响应面法优化复合微生物吸附剂对低浓度Cr3+的吸附

根据已有4种微生物吸附剂的吸附基团存在的差异特征,将其复配成复合吸附剂,借助统计学方法研究其对低ρ(Cr3+)废水的吸附性能.在单因素试验基础上,利用P-B(Plackett-Burman)法筛选出吸附过程4个主要影响因素分别为pH,初始ρ(Cr3+)及微生物吸附剂XB和TQ的投加量,应用最陡爬坡试验接近主要因素最优水平,采用Box-Behnken试验设计和响应面分析得到对低浓度Cr3+吸附过程的二阶模型.结果表明,最优吸附条件为pH 4.0,初始ρ(Cr3+)为4.86mg/L,XB和TQ的投加量分别为0.20和0.13 g/L,实际吸附率达到87.54%,与理论预测值(87.68%)接近,且高出单一吸附剂吸附率7.79%～17.35%.FT-IR扫描显示,复合微生物吸附剂性能提高与表面基团增多有关.通过响应面分析法优化复合微生物吸附,吸附性能明显提高.     

中国开征碳税的政策后果预测

本文是对开征碳税的各种政策后果进行情景模拟的定量研究,既有短期的比较静态分析,又有长期的动态效应分析。在一定的假设条件下模拟分析了计征碳税对于GDP、投资、消费、外贸、物价等主要宏观经济指标的静态和动态影响,以及对居民收入和企业利润的效应。同时深入分析了计征碳税对石油、煤炭、天然气、电力等四类主要行业的碳排放、产量、进出口、价格、税负、成本、利润的影响效应。     

稀土磁盘水处理方案技术经济比较

文章针对日照钢铁集团公司2150热轧水处理工程浊环水处理方案选择,对传统沉淀过滤法和先进的稀土磁盘法进行了对比和分析,稀土磁盘法在效果、占地、投资和运行维护费用上有较多优势,最终选用该工艺。     

徐州市水资源承载力量化评价与研究

针对徐州市水资源系统构成、供需情况及存在问题,利用灰色关联度分析法与向量模法,构建了徐州市水资源承载力评价指标体系,并对其进行了量化评价.通过对量化评价结果的分析,找到了影响徐州市水资源承载力的主要因素,并提出了提高徐州市水资源承载力的对策与措施.     

主成分分析法在水环境质量评价中的应用进展

对研究水质的一种多元统计方法——主成分分析法做了详细介绍,并对主成分分析法在河流、地下水、矿区、湖泊水质评价中的应用进行了综述,简要分析了主成分分析法在水环境质量评价中尚有不足之处。     

响应面法优化厌氧上清液除磷的研究

在用铁盐对厌氧段富磷上清液进行化学磷沉淀以实现磷的回收和达标排放的SBR系统中,为了减少铁盐化学除磷残余物可能对生物处理系统的影响,采用Box-Benhnken中心组合试验原理和响应面分析法,选择Fe:P、混凝搅拌强度、絮凝搅拌强度、搅拌时间等为自变量,残余铁离子为响应值,研究自变量之间的交互作用,以期优化化学除磷条件.通过Design-Expert 8.0软件得到1个二次响应曲面模型.得出最佳除磷条件:Fe:P比为1.40:1,搅拌强度为275r/min,快速搅拌时间为30s,絮凝搅拌强度为60r/min,絮凝时间为18min,沉淀时间为20min.在此条件下,化学混凝后残余铁离子浓度为0.37mg/L,化学除磷率大于97.66%.     

