Rural-urban Migration,Rural Household Income and Sustainable Development in Rural Areas of China

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to investigate the relationships among rural-urban migration, rural household income and sustainable development in rural areas of China. The typical case study is done and 288 questionnaires are collected from five villages in Hebei and Guangxi provinces, China. The migration and remittance status, household income and sustainable development of rural areas are analyzed on the basis of questionnaires. Rural-urban migration is becoming a part of routine life in rural areas. And remittance is an important component in rural household income. Rural-urban migration increases the arable land area per labor, which releases the tight human-land relationship in villages. In total, the migration increases the rural household income and accelerates the sustainable development of rural areas.     

基于多因素的我国城乡收入差距实证分析

本文从宏观经济学“收入=消费＋储蓄”这个恒等式和我国经济、人口的相关数据,动态上测算出不同时期我国城市居民和农村居民的收入,总体上估计了我国城乡收入差距的大小,其结果更接近当前我国社会的现实。由此可以看出我国城乡收入差距将有不断扩大的必然趋势。本文进一步把城乡收入差距分解为消费差距和储蓄差距,并且考察了我国人口和产业的演进,分析了它们各自对现在和今后形成差距的影响,表明我国城乡收入差距不断扩大的原因是：城乡资源占有不均等的制度和由于制度原因形成的存量资产（储蓄）又在市场作用下继续拉大差距的双重因素。所以,政府不仅要使农民“减负”、“增收”,而且要运用法律、财政、税收等手段,多管齐下,改变目前的资源分配格局,方能解决“三农”问题之痼疾。     

土地流转与农户收入增长——基于收入结构的视角

农户参与土地流转能否产生正的收入效应是一个广为社会各界关注的问题,然而已有的经验研究结论却大相径庭,文章以为对土地流转异质性影响的忽视是导致诸多土地流转收入效应研究结论不一致的关键。基于此,文章应用2010—2018五轮中国家庭追踪调查数据(CFPS),分析土地流转对不同农户类型、不同收入来源的影响差异。基本实证结果表明:第一,土地流转确实会增加农户收入,但是主要表现为对转出农户有正的收入效应,对转入农户的家庭纯收入影响并不明显。第二,土地流转对转入农户与转出农户的不同类型收入的影响并不一致。转出户工资性收入增长幅度远高于经营性收入下降幅度,工资性收入对转出户家庭纯收入的增长贡献接近80%;转入户的经营性收入增长无法弥补工资性收入下降,导致家庭总收入水平没有显著变化。以上实证结果经双重差分模型、处理效应模型等一系列模型敏感性分析后并未改变,表明文章的基本结论是稳健的。进一步地,文章对收入异质性的原因进行分析,发现土地流转对不同农户的劳动力资源配置决策影响存在差异,转出户外出务工与创业的概率增加,非农生产的劳动力投入增加;而转入户则在农业生产中投入更多资源,包括家庭农业劳动参与增加以及农业投入增加。文章进一步的政策讨论也发现,由于转出农户对技术改进的依赖性较弱,转出农户只需要保证能够找到一份替代工作就可以获得更高的收入;但对转入农户而言,由于缺乏足够的技术帮扶,所以他们的土地生产改进有限,反而难以产生土地流转理论提到的资源配置优化,这可能会限制土地流转市场的进一步扩大。综上,文章研究为优化土地流转政策、提高土地流转参与率,并最终实现农户的社会福利改善提供了一定的理论与经验证据支持。     

新型农村社会养老保险收入再分配效应研究

通过政策分析发现,新农保制度的收入再分配效应主要体现在政府补贴方面,在本质上是财政的再分配,其中个人账户部分体现为代内再分配,基础养老金部分体现为代际再分配。新农保制度几乎对所有制度内人群都具有正的收入再分配效应。以净转移额来度量新农保收入再分配效应的程度,通过建立模型进行测算发现:在现行财政补贴政策下,新农保的收入再分配偏向于选择较高档次缴费的人群、缴费困难群体、寿命长的人群、女性农民、长期缴费的人群以及农村计划生育家庭;政府缴费补贴越多,个人账户投资收益率越高,基础养老金调整系数越大,参保人养老金的净转入额就越多;"捆绑式缴费"政策产生了逆向的收入再分配效应。     

