生活垃圾分类强制实施背景下该模式运行机制及主体动因。然后,构建以承包商、公众和环保组织为主体的三方演化博弈系统,对不同策略组合下系统的演化结果进行演绎。最后,借助数值仿真分析了参与成本、环境收益和政府补贴对主体策略选择及系统稳定性的影响。结果表明：环保组织参与垃圾分类治理的积极性最高,公众最低;对于系统运行风险,承包商属于风险偏好者,环保组织属于风险回避者,公众属于风险中立者;承包商对参与成本最敏感,对政府补贴最不敏感,公众则正好与之相反;环境收益的提升有助于提高多元主体的参与积极性。这些发现对于如何提升多元主体参与垃圾分类治理的积极性及“一主多元”治理模式的运行效能具有启示意义。     

内循环动态膜生物反应器处理生活污水

利用筛绢为基材构建内循环动态膜生物反应器处理生活污水.在水力停留时间为6h,膜通量为66.2L/(m²·h)条件下,反应器内的生物动态膜需要120min可以形成.动态膜形成后,反应器对COD、氨氮、总氮(TN)和总磷(TP)的平均去除率分别为94.0%、97.6%、49.2%和83.7%.采用逆出水水流方向曝气进行在线反冲洗,在反冲洗时间为5min,反冲洗曝气强度为3.2m³/(m²·h)的条件下,生物动态膜的再生需要30min即可完成.反应器稳定运行60d,反冲洗周期能够稳定在50h以上.扫描电镜(SEM)观察表明,反冲洗能够有效破坏附着在膜基材上的生物动态膜.     

我国普及推广循环流化床锅炉的必要性及推广设想

循环流化床锅炉在环保、节能等方面效果显著,在我国推广应用有重大意义,文章对该技术在我国推广普及的必要性及基本原则和思路进行了论述.     

崇明岛开发的自然秉赋与制约

在2l世纪世界环境与发展相互协调的历史背景下，有着自然优势的崇明岛开发成为上海现代化发展第三次飞跃的战略性目标之一。从长江口和崇明岛发育自然和人工控制后自然适应演变规律的历史和现状，探讨实现崇明岛开发的自然秉赋与制约因素，近两千年来长江河口自然演变规律的分析结果表明：弯道侧向环流及其对泥沙的输运对河口沙坝和汉道发育演变以及流域内众多大型工程对河口环流结构的影响研究，将是对长江口综合治理的理论前提，更是崇明岛实现人与自然协调开发的基础。而且，风能、湿地生态功能和岛内沟河网的自然生态功能、湿地生态功能和岛内沟河网的自然生态功能等可再生资源的充分利用可以实现崇明岛的零污染开发和治理。     

Regional reference sites: a method for assessing stream potentials

Field assessments of impacted streams require a control or at least an unbiased estimate of attainable conditions. Control sites, such as upstream/downstream or wilderness sites, have proven inadequate for assessing attainable ecological conditions where the control streams differ naturally from the impacted streams to a considerable degree or where different disturbances exist than those being studied. Relatively undisturbed reference sites with watersheds in areas having the same land-surface form, soil, potential natural vegetation, and land use as are predominant in large, relatively homogeneous regions are suggested as alternative control sites. These areas are considered typical of the region and therefore the sites also are considered typical of the region because their watersheds exhibit all the terrestrial variables that make that region a region. The logical basis for developing regional reference sites lies in the ability to group watersheds and common stream types into regions by integrating available maps of terrestrial variables that influence streams. Relatively undisturbed reference sites can be selected from typical areas of the regions and from transition zones where one or two of the terrestrial variables are not the predominant one(s) of the region. These reference sites are useful for estimating attainable conditions, for evaluating temporal and spatial changes in ecological integrity, for classifying attainable uses of streams, and for setting biological and environmental criteria.     

A MATRIX AND ACCOMPANYING CLASSIFICATIONS FOR IDENTIFYING WATER RESEARCH PROBLEMS AND NEEDS1

ABSTRACT: A matrix was developed of problems with the functional use of water resources (rows) and functions served by water resources research (columns). A classification of water problems and a classification of research fields also were developed to accompany the matrix. The matrix and classification schemes were used when preparing the five-year research and development plan of the Water Resources Center of The Ohio State University. They were used: (1) to classify each research project that had been supported by the Water Resources Center from 1965 through 1980, (2) to guide interviews with personnel of federal and state agencies and university faculty who assisted in defining Ohio's water research needs, (3) to organize responses received during these interviews, and (4) to arrive at a selected list of ten problems with the functional use of Ohio's water resources that were prioritized based upon opinions received from water-related officials throughout the state. Other matrices and classification schemes are reviewed that were revised and expanded upon when formulating the ones used in Ohio. Suggestions are given regarding further development of the functional matrix and accompanying classifications as well as their use in administration of the cooperative federal-state water resources research program and other federal water resources research programs.