Compositions and sources of organic acids in fine particles (PM2.5) over the Pearl River Delta region, south China

Organic acids as important constituents of organic aerosols not only influence the aerosols' hygroscopic property, but also enhance the formation of new particles and secondary organic aerosols. This study reported organic acids including C14–C32fatty acids, C4–C9dicarboxylic acids and aromatic acids in PM2.5collected during winter 2009 at six typical urban, suburban and rural sites in the Pearl River Delta region. Averaged concentrations of C14–C32fatty acids, aromatic acids and C4– C9 dicarboxylic acids were 157, 72.5 and 50.7 ng/m3, respectively. They totally accounted for 1.7% of measured organic carbon. C20–C32fatty acids mainly deriving from higher plant wax showed the highest concentration at the upwind rural site with more vegetation around, while C14–C18fatty acids were more abundant at urban and suburban sites, and dicarboxylic acids and aromatic acids except 1,4-phthalic acid peaked at the downwind rural site. Succinic and azelaic acid were the most abundant among C4–C9dicarboxylic acids, and 1,2-phthalic and 1,4-phthalic acid were dominant aromatic acids. Dicarboxylic acids and aromatic acids exhibited significant mutual correlations except for 1,4-phthalic acid, which was probably primarily emitted from combustion of solid wastes containing polyethylene terephthalate plastics. Spatial patterns and correlations with typical source tracers suggested that C14–C32fatty acids were mainly primary while dicarboxylic and aromatic acids were largely secondary. Principal component analysis resolved six sources including biomass burning, natural higher plant wax, two mixed anthropogenic and two secondary sources; further multiple linear regression revealed their contributions to individual organic acids. It turned out that more than 70% of C14–C18fatty acids were attributed to anthropogenic sources, about 50%–85% of the C20–C32fatty acids were attributed to natural sources, 80%–95% of dicarboxylic acids and 1,2-phthalic acid were secondary in contrast with that 81% of 1,4-phthalic acid was primary.     

污染影响了健康,证据呢？

@大林崔：风险管理,重点是特征污染物。当前环境与健康风险不断加大,环保问题很容易发展为社会问题甚至政治问题,必须通过风险管理,从特征污染物的产生、排放、暴露控制等方面降低其致害风险。@文迪姐姐：制定环境与健康基准,只要有10年以上的数据积累,就完全可以实现。这甚至可以成为地方执政者的绩效考核标准。@绿色水滴2013：近年来,我国突发环境事件持续上升,环境风险比较突出,迫切需要开展环境基准和风险评估研究。@污染的健康很寂静：健康风险管理,核心是风险管理,重点是健康风险评估,要不然又是白忙活。     

印染前处理节能减排评价模型的建立及应用

针对目前印染前处理工艺,依据评价指标的原则,采用层次分析法从资源指标、环境指标、生产指标及经济指标4个方面建立了印染前处理工艺节能减排综合评价指标体系;提出了基于AHP-Fuzzy方法上的前处理工艺节能减排效果综合评价模型。最后,将该模型应用到印染前处理新工艺中,根据对新工艺相关节能减排指标的监测、核算以及调查,依照隶属函数值计算方法,得到其模糊评价矩阵及其向量,其结果表明,新工艺的节能减排综合评价等级为"优",节能减排效果很好。     

GC和HPLC测定环境水体中苦味酸的分析方法比较

文章分别建立了气相色谱法电子捕获检测器(GC-ECD)和高效液相色谱法紫外检测器(HPLC-UVD)测定地表水中苦味酸的分析方法,并比较了2种方法在实际应用过程中的优缺点。GC-ECD测定方法是将苦味酸经次氯酸钠氯化衍生,再用正己烷振荡萃取后进行气相色谱分析。通过对萃取溶剂和次氯酸钠加入量等萃取条件优化,苦味酸方法检出限为0.000 5 mg/L,线性范围为0.002~0.08mg/L,加标回收率为74.2%~103%,相对标准偏差为1.9%~3.4%。HPLC-UVD测定方法是水样经0.22μm滤膜过滤后直接进样,由紫外检测器进行分析,无需萃取浓缩。通过液相色谱条件优化,苦味酸方法检出限为0.03 mg/L,线性范围为0.1~2.0 mg/L,加标回收率为85.4%~105%,相对标准偏差为4.3%~7.3%。2种方法均能满足地表水水质监测要求,其中GC-ECD方法灵敏度和准确度都较高,适合痕量样品的检测,而HPLC方法快速简便,适合大通量的筛查分析。