Humble Opinions on the Relationship between the Percentage of Urban Residents in an Urban Region and the Economic Status in This Region in China

It is a fact that in U.S. the immigration between rural areas and city areas is free, but in China this type of immigration is restricted by HUKOU system （Hukou, namely the household registration system, was designed to control rural-urban in China）. All of those national policies in city areas are much better than those in rural areas, so those corresponding differences bring about great discrepancy of the economic status （mainly including GDP per person and income per resident） between rural and city areas in the same urban region, especially in different urban re- gions because the percentage of urban residents in those urban regions is in-equable. The present paper mainly researches the topic of relationship between the percentage of urban residents and the economic status in an urban region in China, including the relationship between the economic and the political functions of a settlement in China during the process of urbanization.     

信息对农民增收的影响及效应分析

通过建立模型,分析了信息对农民收入的影响,结果显示,信息量、信息渠道对信息的扭曲等严重制约了农民收入的提高;目前,我国农民信息渠道单一,信息量小已经成为制约农民收入增长的重要影响因素。     

保留带与造林带水土和养分再分配效应

保留带（ 保留现有灌丛的带状区域）与造林带（ 砍掉现有灌丛用于栽植林木的带状区域） 沿等高线交替配置的生态技术在四川西部逐渐被推广应用,本文定量分析了该技术中保留带与造林带的水土和养分再分配效应．结果表明：①坡度和雨量级是影响保留带与造林带水土流失的重要因子,其越大则水土流失量越大．②保留带净存储水６１ ４６４ ～１２５ １７９ｔｋｍ －２ａ－１ ,拦截土壤２ １３６ ～２ ８１７ｔｋｍ －２ａ－１ ．③保留带表土层的养分比造林带的提高了１４．６８％ ～７４．８９％ ,造林带表土层的养分比对照提高了３ ．３１％ ～１１４．１６％ ．④保留带和造林带内从上至下的表土层养分有逐渐富积的趋势,且保留带与造林带相邻处的养分变化速率最大．⑤保留带通过地表径流的养分流动净积累了５７５ ．５９ ～１ ６９０ ．６６ ｋｇ ｋｍ －２ａ－１有效Ｎ;而对Ｐ、Ｋ 而言,保留带是否能通过地表径流来净积累养分则主要取决于坡度,坡度越大,越有利于保留带通过地表径流来净积累有效Ｐ、Ｋ．     

收益视角下我国产业环境压力与经济效益分析

在实现经济效益的同时,兼顾可持续发展已成为推进产业新常态发展的必然选择.本文首先采用多区域投入产出的戈什模型,从行业层面核算了我国各产业2009年的收益侧完全碳排放系数和感应力系数,然后根据2个系数的大小将34个产业部门划分为4大类.实证结果表明：第Ⅰ类行业对经济的推动能力较好,同时对环境产生的负面影响较大.第Ⅱ类行业需要促进行业内整合,提高行业的能源利用率.第Ⅲ类行业属于福利性产业,应当予以保护和支持.Ⅳ类行业具有较高的感应力系数和较低的完全收益侧碳排放系数,兼具行业友好和经济效益,满足当前供给侧结构性改革的内在要求,需要鼓励和发展.     

Indigenous Grass Ecology and Socio-Economic Values in Swaziland

The fast-degrading land resources of Swaziland requires a multi-faceted approach to their management. One resource of utmost importance to all Swazis is grass. Grass research over the years had focused on pasture grass, while other uses have been neglected. The omission is a serious one and could be attributed to the neglect of indigenous grass knowledge and people's socio-economic values of grasses. Grass as a major resource is used for cattle feed, ecological control measures, medicinal plants and crafts. Within the study area, 46 grass species were identified and described by the local people. The neglect of the people's knowledge and utilitarian values of grass is a waste of resources. Thus, for grass research to be relevant to the people and national development objectives, research scientists should rethink their approach; they need to recognize and incorporate the indigenous knowledge about other uses of grasses.