矿产资源进口战略的陷阱及其对策

我国矿产总量丰富、品种齐全，但随着经济的高速发展，总体上资源出现相对短缺，结构性矛盾突出，因此必须实施矿产资源进口战略。由于种种原因，在战略实施过程中常会发生“变形”，从而产生种种可怕的陷阱。为了保障我国国家经济安全、繁荣矿业事业、促进矿产资源的合理开发利用，作者就如何避开这些陷阱提出了有关对策。     

现代企业人力资源战略分析

人力资源的战略化管理是知识经济时代的必然要求和未来发展趋势。人力资源战略处于企业职能战略的核心地位，通过对企业人力资源战略分析必须考虑的内、外部环境因素的研究，提出了现代企业人力资源战略分析的基本理论框架，并对企业实施人力资源战略化管理进行了理论探索。     

榆林地区甘草资源的开发与利用

根据对陕西省榆林地区甘草资源的调查研究，论述了甘草的生物学特征、分布、开发利用价值、栽培技术和经济效益，并提出了开发利用甘草资源的建议。     

我国青少年学生旅游市场营销策略

分析了青少年旅游市场开发的可行性，在了解青少年学生消费心理及行为特征的基础上。有针对性地提出了青少年学生旅游市场的营销策略。从而突破我国原有的以观光产品为主的旅游产品类型。推进我国旅游业的可持续发展。     

State Park Directors' Perceptions of Mountain Biking

/ This study intended to explore the perceptions of mountain bikingmanagement through a mail survey of state park directors in all 50 states.With a 100% response rate, it was found that 47 states permit mountainbiking in their state parks, however, few state parks have formalized plansto manage this outdoor activity. The management policies that do exist arenot followed on a statewide basis but vary within each state and at eachstate park. Many states have worked cooperatively with local mountain bikingclubs to develop and maintain mountain bike trails, promote rider education,and provide volunteer patrols on trails. The issue of user conflict surfacedwith almost three-fourths of the managers responding that conflict existedbetween mountain bikers and other trail users. This preliminary study shouldprompt further research with on-site managers focusing on the use ofmanagement plans for mountain biking, cooperation between managers and usergroups, and user conflict. It is recommended that an Internet-basedinformation clearinghouse or discussion group be made available to landmanagers by a national bicycling organization.KEY WORDS: Mountain biking; State parks; State park directors;Recreation resource management     

海南特区农村剩余劳动力资源的开发与利用

本文论述了海南特区农村剩余劳动力资源的现状及其影响劳动力资源开发利用的主要因素，提出了海南特区农村剩余劳动力资源开发与利用的途径。     

湖北旅游资源特征与分区

本文在分析湖北省旅游资源的赋存状况和特征基础上，提出了湖北旅游的分区方案，包括鄂东综合旅游，鄂中名胜古迹，鄂西北山岳风光和鄂西南峡谷溶洞与民俗风情４大旅游区，旨在为湖北区域旅游开发与产业布局提供理论依据。     

The community vs. the market and the state: Forest use inUttarakhand in the Indian Himalayas

Most writers on resource management presume that local populations, if they act in their self-interest, seldom conserve or protect natural resources without external intervention or privatization. Using the example of forest management by villagers in the Indian Himalayas, this paper argues that rural populations can often use resources sustainably and successfully, even under assumptions of self-interested rationality. Under a set of specified social and environmental conditions, conditions that prevail in large areas of the Himalayas and may also exist in other mountain regions, community institutions are more efficient in managing resources than either private individuals or the central government. In advancing this argument, the paper undermines the often dogmatic belief in the universal superiority of private forms of ownership and management.     

Adaptive management: Promises and pitfalls

Proponents of the scientific adaptive management approach argue that it increases knowledge acquisition rates, enhances information flow among policy actors, and provides opportunities for creating shared understandings. However, evidence from efforts to implement the approach in New Brunswick, British Columbia, Canada, and the Columbia River Basin indicates that these promises have not been met. The data show that scientific adaptive management relies excessively on the use of linear systems models, discounts nonscientific forms of knowledge, and pays inadequate attention to policy processes that promote the development of shared understandings among diverse stakeholders. To be effective, new adaptive management efforts will need to incorporate knowledge from multiple sources, make use of multiple systems models, and support new forms of cooperation among stakeholders.     

SOUND POLICY OR SMOKE AND MIRRORS: DOES ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT MAKE SENSE?1

ABSTRACT: Protection of ecosystems as entities on the landscape has attracted a wide range of support. Ecosystem-based public policies are claimed to be more effective, efficient, and scientifically sound than other approaches to environmental and natural resource policy. The ecosystem concept was never intended to serve as a public policy guide or to determine landscape units for land management purposes. This paper critically examines the use of the ecosystem concept in public policy and land use management and analyzes the proposed rule to manage the National Forest System according to ecosystem management principles. The concept is found to be unsuitable as a basis for guiding environmental and natural resource public policies in general while the proposed rule to manage the national forests according to ecosystem management principles is shown to be incoherent.