Optimisation of the co-combustion of meat–bone meal and sewage sludge in terms of the quality produced ashes used as substitute of phosphorites

Environmental Science and Pollution Research - To obtain a high-quality phosphorus raw material comparable in quality to the best phosphorites used in the fertiliser industry, an analysis was...     

The ability of Azolla caroliniana to remove heavy metals (Hg(II), Cr(III), Cr(VI)) from municipal waste water

The aim of this paper was to investigate the capacity of a small water fern, Azolla caroliniana Willd. (Azollaceae), to purify waters polluted by Hg and Cr. Many plants are capable of accumulating heavy metals (called hyperaccumulators) and one of them is the water fern A. caroliniana. During 12 days of the experiment the fern was grown on the nutrient solution containing Hg2+, Cr3+ and CrO4(2-) ions, each in a concentration 0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 mg dm(-3). The presence of these ions caused a 20-31% inhibition of A. caroliniana growth, the highest in the presence of Hg(II) ions, in comparison to the control. After day 12 of the experiment, metal contents the solution decreased to 0-0.25 mg dm(-3), and this decrease comprised between 74 (Cr3+ 1.0 mg dm(-3) treatment) and 100% (CrO4(2-) 0.1 mg dm(-3) treatment). The fern took a lesser quantity of the metals from 0.1 mg dm(-3) treatments compared to 0.5 and 1.0 mg dm(-3) treatments. In the A. caroliniana tissues the concentration of heavy metals under investigation ranged from 71 to 964 mg kg(-1) dm; the highest level being found for Cr(III) containing nutrient solution.     

Assessment of waste management technology using BATNEEC options, technology quality method and multi-criteria analysis

Best Available Techniques Not Entailing Excessive Costs (BATNEEC) options, technology quality method and multi-criteria analysis were proposed as means of developing indices for evaluating municipal waste management systems. The proposed indices can be treated as a tool for ranking the system taking into account technical, environmental, economic, social and other objectives, bearing in mind specific features of the area involved. The analysis was made for three different incineration plants (Spittelau in Vienna, Warsaw and Tarnobrzeg) together with alternative waste disposal versions (with or without biogas burning and with MBP Mechanical-Biological Process) and the waste management infrastructure. The results showed that incineration of waste is much more beneficial than disposal. These results conform to the waste hierarchy identified in EU Directive 2008/98, but the indices created are easy to interpret and useful as a tool for communicating with the public, which is often a crucial factor in determining the location of investment.