洱源县村镇环境问题初探

洱源县村镇环境存在生活污染，农业二次污染和乡镇企业污染严重，生态环境恶化等问题，应健全乡镇环保助理员制度，加强基础设施建设的同时，加强对乡镇企业的规划，调整其产业和产品结构，坚持环评制度，改善农村能源结构。     

小城镇发展现状与水污染问题

小城镇发展带来水污染问题，应做好小城镇环境保护管理和规划，研究污水处置技术开发和污水厂运营方式改革。     

中国古代城市防火减灾措施研究

论文探讨并整理出中国古代城市发展中形成一套行之有效的防火措施。这些防火技术具有一定的科学性．     

对平遥古城居民旅游感知的分析研究

旅游地居民对旅游影响的感知是研究旅游影响性质及程度的重要途径。在实地调研的基础上,分析了平遥古城居民对旅游经济、社会文化、环境影响的感知程度及其对旅游业的态度,比较了不同人口学特征及与旅游业关系密切程度不同的居民对旅游影响的感知和对旅游业态度的差异,提出了进一步提高古城居民旅游感知的建议。     

Chemistry of groundwater in Gulbarga district, Karnataka, India

Groundwater quality of Gulbarga District is extensively monitored for two years of study period from October 1999 to September 2001. Twenty-five different sampling stations were selected for the study purpose in the city and five selected villages in the district. Gulbarga districts lies in the northern plains of Karnataka State, covers an area of 16,244 km² and lies between 16°-11′ and 17°-19′N latitude and 76°-54′E longitude The study revealed that the water sources in the area are heavily polluted. The major water quality parameters exceeding the permissible limits during all the seasons are total hardness, calcium hardness, magnesium hardness, alkalinity and MPN (Bacterial count) and other parameters have shown distinctive variation in different stations and season. Most of these parameters are correlated with one another. Statistical analysis of the data is presented.     

扬州古运河底泥重金属污染潜在生态危害评价

对扬州古运河底泥重金属污染潜在生态危害进行了调查与评价。结果表明,古运河各监测断面的潜在生态危害指数等级为轻微至强。经综合整治,2002年后古运河重金属污染潜在生态危害指数较2002年之前显著下降。下游因曾经工厂聚集,污染程度高于上游,毒性系数较大的Cd和Hg的潜在生态危害始终排在首位。     

江苏省淮安市赵集镇旅游开发战略研究

乡镇旅游开发战略决定着乡镇旅游的发展成败。从分析旅游开发战略环境、确立战略指导思想、构建战略原则、确定开发战略定位、落实战略重点、推进战略措施、设置战略项目等方面论述了江苏省淮安市赵集镇的旅游开发战略模式。     

Leadership and lesson-drawing in the European Union’s multilevel climate governance system

ABSTRACT

The important role that climate leaders and leadership play at different levels of the European Union (EU) multilevel governance system is exemplified. Initially, climate leader states set the pace with ambitious policy measures that were adopted largely on an ad hoc basis. Since the mid-1980s, the EU has developed a multilevel climate governance system that has facilitated leadership and lesson-drawing at all governance levels including the local level. The EU has become a global climate policy leader by example although it had been set up as a ‘leaderless Europe’. The resulting ‘leadership without leader’ paradox cannot be sufficiently explained merely by reference to top-level EU climate policies. Local-level climate innovations and lesson-drawing have increasingly been encouraged by the EU’s multilevel climate governance system which has become more polycentric. The recognition of economic co-benefits of climate policy measures has helped to further the EU’s climate leadership role.