A framework for assessing the impact of land use policy on community exposure to air toxics

Our research focuses on the linkage between land use planning policy and the spatial pattern of exposure to air toxics emissions. Our objective is to develop a modeling framework for assessment of the community health risk implications of land use policy. The modeling framework is not intended to be a regulatory tool for small-scale land use decisions, but a long-range planning tool to assess the community health risk implications of alternative land use scenarios at a regional or subregional scale. This paper describes the development and application of an air toxic source model for generating aggregate emission factors for industrial and commercial zoning districts as a function of permitted uses. To address the uncertainty of estimating air toxics emission rates for planned general land use or zoning districts, the source model uses an emissions probability mass function that weights each incremental permitted land use activity by the likelihood of occurrence. We thus reduce the uncertainty involved in planning for development with no prior knowledge of the specific industries that may locate within the land use district. These air toxics emission factors can then be used to estimate pollutant atmospheric mass flux from land use zoning districts, which can then be input to air dispersion and human health risk assessment models to simulate the spatial pattern of air toxics exposure risk. The model database was constructed using the California Air Toxics Inventory, 1997 US Economic Census, and land assessment records from several California counties. The database contains information on more than 200 air toxics at the 2-digit Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) level. We present a case study to illustrate application of the model. LUAIRTOX, the interactive spreadsheet model that applies our methodology to the California data, is available at http://www2.bren.ucsb.edu/~mwillis/LUAIRTOX.htm.     

The integrated project AquaTerra of the EU sixth framework lays foundations for better understanding of river-sediment-soil-groundwater systems

The integrated project "AquaTerra" with the full title "integrated modeling of the river-sediment-soil-groundwater system; advanced tools for the management of catchment areas and river basins in the context of global change" is among the first environmental projects within the sixth Framework Program of the European Union. Commencing in June 2004, it brought together a multidisciplinary team of 45 partner organizations from 12 EU countries, Romania, Switzerland, Serbia and Montenegro. AquaTerra is an ambitious project with the primary objective of laying the foundations for a better understanding of the behavior of environmental pollutants and their fluxes in the soil-sediment-water system with respect to climate and land use changes. The project performs research as well as modeling on river-sediment-soil-groundwater systems through quantification of deposition, sorption and turnover rates and the development of numerical models to reveal fluxes and trends in soil and sediment functioning. Scales ranging from the laboratory to river basins are addressed with the potential to provide improved river basin management, enhanced soil and groundwater monitoring as well as the early identification and forecasting of impacts on water quantity and quality. Study areas are the catchments of the Ebro, Meuse, Elbe and Danube Rivers and the Brévilles Spring. Here we outline the general structure of the project and the activities conducted within eleven existing sub-projects of AquaTerra.     

Environmental Equity and the Role of Public Policy: Experiences in the Rijnmond Region

This Φ Ψ study of environmental equity uses secondary quantitative data to analyze socioeconomic disparities in environmental conditions in the Rijnmond region of the Netherlands. The disparities of selected environmental indicators—exposure to traffic noise (road, rail, and air), NO₂, external safety risks, and the availability of public green space—are analyzed both separately and in combination. Not only exposures to environmental burdens (“bads”) were investigated, but also access to environmental benefits (“goods”). Additionally, we held interviews and reviewed documents to grasp the mechanisms underlying the environmental equity situation, with an emphasis on the role of public policy. Environmental equity is not a priority in public policy for the greater Rotterdam region known as the Rijnmond region, yet environmental standards have been established to provide a minimum environmental quality to all local residents. In general, environmental quality has improved in this region, and the accumulation of negative environmental outcomes (“bads”) has been limited. However, environmental standards for road traffic noise and NO₂ are being exceeded, probably because of the pressure on space and the traffic intensity. We found an association of environmental “bads” with income for rail traffic noise and availability of public green space. In the absence of regulation, positive environmental outcomes (“goods”) are mainly left up to market forces. Consequently, higher-income groups generally have more access to environmental “goods” than lower-income groups.     

