The sonographic diagnosis of chorionicity

The differentiation between mono- and dichorionic placentation in twin pregnancies is of clinical importance because of the significant difference in perinatal morbidity and mortality between the two, and the increased surveillance indicated in monochorionic gestations. Application of ultrasonography has enabled very precise prenatal determination of chorionicity. While this is best performed in the first trimester when accuracy approaches 100%, even in the third trimester, using a composite cascade of available sonographic features, accuracy has been reported to approach 97%. While two clearly separate placentae or discordant fetal gender conform to dichorionicity, in most twin pregnancies other features need to be assessed to determine chorionicity. The presence of the ‘lambda’ or the ‘T’ sign in the presence of a single placenta, best determined in the first trimester, is the most reliable indicator of chorionicity, with measurements of the inter-twin membrane thickness and counting of the membrane layers being less reliable. In this article, we review the sonographic features that help in the accurate depiction of chorionicity. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Discordant growth in twins

Discordant growth in twins contributes significantly to rates of perinatal morbidity and mortality. These rates vary according to chorionicity, timing of onset and severity. We have reviewed English language literature in Medline since 1980. It is clear that diagnosis of discordant growth has improved due to the use of serial ultrasound examination. Following the detection of differences in fetal size, diagnosis is facilitated by umbilical artery and fetal Doppler studies. Management options vary according to chorionicity, timing of onset and umbilical-fetal Doppler studies. The mode of delivery in discordant twins remains controversial. We conclude that ultrasound surveillance of twin gestations, combining serial biometry and selective Doppler studies, is effective in the recognition of siginificant intrauterine growth restriction in co-twins. Differences in etiology and management underscore the imortance of establishing chorionicity routinely as soon as twin gestation is diagnosed. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies

Selective intrauterine growth restriction (sIUGR) occurs in 10 to 15% of monochorionic (MC) twins, and it is associated with a substantial increase in perinatal mortality and morbidity. Clinical evolution is largely influenced by the existence of intertwin placental anastomoses: pregnancies with similar degrees of fetal weight discordance are associated with remarkable differences in clinical behavior and outcome. We have proposed a classification of sIUGR into three types according to umbilical artery (UA) Doppler findings (I-normal, II-absent/reverse end-diastolic flow, III-intermittent absent/reverse end-diastolic flow), which correlates with distinct clinical behavior, placental features and may assist in counseling and management. In terms of prognosis, sIUGR can roughly be divided in two groups: type I cases, with a fairly good outcome, and types II and III, with a substantial risk for a poor outcome. Management of types II and III may consist in expectant management until deterioration of the IUGR fetus is observed, with the option of cord occlusion if this occurs before viability. Alternatively, active management can be considered electively, including cord occlusion or laser coagulation. Both therapies seem to increase the chances of intact survival of the larger fetus, while they entail, or increase the chances of, intrauterine demise of the IUGR fetus. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.