基于D-S证据理论的“丝绸之路旅游带”5A景区区位优势度测评

景区发展与其区位条件密切相关,处于优势区位的景区更容易获得优先快速发展。以“丝绸之路旅游带”为例,综合考虑资源、市场、交通及服务四大区位因子,将其视为证据,引入D-S证据理论对景区区位优势进行测度,以I~V级表征区位由优到劣的状态,最后对景区区位与旅游发展核心区进行对比。结果显示：（1）区位优势等级区域差异化显著,总体呈现由东南至西北逐级递减的空间分布规律,自I至V级,重心逐步向西北方向偏移。（2）各区位因子分布存在差异性,东南地区景区资源区位优于西北地区;市场区位地带间差异最为明显,存在“长尾”特征及陕西“一省独大”现象;交通区位内在差异性与区位优势相仿;服务区位已不再是制约景区区位的主要因子,但就单个省份来看,“核心—边缘”结构较为明显。（3）与景区旅游发展对比来看,二者具有明显的空间关联性,但仍存在一定程度的空间错位现象。     

跨省流域生态补偿机制的创新——基于区域治理的视角

在传统行政区行政理念的主导下,流域政府皆以追求本地利益最大化为基本目标,甚少关注甚至漠视流域公共利益,流域政府间利益冲突严重,因此,难以对跨省流域生态补偿达成一致意见.跨省流域生态补偿的实施有赖于政府行政管理理念向区域治理理念的转变和相应的机制创新,包括建立流域政府间的民主协商机制、多元主体联合供给机制和中央对流域政府的选择性激励机制.     

Diversity and organizational innovation: The role of employee involvement

This study examined the interactive effects of workplace diversity and employee involvement on organizational innovation. Using a sample of 182 large Canadian organizations, we found a three‐way interaction between level of employee involvement, variation in involvement, and racioethnic diversity on innovation. In organizations with high levels of employee involvement, high variation in involvement was associated with higher involvement levels among racioethnic minorities, resulting in a stronger association between diversity and innovation. Furthermore, the association between White employee involvement and innovation was significantly more positive under the condition of high involvement among racioethnic minority group members. Thus, ensuring high levels of involvement among members of historically marginalized racioethnic groups enhances the innovation effects of employee empowerment systems. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

How to foster agroecological innovations? A comparison of participatory design methods

Facing contemporary environmental crisis implies fostering agroecological innovations that take into account local ecological regulations and rely on multiple stakeholders' innovation capacities. This paper draws on two fields of literature that remain unconnected so far: participatory approaches and design sciences. It proposes an analysis grid to support a reflexive analysis of cases of implementation of three participatory design methods: ComMod (Companion Modelling for concerted management of natural resources), Forage Rummy (simulation-based board game for designing farming systems) and KCP (collective design workshops to foster innovation). This analysis highlights key features of the methods in view of agroecological innovation challenges, focusing on knowledge management and organisation for exploration.     

生态文明建设视角的当代中国旅游地理创新探索

推进生态文明、建设美丽中国,进而实现中华民族伟大复兴的中国梦,已成为中国共产党及其所领导的中国人民的最大追求和奋斗目标.一直为国民经济主战场服务的中国旅游地理,生态文明建设必然为其教材建设的主体内容之一.该文结合《中国旅游地理》(第四版)创新实际,仅就中国旅游地理推进生态文明建设教学内容体系构建及其构架进行了探索.参9.     

低碳环境下生产性服务企业创新研究

低碳经济时代的到来,为人类解决环保、解决生存问题提供有利保证。低碳技术的发展和投入使用不仅仅降低了企业的能耗量,使企业内部环境得到一定改善,工作效率得以提高,同时,企业在低碳环境下进行生产工作,也使自身形象得到了提升。但是针对低碳经济的需要,生产性服务企业面临的既是机遇,也是挑战。本文将结合低碳环境的主要特点以及生产性服务企业的发展现状,对生产性服务企业的创新问题做出研究与探讨,并根据实际情况提出相应的策略和建议。     

固体废物对城市生态环境的影响研究

针对在推进城市化中发挥生态环境优势的探讨,文中介绍了中国固体废物的现状,包括固体废弃物的定义及分类和固体废弃物的危害特性,探讨了新型城市废弃物的产生和发展趋势,探讨了在中国城市废弃物对大气和水体的污染,最后提出了中国新型城市化建设与保护生态环境的建议,要积极加快固体废弃物资源化处理、要积极加快气体、液体有害物收集及回用、要积极重视建筑节能与新能源开发利用和要积极利用城市废弃物,使城市生活废弃物得到有效利用。     

生态文明视域下技术创新、产业升级与污染控制的互作效应研究

随着工业化和城市化进程的加快,环境污染问题已成为生态文明建设亟需解决的重要问题.生态文明是对农业文明和工业文明的超越,代表了更为高级的人类文明形态.生态文明建设是体现经济、社会、环境可持续发展以及人与自然和谐共存的重要战略决策.本文从环境质量改善及污染控制的有效性方面,深入剖析了技术创新、产业升级与污染控制之间的互作效应关系,并探讨了有效的实现方式.研究结果旨在为生态文明建设的有效实施和顺利展开提供借鉴和参考价值.     

“城市矿产”示范基地——我国再生资源产业化的发展方向

以前三批29个国家＂城市矿产＂示范基地为研究对象,对示范基地的回收利用规模、重点项目覆盖范围、示范基地类型做了概括性梳理,总结了示范基地建设的成功经验,分析了妨碍示范基地健康发展的问题,并提出一些预测性意见,供行业同仁参考。     

Balance the Paradox between Limited Health Resources and Growing Demands for Medical Services

Health institutions in the People＇s Republic of China are under considerable challenge. Innovations in management systems may support the challenge to increase both efficiency and effectiveness. The balanced scorecard （BSC） is one such innovation. We have used a model to explore the factors that may impact the diffusion of the BSC in Chinese government hospitals. In particular, we concentrate on three factors - the outer context, the nature of the innovation and the communication and influence. The outer context and the nature of the innovation do provide an inducement to implement a BSC. The strength of the communication and influence may affect the level of take-up. However, we recognise that they may choose ＂the BSC not for any apparent technical excellence but for the legitimation that Western management practices may bring to local managers.