用清洁生产的理念防治农业污染的初步探讨

农业发展面临的农业污染问题,已成为制约农业可持续发展的＂瓶颈＂.农业污染问题已经成为影响农村经济发展,以及农村社会和谐发展的重要因素之一.在论述农业清洁生产涵义的基础上,探讨了农业清洁生产防治农业污染问题.以新疆绿洲农业为例,论述了农业污染现状及发展农业清洁生产的必要性,分析探讨了发展农业清洁生产存在的问题和障碍,并提出了对策和建议.     

WRF-Chem与ADMS对城区尺度大气污染精细化模拟的比较

精细化模拟对城市大气污染预报、朔源和管控具有重要意义.本文以南京市江宁区为例,利用中尺度数值模式WRF-Chem和三维高斯型模式ADMS,针对典型污染个例,开展城区尺度大气污染高分辨模拟,并对其结果进行比较分析.此外,探讨了WRF-Chem中不同城市冠层方案的模拟效果以及ADMS中不同街道峡谷特征对街道内污染扩散的影响.结果表明,WRF-Chem和ADMS都可以合理模拟内外源对关心区域的影响,实现对城区尺度大气污染的高分辨和高效率模拟;相对SLAB、BEP城市冠层方案,WRF-Chem中的UCM方案表现更好,且其模拟性能较ADMS略优;ADMS模拟街道峡谷效应时,街道和建筑尺度参数对模拟结果有较大影响,街道越窄、建筑越高,越不利于街道内污染物的扩散.综合而言,对于城区尺度的大气污染精细化模拟,使用UCM方案的WRF-Chem和ADMS都具有一定的模拟能力,可以根据计算效率和分辨率的要求选用不同模型开展研究.     

臭氧氧化印染工业园废水的效能与机理研究

本研究开展了印染废水臭氧氧化影响因素、降解动力学和淬灭实验,测定了自由基物种、降解产物和琥珀酸脱氢酶活性.结果表明,苯胺去除效率随着pH值、臭氧投加量和臭氧投加速率的增加分别逐渐减小、增加和减小,且臭氧浓度为24 mg·L^-1时苯胺去除效率最高.臭氧氧化苯胺的适宜条件为：臭氧浓度为24 mg·L^-1、臭氧投加量为200 mg·L^-1和臭氧投加速率为4 mg·min^-1,此时苯胺的去除效率为47.2%.臭氧氧化苯胺是直接氧化为主结合羟基自由基反应的作用过程.苯胺脱氨基和裂解苯环后生成戊二酸或L-焦谷氨酸直至矿化.大肠杆菌在原水和臭氧氧化后废水中的酶抑制率分别为83.4%和24.7%.臭氧氧化前处理后,混凝去除色度、SS、COD、总氮、总磷、硫化物和苯胺的效能分别提高了0.72%、0.46%、31.40%、9.40%、22.80%、31.40%和63.30%.研究结果为臭氧氧化印染工业园废水前处理的应用提供了基础依据.     

铁基硅盐对土壤环境镉砷赋存形态及转化影响

为探明铁基硅盐对土壤镉砷赋存形态影响及各形态间转化规律,采用室内长期淹水培养吸附实验,研究不同比例铁硅材料对土壤离子态镉砷活性影响;筛选适宜铁基硅盐(FS)配比同时添加腐殖酸(FSC)和金属氧化物(FSCa),明确复配处理土壤中镉砷分级形态转化程度.结果显示,铁:硅比值增加10%,土壤pH值平均降低0.35;F₂-S₈处理土壤离子态镉降幅71%;F₁₀-S₀处理土壤离子态砷降低59.9%,离子态镉砷含量与硅酸盐-铁盐施用量互呈反比;处理F₄-S₆和F₆-S₄之间镉、砷钝化率产生交点,约为25%~30%.土壤中镉主要以可溶态为主,占比58%;砷主要以铁铝氧化态和钙结合态为主,占比40%和23%.铁硅比例为5:5或5.5:4.5左右复配能有效将铝结合态砷和铁铝氧化态砷转变为钙结合态砷和残渣态砷,可溶态镉转化为碳酸盐结合态镉以及铁锰氧化态镉,同步降低土壤中镉砷的活性.     

