官地水电站竹子坝砂石加工系统生产废水处理

官地水电站竹子坝砂石生产系统生产废水处理采用“细砂回收＋絮凝沉淀＋清水回用＋泥浆（石粉）脱水”的分级处理与循环利用工艺和陶瓷过滤机作为生产废水中石粉终端脱水设备,在系统运行过程中,根据监测成果进行分析和改进,不仅解决了大坝碾压混凝土石粉需求,同时解决了砂石加工系统生产废水处理难题,使处理成本大幅降低,值得类似工程和Ⅱ类及以上水域功能的建设项目借鉴。     

生物活性炭曝气滤池处理油田废水的应用

为实现DB 12/356-2008《天津市污水综合排放标准》(CODCr≤60mg/L)要求,大港油田对原有的废水生化处理工艺进行技术升级改造,优选生物活性炭曝气滤池工艺作为工程改造的主体技术方案。现场实施后,各项水质指标均达到了天津市标准的要求,对大港油田工业废水深度处理工作具有实践指导意义。     

油田污水处理水质影响因素与改善措施

随着油田开发阶段的延长,污水处理系统能力出现不足,排污系统和日常排污以及收油是影响油田污水处理水质的重要因素。针对这些因素提出利用人工湿地对洗井、修井污水进行处理,减轻水处理站压力,通过合理加药提高除油罐除油效率,从含油污水进口进行杀菌,防止对管线设备的腐蚀,防止细菌菌体堵塞过滤器,过滤后根据细菌监测结果再次进行杀菌,保证出水合格等改善措施。     

环境适应性试验项目的选择

介绍低气压试验、高低温试验、湿热试验、IP防护等级试验、振动试验、冲击和碰撞试验、盐雾试验等试验项目的考核目的和相应试验参数,分析上述试验项目的适用范围。并根据当前产品的发展状况,简单介绍环境试验项目的组合和试验顺序。     

PM2.5及其工业源头控制技术

PM2.5对人体健康和空气质量有巨大的危害,环保部已修订相关法规和文件,将PM2.5纳入我国环境空气质量监测范围,采取有效手段控制PM2.5是我国一项重要的环保目标,在工业企业中采用最先进的表面过滤技术可从源头控制工业PM2.5的排放。     

电-袋复合式除尘器运行管理探讨

针对电-袋复合式除尘器的特点,分析了电-袋复合式除尘器在运行过程中应注意的事项,提出了电-袋复合式除尘工艺过程的运行管理要求,探讨了电-袋复合除尘器设备管理以及现场运行参数的设定,以实现提高电-袋复合式除尘器使用寿命及降低能耗的目的。     

聚苯硫醚新型滤料的特点及应用

介绍并分析了聚苯硫醚新型滤料的生产工艺及产品性能特点,提出了聚苯硫醚新型滤料在袋式除尘行业中的应用前景。     

A/O生化池和BAF生物滤池的组合应用

较为全面地介绍了A/O生化池和BAF生物滤池两级生化合并的应用原理和效果,对两级生化的进出水水质进行了分析,并对系统运行中存在的问题进行了阐述。     

Thermal removal of PCDD/Fs from medical waste incineration fly ash--effect of temperature and nitrogen flow rate

The fly ash used in this study was collected from a bag filter in a medical waste rotary kiln incineration system, using lime and activated carbon injection followed by their collection as mixed fly ash. Experiments were conducted on fly ash in a quartz tube, heated in a laboratory-scale horizontal tube furnace, in order to study the effect of temperature and nitrogen flow rate on the removal of PCDD/Fs. Results indicated that in this study PCDD/Fs in the fly ash mostly were removed and desorbed very little into the flue gas under thermal treatment especially when the heating temperature was higher than 350 °C, and dechlorination and destruction reactions took important part in the removal of PCDD/Fs. However, in terms of flow rate, when flow rate was higher than 4 cm s⁻¹, destruction efficiency of PCDD/Fs decreased dramatically and the main contributors were P₅CDF, H₆CDF and H₇CDF desorbed to flue gas, the PCDD/Fs in the fly ash decreased with enhanced flow rate.     

Activated soil filters for removal of biocides from contaminated run-off and waste-waters

Building facades can be equipped with biocides to prevent formation of algal, fungal and bacterial films. Thus run-off waters may contain these highly active compounds. In this study, the removal of several groups of biocides from contaminated waters by means of an activated soil filter was studied.A technical scale activated vertical soil filter (biofilter) with different layers (peat, sand and gravel), was planted with reed (Phragmites australis) and used to study the removal rates and fate of hydrophilic to moderate hydrophobic (log K_ow 1.8-4.4) biocides and biocide metabolites such as: Terbutryn, Cybutryn (Irgarol® 1051), Descyclopropyl-Cybutryn (Cybutryn and Terbutryn metabolite), Isoproturon, Diuron, and its metabolite Diuron-desmonomethyl, Benzo-isothiazolinone, n-Octyl-isothiazolinone, Dichloro-n-octylisothiazolinone and Iodocarbamate (Iodocarb). Three experiments were performed: the first one (36 d) under low flow conditions (61 L m⁻² d⁻¹) reached removal rates between 82% and 100%. The second one was performed to study high flow conditions: During this experiment, water was added as a pulse to the filter system with a hydraulic load of 255 L m⁻² within 5 min (retention time <1 h). During this experiment the removal rates of the compounds decreased drastically. For five compounds (Cybutryn, Descyclopropyl-Cybutryn, Diuron, Isoproturon, and Iodocarb) the removal dropped temporarily below 60%, while it was always above 70% for the others (Terbutryn, Benzo-isothiazolinone, n-Octyl-isothiazolinone, Dichloro-n-octylisothiazolinone). However, this removal is a considerable improvement compared to direct discharge into surface waters or infiltration into soil without appropriate removal. In the last experiment the removal efficiencies of the different layers were studied. Though the peat layer was responsible for most of the removal, the sand and gravel layers also contributed significantly for some compounds. All compounds are rather removed by degradation than by sorption.