排序方式: 共有2条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
P. A. M. Dirac 《Die Naturwissenschaften》1973,60(12):529-531
There are reasons for believing that the gravitational constant, expressed in terms of atomic units, is not accurately constant, but varies slowly with the age of the universe. This requires a modification of Einstein's theory of gravitation. One may suppose that the element of distance occurring in Einstein's theory is not the same as that measured by atomic apparatus. It becomes possible to revive Weyl's geometry, a generalization of that used by Einstein, to account for the electromagnetic field. There is then no exact symmetry between positive and negative electric charge, or between past and future. 相似文献
2.
Dirac Twidwell Carissa L. Wonkka Christine H. Bielski Craig R. Allen David G. Angeler Jacob Drozda Ahjond S. Garmestani Julia Johnson Larkin A. Powell Caleb P. Roberts 《Conservation biology》2018,32(4):905-915
A modern challenge for conservation biology is to assess the consequences of policies that adhere to assumptions of stationarity (e.g., historic norms) in an era of global environmental change. Such policies may result in unexpected and surprising levels of mitigation given future climate‐change trajectories, especially as agriculture looks to protected areas to buffer against production losses during periods of environmental extremes. We assessed the potential impact of climate‐change scenarios on the rates at which grasslands enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) are authorized for emergency harvesting (i.e., biomass removal) for agricultural use, which can occur when precipitation for the previous 4 months is below 40% of the normal or historical mean precipitation for that 4‐month period. We developed and analyzed scenarios under the condition that policy will continue to operate under assumptions of stationarity, thereby authorizing emergency biomass harvesting solely as a function of precipitation departure from historic norms. Model projections showed the historical likelihood of authorizing emergency biomass harvesting in any given year in the northern Great Plains was 33.28% based on long‐term weather records. Emergency biomass harvesting became the norm (>50% of years) in the scenario that reflected continued increases in emissions and a decrease in growing‐season precipitation, and areas in the Great Plains with higher historical mean annual rainfall were disproportionately affected and were subject to a greater increase in emergency biomass removal. Emergency biomass harvesting decreased only in the scenario with rapid reductions in emissions. Our scenario‐impact analysis indicated that biomass from lands enrolled in the CRP would be used primarily as a buffer for agriculture in an era of climatic change unless policy guidelines are adapted or climate‐change projections significantly depart from the current consensus. 相似文献
1