南京秋冬季非难熔性亚微米颗粒物来源解析

利用Aerodyne高分辨率飞行时间气溶胶质谱仪（HR-ToF-AMS）对南京北郊秋冬季非难熔性亚微米气溶胶（NR-PM₁）的化学组分（包括有机物、硝酸盐、硫酸盐、铵盐和氯化物）和特征进行实时在线监测,并利用多元线性模型（ME-2）对其中复杂的有机物进行来源解析.观测期间,有机物、硝酸盐、硫酸盐、铵盐、氯化物对NR-PM₁的贡献分别为42%,28%,15%,13%和2%.有机物解析出6类有机气溶胶：烃类有机气溶胶（HOA）、烹饪类有机气溶胶（COA）、生物质燃烧有机气溶胶（BBOA）、高氧化有机气溶胶（MO-OOA）、低氧化有机气溶胶（LO-OOA）、液相反应生成氧化有机气溶胶（aq-OOA）,平均浓度分别占总有机气溶胶的18%,14%,19%,19%,11%和19%.通过不同污染事件的对比结果表明,本次观测期间二次气溶胶在污染时期占比会明显上升并且液相反应对二次组分的形成有显著的促进作用.     

武汉军运会前后臭氧及其前体物的特征和来源

利用湖北省超级站2019年10~11月的臭氧、NO_x(=NO+NO₂)和102种VOCs物质的小时数据分析了军运会期间臭氧污染变化;基于DSMACC箱型模式模拟不同VOCs和NO_x浓度下臭氧的光化学生成敏感性;采用PMF模型对前体物VOCs进行源解析,并估算不同源类的臭氧生成潜势.结果显示,军运会保障前臭氧日最大8小时浓度(最大MDA8:219.51μg/m³)超过国家二级标准,保障期臭氧MDA8浓度(135.11μg/m³)明显下降,保障后浓度回升(140.98μg/m³).军运会保障前中期臭氧浓度的差异受气象条件影响更明显,而保障后臭氧浓度的上升主要是因为前体物浓度的大幅增加.根据DSMACC模拟的EKMA曲线,武汉市军运会期间臭氧的光化学生成主要受VOCs浓度变化的影响.进一步对VOCs进行源解析,结果显示,保障前VOCs对臭氧生成贡献较大的源类是燃烧源、石油化工和机动车,分别占23.0%、22.8%和22.5%;保障期间VOCs的主要来源是机动车(38.4%)和燃烧源(25.5%);保障后则主要是石油化工(32.6%)和燃料挥发(25.7%).三个阶段对比发现,军运会的保障方案对石油化工源减排效果明显,但对机动车和燃烧源排放的限制效果并不显著.武汉市应该更注重对燃烧、燃料挥发和机动车排放的治理.     

天津市减污降碳协同效应评估与预测

为评估和预测天津市减污降碳协同效应,采用减排量弹性系数法评估减污降碳协同效应,基于STIRPAT模型预测天津市“十四五”期间的减污降碳协同效应,并分情景预测天津市2026~2060年的减污降碳协同效应.结果表明：大气污染当量和温室气体的主要排放源均为工业源;2015~2017年天津市减污降碳协同效应系数范围为0.11~0.26,2013~2014年和2018~2020年天津市的减污降碳协同效应系数均小于0;天津市“十四五”期间减污降碳协同效应系数为0.06;各种情景下,2026~2060年天津市减污降碳协同效应系数均大于0.天津市2011~2020年减污降碳协同效应波动变化,“十四五”时期或可进入减污降碳协同增效阶段.天津市要在2026~2060年实现较高水平的减污降碳协同增效,就需要合理控制城镇化率、人口总数和地区生产总值,增加第三产业比重和高技术比重,持续降低能源强度.