排序方式: 共有5条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
Chencho Norbu Prof. Timothy J. Downs Edward Yeboah Dr. L.J.R. Scholtens Dr. Jyotsna Bapat Maren Oelbermann Ph.D. Sayyed Ahang Kowsar Jaime Alexandra Webbe Bram Govaerts Ph.D. Nele Verhulst M. Sc. Goodspeed Kopolo Maria Rosário Partidário Mr. N’guessan Alphonse Kouassi John All Ph.D. JD Narcisa Pricope Leslie Lipper 《Natural resources forum》2008,32(3):252-256
2.
3.
4.
De-Gao Wang Helena SteerTara Tait Zackery WilliamsGrazina Pacepavicius Teresa YoungTimothy Ng Shirley Anne SmythLaura Kinsman Mehran Alaee 《Chemosphere》2013
A comprehensive surveillance program was conducted to determine the occurrence of three cyclic volatile methylsiloxanes (cVMS) octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4), decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5), and dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane (D6) in environmental compartments impacted by wastewater effluent discharges. Eleven wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), representative of those found in Southern Ontario and Southern Quebec, Canada, were investigated to determine levels of cVMS in their influents and effluents. In addition, receiving water and sediment impacted by WWTP effluents, and biosolid-amended soil from agricultural fields were also analyzed for a preliminary evaluation of the environmental exposure of cVMS in media impacted by wastewater effluent and solids. A newly-developed large volume injection (septumless head adapter and cooled injection system) gas chromatography – mass spectrometry method was used to avoid contamination originating from instrumental analysis. Concentrations of D4, D5, and D6 in influents to the 11 WWTPs were in the range 0.282–6.69 μg L−1, 7.75–135 μg L−1, and 1.53–26.9 μg L−1, respectively. In general, wastewater treatment showed cVMS removal rates of greater than 92%, regardless of treatment type. The D4, D5, and D6 concentration ranges in effluent were <0.009–0.045 μg L−1, <0.027–1.56 μg L−1, and <0.022–0.093 μg L−1, respectively. The concentrations in receiving water influenced by effluent, were lower compared to those in effluent in most cases, with the ranges <0.009–0.023 μg L−1, <0.027–1.48 μg L−1, and <0.022–0.151 μg L−1 for D4, D5, and D6, respectively. Sediment concentrations ranged from <0.003–0.049 μg g−1 dw, 0.011–5.84 μg g−1 dw, and 0.004–0.371 μg g−1 dw for D4, D5, and D6, respectively. The concentrations in biosolid-amended soil, having values of <0.008–0.017 μg g−1 dw, <0.007–0.221 μg g−1 dw, and <0.009–0.711 μg g−1 dw for D4, D5, and D6, respectively, were lower than those in sediment impacted by wastewater effluent in most cases. In comparison with the no-observed-effected concentrations (NOEC) and IC50 (concentration that causes 50% inhibition of the response) values, the potential risks to aquatic, sediment-dwelling, and terrestrial organisms from these reported concentrations are low. 相似文献
5.
Kinsman JD Saunders WP Wyzga RE 《Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)》1988,53(1-4):285-302
In this study, alternative dose-response equations for assessing the effects of O3 on soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) were established. For each of three soybean cultivars, three models (linear, quadratic, and Weibull) were fitted to relate different measures of O3 dose, during the soybean flowering maturity period, to the soybean yield. The dose measures were 7-h (9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.) and 12-h (7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.) means, 7-h and 12-h total doses, and the 90th and 75th percentile O3 concentrations. Using data for primarily rural and small city O3 monitoring sites, county-level O3 doses were calculated, and soybean losses due to O3 were predicted for Illinois, Kentucky, and Virginia. The sensitivity of O3-induced soybean loss predictions to model forms and inputs was determined with regard to: (1) inter-year differences in ambient O3, (2) differences among the six dose measures, (3) differences among the three different model forms, (4) the impact of the agricultural practice of double-cropped soybean production, and (5) variance in response to O3 among three different soybean cultivars. 相似文献
1