上海市生活垃圾产业发展的思考

以构建生活垃圾产业为研究目的，通过对生活垃圾物质流和价值流的分析，探讨了生活垃圾产业发展的条件，提出了上海市生活垃圾产业构建的基本框架，并对上海生活垃圾产业的发展提出了对策及建议。     

战略环境评价的系统分析

介绍了战略环境评价系统的组成要素,即评价者、评价对象、评价目的、评价标准和评价方法,分析了其相互关系及各要素与战略环境评价系统的关系,通过对战略环境评价的战略结构分析,提出了战略环境评价的工作程序.     

Integrated environmental assessment and pollution prevention in Vietnam: the case of anthracite production

Using the concept of life cycle analysis, the whole life cycle of anthracite production in Vietnam was assessed and the environmental “hot-spots” were identified. These include (i) dust pollution at coal transfer points or piles in storage; (ii) noise pollution resulting from the usage of heavy equipment, and (iii) high volume of acid and turbid mine water discharged into the environment.Pollution prevention and treatment options were identified and discussed in this study which consists of wet treatment of dust, planning, collection and treatment of mine water, planting of trees for dust and noise reduction as well as minimization of erosion. Some recommendations are made for pollution abatement from coal production and improvement of anthracite production in the region.     

物元分析与灰色聚类法相结合的环境空气质量综合评价模型

本文提出运用物元分析与灰色聚类法相结合进行环境空气质量综合评价,用物元分析法建立了综合评判的物元模型,其中对于权重的确定,采用了灰色聚类权的方法,并运用该模型进行了实例研究。     

地塞米松生产中毒性物质泄漏的定性定量分析

采用预先危险性分析和事故树分析剖地塞米松生产过程中毒物质产生中毒事故的危险性。指出溴甲烷和氟化氢是典型毒物。同时，利用泄漏和扩散模型定量分析它们泄漏所造成的危险性。结果表明：溴甲烷泄漏时，地面轴线浓度可以达到９２．３ｍｇ／ｍ＾３，远大于其急性中毒阈值，并制定了相应的预防性工程措施。     

城郊道路交通污染个例分析

为建立和研究适合地面道路的宽路幅、高等级、支路多等特点的大城市城郊道路交通大气污染扩散模式,选取了受环境外来源影响较小的上海市沪青平公路的徐泾段,作交通大气污染实测和相关气象因子项目的观测。在获得详细实测结果的基础上,以NOx为例分析了大气稳定度、风向、风速、交通量对城郊地面道路交通污染扩散的影响。     

基于行业全产业链评估一份外卖订单的环境影响

构建"生产-运输-使用-废弃处置"的外卖全产业链，通过大样本企业调研与外卖平台大数据分析，计算8个样本城市不同材质与规格的外卖餐盒、餐具、包装袋的市场使用比例，挖掘骑手配送的海量数据，收集城市垃圾处理处置情况，系统评估外卖全过程的环境影响.结果表明，外卖包装物全产业链中生产环节（45%）与废弃处置环节（50%）为环境影响的主要来源，严重程度依次为固废排放、水污染、资源能源消耗和大气污染.所在城市及选用包装物材质的不同，外卖行业造成的环境影响会有显著区别，全产业链上的各环节需相互配合，多主体共同承担环境责任，采取差别化的减缓应对措施.     

潜在危害性指数法在筛选污染因子中的应用

介绍了潜在危害性指数法的基本原理和计算公式，通过某大型化工企业的实例，提出了应用的要求，并筛选出了企业的９项主要的环境监测因子。     

磺酰脲类除草剂的残留分析

磺酰脲类除草剂是一类新型超高效除草剂，大约包括２Ｖ化合物，已被广泛用于禾谷作物防除阔叶杂草以及某些禾本科杂草，该类除草剂在环境中的残留浓度〈１μｇ．ｋｇ＾－１水平。常规的分析方法包括生物鉴定，酶免疫分析，气相色谱法和高效液相色谱法（ＨＰＬＣ）、ＨＰＬＣ／ＭＳ联用后，可以准确测定复杂环境样中磺酰脲类除草剂的痕量残留。     

Fisheries management: integrating societal preference, decision analysis, and ecological risk assessment

Fisheries management is the practice of analyzing and selecting options to maintain or alter the structure, dynamics, and interaction of habitat, aquatic biota, and man to achieve human goals and objectives. The theory of fisheries management is: managers or decision makers attempt to maximize renewable `output' from an aquatic resource by choosing from among a set of decision options and applying a set of actions that generate an array of outputs. Outputs may be defined as a tangible catch, a fishing experience, an existence value, or anything else produced or supported by renewable aquatic resources. Overall output is always a mix of tangible and intangible elements. However defined, management goals and objectives are essential components of fisheries management or any other field of renewable natural resource management. Reaching consensus on management goals and objectives has never been a simple task. Beyond the broad and often conflicting goals of an agency, managers must decide who should set specific management objectives — agency personnel, the public, or a combination of the two. Historically, rhetoric aside, fisheries managers in North America nearly always have consulted with professionals in governmental roles to set management objectives. In a strongly pluralistic society, this often resulted in protracted political and legal conflict. Increasingly, there are calls for use of risk assessment to help solve such ecological policy and management problems commonly encountered in fisheries management. The basic concepts of ecological risk assessment may be simple, but the jargon and details are not. Risk assessment (and similar analytical tools) is a concept that has evoked strong reactions whenever it has been used. In spite of the difficulties of defining problems and setting management objectives for complex ecological policy questions, use of risk assessment to help solve ecological problems is widely supported. Ecological risk assessment will be most useful (and objective) in political deliberations when the policy debate revolves around largely technical concerns. To the extent that risk assessment forces policy debate and disagreement toward fundamental differences rather than superficial ones, it will be useful in decision making.