膨润土吸附-微波催化氧化协同处理葡萄酒废水

采用膨润土吸附-微波催化氧化技术处理葡萄酒生产废水,考察了膨润土用量、H2O2用量、微波辐照时间、微波功率、pH等5个单因素对葡萄酒生产废水处理效果的影响。确定了最终反应条件为:膨润土用量2.6 g、H2O2用量2.1mL、功率720 W、加热时间25 min、pH为3.5。在此条件下,COD去除率达到了80%以上。结果表明,该方法可快速有效地处理葡萄酒生产废水。     

微波辐射回用活性炭对水中亚甲基蓝和Cd2＋去除效果的研究

考察了微波-活性炭联合处理技术对模拟染料废水中亚甲基蓝和Cd2＋的去除效果。对于100 mL浓度为1 000 mg/L的亚甲基蓝溶液、活性炭用量为10 g时,新活性炭对亚甲基蓝的去除率为99.99%;采用700 W微波对吸附亚甲基蓝的活性炭辐射10 min进行再生并回用,经微波辐射再生10次后活性炭对亚甲基蓝的去除率为99.68%,未经微波作用反复使用10次的活性炭对亚甲基蓝的去除率为85.41%。结果表明：微波处理有效地减缓了活性炭吸附能力的下降速率,实现了活性炭再生和反复使用。在吸附过程中,Cd2＋使活性炭对亚甲基蓝的吸附能力略有下降,而共存的亚甲基蓝则促进了活性炭对Cd2＋的吸附,对新炭和再生后活性炭物理化学特性的表征证明了活性炭对亚甲基蓝的吸附为物理吸附,对Cd2＋的吸附为化学吸附。     

Fenton试剂预处理H酸废水的影响因素及其可生化性

采用Fenton度剂预处理低浓度难降解的H酸废水,探讨了pH,Fe^2 ,H2O2,反应时间和H酸浓度对废水CODcr去除效果的影响,结果表明,各因素对废水CODcr去除效果影响较大,对CODcr为810mg.l^-1的H酸废水,Fenton试剂预处理的最佳条件;pH为5.5,3%H2O2的观加量为5%,10g.l^-1FeSO4的投加量为7%,反应时间为90min,此条件下CODcr去除率为55.3%-58.7%,可生化值CODB/CODcr从6.3%-6.7%上升到62.2%-68.4%。     

水中异味物质分析方法研究进展

介绍了水体异味现象及异味物质组分,综述了闭环捕集、吹扫捕集、液液萃取、固相萃取、固相微萃取、搅拌棒吸附萃取等样品前处理技术。指出气相色谱/质谱联用具有很强的分离和定性定量能力,与上述前处理技术联用是目前水体异味物质分析应用最广泛的方法。     

微波消解石墨炉原子吸收法测定工业废气中铍及其化合物

采用玻璃纤维滤筒采集工业废气中铍及其化合物,硝酸-氢氟酸混酸体系微波消解滤筒、硝酸镁一硝酸混合液作为基体改进剂,石墨炉原子吸收法测定铍。本方法前处理操作过程简单、省时、酸用量少、环境污染小,方法的灵敏度和准确度都有很大的提高。当采样体积为30L,工业废气中铍的最低检出质量浓度为1×10μmg／m^3。     

不同酸消解体系测定大气颗粒物中的镉

采用微波消解-石墨炉原子吸收分光光度法测定北方某市环境空气PM10及PM2.5样品中的镉,并比较了硝酸-盐酸体系与硝酸-过氧化氢体系的消解效果。结果表明,硝酸-盐酸体系与硝酸-过氧化氢体系的方法检出限分别为0.006、0.008μg/L,相对偏差分别为5.4%、7.9%,加标回收率为85%~110%,其检出限、精密度与加标回收率均满足要求。2种消解体系均能较好地提取颗粒物中的镉,测定结果无显著差异(P0.05),但硝酸-过氧化氢体系更适合作为多种分析仪器测试通用的前处理体系。     

微波消解-石墨炉原子吸收法测定土壤中铊

通过研究土壤消解体系、混合基体改进剂的使用、石墨管类型的选择和标准加入定量过程对测定结果的影响,建立了适用于土壤中重金属铊的微波消解-平台石墨炉原子吸收方法。结果表明,使用HNO_3-HF-H_2O_2消解体系对土壤进行微波消解,石墨炉原子吸收测定过程采用Pd(NO_3)_2/Mg(NO_3)_2混合基体改进剂和平台石墨管,土壤中铊的检出限可达0.05 mg/kg,线性相关系数为0.996,加标回收率在95.0%~105.0%。使用该方法测得的结果与ICP-MS法比较,无统计学差异。改进后的方法具有简单快捷、灵敏度高、重现性好、线性范围广、结果准确等优势,易于推广使用。     

微波消解-紫外法测定水中总氮与国标方法的比较研究

将微波消解-紫外法测定总氮从方法检出限、校准曲线、精密度和准确度、实际样品测定4个方面与国标紫外法作了比较研究,进行了消解时间比对实验,说明了微波消解-紫外法测定总氮的注意事项。结果表明,微波消解-紫外法检出限为0.115 mg/L,高于国标紫外法;校准曲线具有较好线性相关系数,斜率与国标紫外法一致;方法精密性和准确性较好,实际样品测定结果与紫外法保持一致,在总氮监测中具有可行性。微波消解-紫外法节省了总氮监测的整个用时。     

A review on the production of fermentable sugars from lignocellulosic biomass through conventional and enzymatic route—a comparison

The scarcity of fossil fuels has urged the economically developed countries to find the resources for an alternative energy sources. In apprehension to this, biofuels, like bioethanol and biobutanol, produced from lignocellulosic biomass were considered as potential alternative. There are several methods for the pretreatment of biomass before it is being used as a feedstock for the production of fermentable sugars. However, one of the crucial concerns here is to enumerate an economic pretreatment scheme that can be implemented in large scale for the production of mostly exposed cellulosic part from biomass. This will ensure an effective hydrolysis of cellulose for the production of fermentable sugars and the production of biobutanol from these derived sugars. Moreover, the keynote understanding of an effective fermentation is the production of less inhibitory compounds like furfural, hydroxymethyl furfural during the hydrolysis of cellulose. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose was reported as the most efficient method is this aspect. Trichoderma sp. was found the mostly used resources for the enzyme called cellulase and Aspergillus sp. for hemicellulase enzymes. The most crucial part here is the isolation of proper enzyme that will increase the rate of hydrolysis. Moreover, selection of proper pretreatment process will be a key benefit to the production of fermentable sugars through enzymatic hydrolysis. Based on the biomass nature, the evaluated hot water pretreatment followed by enzymatic hydrolysis with a provision of enzyme reusability (like encapsulated or enzyme separation with membrane) seems to be promising for enhanced biofuel-production.     

Recent progress in bioethanol production from lignocellulosic materials: A review

Natural energy sources like petrol and diesel are going to be diminished in the coming future which will lead to increase in the prices and demands of fossil fuels. Therefore, it is important to find a sustainable alternate of fossil fuels. Bioethanol is one of the alternatives, which is produced from different feedstocks including sugar-based, starch-based and lignocellulose-based materials through fermentation. Since sugar-based (sugar cane and sugar beet) and starch-based (corn) materials are sources of staple food, therefore, research on lignocellulosic materials for bioethanol production is a subject of recent studies. Ethanol production from lignocellulosic materials involves different steps, such as pretreatment, hydrolysis, followed by fermentation process and finally ethanol purification. In this review, we have summarized the recent progresses in bioethanol production and processing from lignocellulosic materials.