Effects of aggregation on feeding and survival in a communal wren

Summary Foraging by a social wren, Campylorhynchus nuchalis (Troglodytidae), in a tropical savanna habitat is not enhanced by aggregation. Data for marked individuals show that solitary foraging results in a higher capture rate than foraging near others. We find no evidence of imitative foraging, as individuals actively avoid successful foragers following a capture and successful foragers do not restrict their search to recently productive stations or techniques. Captures are seldom temporally clumped, and clumping is probably not pronounced enough to favor imitation. Juveniles show no greater tendency to respond to captures of others, or to succeed in foraging in a group, than do adults. Aggregation is probably disadvantageous for foraging because of dispersed, scarce, cryptic, and noneruptive prey and because of the searching technique of these foliage-gleaning insectivores. If predator avoidance is enhanced by aggregation, it does not result in either increased survival or increased foraging efficiency in large groups, even by juveniles.     

Reproductive enhancement by helpers and an experimental inquiry into its mechanism in the bicolored wren

Summary As part of continuing studies of sociality in the wren genus Campylorhynchus we have been studying the bicolored wren — a facultatively cooperative breeder — for the past 6 years in the central Venezuelan savanna. Reproductive groups have ranged in size from 2 to 5. In one of our study populations, only about 15% of the groups contained helpers, and nearly all these contained only a single male helper (Fig. 2). In an adjacent population, the majority of groups contained helpers, and more than half of these contained several helpers of either sex. Territory size is, on average, much smaller in the latter population. In these populations the presence of a single helper is associated with a three-fold increase in reproductive success (Table 1). Additional helpers are not associated with further reproductive enhancement. Enhancement is chiefly due to an increased proportion of nest starts that eventually produce independent juveniles. This reproductive enhancement is not merely an epiphenomenon resulting from the presence of helpers on territories which are superior for other reasons, such as greater resource availability or the quality of particular parents. It is also not a function of the mean or variance in nestling feeding rate. Predator exclusion experiments, in which certan nests were artificially protected from terrestrial predators, suggested that the mechanism of reproductive enhancement was heightened effectiveness of nest defense. Helpers are usually nondispersers from the parental territory, and have always been found to be close relative of the nestlings that they assist in rearing.     

Cooperation in breeding by nonreproductive wrens: kinship,reciprocity, and demography

Summary Stripe-backed wrens (Campylorhynchus nuchalis) often live as adults in large groups on permanent, communally defended territories. Nonbreeding adults cooperate in rearing the young of a single breeding pair; this aid substantially increases the reproductive success of the breeders. In a 6-year study in Venezuela of a completely colorbanded population of 25–30 groups, most adults participated in breeding only as helpers and priority to breeding status was strictly age-determined. Detailed behavioral observations at breeding nests with nestlings showed that, in a sample of 100, helpers nearly always contributed as much to the care of young as breeders. Further, aid-giving does not vary systematically with relatedness of ycung to helpers or with probability of future reciprocation by young. Young being raised are most often at least half siblings of helpers, but seldom return aid to adults that helped raise them. Even adopted helpers collaborate fully. Patterns of demography and dispersal show slow turnover of breeders, delayed reproduction, and a viscous population structure.Application of Hamilton's condition for selection for aid-giving reveals that most individuals in this population can maximize inclusive fitness in the first 2 years by helping instead of breeding. Variation in helping effort and in age of first breeding is related to variation in natal group size and competition resulting from variable demographic neighborhoods in different years or in different parts of the population. Because reciprocation in the form of specific alliance formation among nonreproductives is uncommon, nonspecific reciprocity between cohorts and kin selection account well for the observed pattern of age-dependence in first breeding. Nondiscriminating helping in this population is associated with stable monogamous pair boncs, stable territory boundaries and group membership, strict seniortiy for breeding position, high viscosity and consistent effectiveness of aid. Under these circumstances, very simple behavioral rules amounting to nearly automatic helping seem sufficient to confer critical inclusive fitness gain on helpers.     

Extra-pair paternity uncommon in the cooperatively breeding bicolored wren

We investigated parentage using multilocus DNA fingerprinting for 222 juveniles produced during 99 group-years in the bicolored wren Campylorhynchus griseus, a cooperatively breeding bird of the Venezuelan savanna. Young adult bicolored wrens (auxiliaries) remain in their natal territories and substantially enhance the production of young there. We have previously used behavioral indicators of dominance by a single male/female pair (principals) to infer breeding status, resulting in the commonly applied model of helping in which current fitness accrues to auxiliaries only indirectly, in proportion to their relatedness to the principals and the effect of their assistance on breeding success. Our parentage analysis has demonstrated that 8.6% of the juveniles found on territories were not produced by the principal pair. Parentage of 4.1% of the juveniles was completely outside the social group; these appear to result from early dispersal of juveniles rather than from brood parasitism, most likely resulting from breakup of nearby groups. Principal females mated outside of their group (2.3%), or with an auxiliary male (2.3%), in the remaining cases of parentage outside the principal pair. No matings were detected between close relatives (e.g. mother-son); matings detected between the principal female and an auxiliary male followed a typical replacement of the principal female by an unrelated immigrant female. Our finger-printing results indicate that: (1) current fitness benefits accruing to most auxiliaries do not exceed their likely reproductive success had they dispersed successfully to a breeding position; (2) nearly all wren mating is monogamous and (3) behavioral dominants (especially females) can monopolize breeding. Received: 23 September 1994/Accepted after revision: 10 June 1995