Sustainable co-evolution

Humankind is dependent upon Earth's ecological life support system, whose well-being, in turn, depends upon the practices of human society. The health of both systems requires harmonious, mutualistic interactions between them. Because of its population size and demographic distribution (increasingly urbanized), humankind is also dependent upon its technological life support system, which, as currently managed, threatens the ecological life support system. A fundamental difference exists between the two systems—humankind is capable of using intelligence and reason to regulate its activities but the 30+ million other life forms that comprise the ecological life support system cannot. As a consequence, empathy for the other system is the responsibility of human society. Sustainable co-evolution requires that human society has a high level of ecological literacy and acts in a nurturing, compassionate way toward the other system. Only then will sustainable co-evolution be possible since both systems are dynamic and continually changing.     

A proposal for environmental indicators towards industrial building sustainable assessment

The construction sector carries out a very important role in the development of society. It is a basic component of economic activity, having a great influence on employment generation and country growth. The sector generates appreciable environmental changes and effects throughout the planet, leading to gradual exhaustion of natural resources and contamination of basic elements, such as air, water and soil. Recently, there have been advances in favour of more environmentally friendly buildings. Basically, sustainable construction has centred on residential and office buildings. It could be said that there is a lack of sustainability in the construction of industrial buildings, as they present characteristics which differ from other building typologies. This article aims to assess and analyze industrial building environmental effects, and considers a set of green study criteria, such as: location, materials, energy and water consumption, construction and deconstruction characteristics, and waste management in industrial building. At the same time, the studies are hierarchically structured into different assessment elements, such as: criteria, subcriteria and, finally, indicators, comprising the assessment model.     

Implementing a new model to measure and assess eco-effectiveness as an indicator of sustainability

A model able to measure eco-effectiveness, which was theoretically proposed and illustrated in a previous article, is here developed and implemented for three case studies (USA, EU-15 and Japan) in order to verify its potential usefulness in the natural resources field. The results obtained by the application of the 'loss function' – ability to measure the distance between a real and an ideal situation – show that the model can be seen as a fundamental basis to assess the exploitation intensity of resources among different countries/areas and/or over time, especially if new measures and best environmental practices are adopted to increase resource productivity and to reduce environmental burdens. Since a main issue in the model implementation is related to the subjective choice of weights to be given to the various resources in the loss function (materials, fossil fuels and biomass), a graphical approach based on a 'weighting triangle' is also proposed to overcome the problem of previous weight selection. This tool permits us to make a distinction between a 'non-sustainability' area and a 'sustainability' area, based on whether an increase or a decrease of the loss function is more plausible.     

Eco-efficiency or/and eco-effectiveness? Shifting to innovative paradigms for resource productivity

Eco-efficiency has been pursued over the last two decades in different industries and branches. But, despite the fact that the culture and economic advantage in this direction have improved considerably, this paradigm must be considered a limitation if related to the necessity of greatly increasing resource productivity (at least by ten times), within sustainability. As a consequence of this, the new paradigm of co-effectiveness must be introduced and spread within all economies, in order to modify the type of development. This concept is outlined and discussed here, by taking as reference the 'ideal state', consisting of the use of zero resources (energy, materials, water, etc.) in all economic systems. Since this target cannot be achieved, it may be defined as 'state of bliss' and, in each different situation (branch of industry, services, whole economy), it is only possible to measure the 'distance' between a real situation and the 'ideal state', through a specific formula that is here reported. The distance can be obtained by using the energy and the material intensity at micro and macro levels. This formula permits both the obtaining of absolute figures and the comparison of different situations in the same branch of industry at different times and/or in different countries, and between different countries as a whole.     

Social cost–benefit analysis of Karnataka Watershed Development (KAWAD) project,Karnataka, India

This paper presents results of a social cost–benefit analysis (CBA) of afforestation and soil moisture treatment of common lands under an integrated watershed development programme in Karnataka State, India. The aim of the study was to find out if soil moisture conservation and afforestation measures were justified in terms of economic efficiency. The assessment was undertaken by calculating the economic internal rate of return (EIRR) for five village common lands in two watersheds, Uparhalla and Chinnahagari, in central Karnataka. Focused group discussions were organised, using a semi-structured questionnaire and various stakeholders, including project implementing agencies, self help groups and other community-based organisations. The attractiveness of the programme in both watersheds for landless and land owners was high in three out of five sampled villages, with an EIRR ranging from 19% to 91%, while two villages in Chinnahagari watershed had extremely low EIRR, reflecting poor management of soil moisture and afforestation interventions and lack of institutional cohesion to sustain investments made to develop common lands. Therefore, the CBA conducted in the KAWAD project, except for two villages, shows that the investment made to develop common lands should yield substantial economic returns in the long term under a business as usual scenario.