Mercury Mass Balances: A Case Study of Two North Dakota Power Plants

ABSTRACT

The Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC) conducted a mercury-sampling program to provide data on the quantity and forms of Hg emitted and on the Hg removal efficiency of the existing air pollution control devices at two North Dakota power plants—Milton R. Young Station and Coal Creek Station. Minnkota Power Cooperative, Great River Energy, the North Dakota Industrial Commission, and EPRI funded the project. The primary objective was to obtain accurate measurements of Hg released from each plant, as verified by a material balance. A secondary objective was to evaluate the ability of a mercury continuous emission monitor (CEM) to measure total Hg at the stack.

At both plants, speciated Hg measurements were made at the inlets and outlets of both the electrostatic precipi-tators (ESPs) and the flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems. A Semtech Hg 2000 (Semtech Metallurgy AB) mercury CEM was used to measure the total Hg emissions at the stack in real time. Using these measurements and plant data, the measured Hg concentrations in the coal, FGD slurries, and ESP ash, a Hg mass flow rate was calculated at each sampling location. Excellent Hg mass balances were obtained (±15%). It was also found that the Hg was mostly in the elemental phase (~90%), and the small amount of oxidized Hg that was generated was removed by the FGD systems.

Insignificant amounts of particulate-bound Hg were measured at both plants. However, 10-20% of the elemental Hg measured prior to the ESP was converted to oxidized Hg across the ESP. The data show that, at these facilities, almost all of the Hg generated is being emitted into the atmosphere as elemental Hg. Local or regional deposition of the Hg emitted from these plants is not a concern. However, the Hg does become part of the global Hg burden in the atmosphere. Also, the evidence appears to indicate that elemental Hg is more difficult to remove from flue gas than oxidized Hg is.     

Advancing the Integration of History and Ecology for Conservation

Abstract: The important role of humans in the development of current ecosystems was recognized decades ago; however, the integration of history and ecology in order to inform conservation has been difficult. We identified four issues that hinder historical ecological research and considered possible solutions. First, differences in concepts and methods between the fields of ecology and history are thought to be large. However, most differences stem from miscommunication between ecologists and historians and are less substantial than is usually assumed. Cooperation can be achieved by focusing on the features ecology and history have in common and through understanding and acceptance of differing points of view. Second, historical ecological research is often hampered by differences in spatial and temporal scales between ecology and history. We argue that historical ecological research can only be conducted at extents for which sources in both disciplines have comparable resolutions. Researchers must begin by clearly defining the relevant scales for the given purpose. Third, periods for which quantitative historical sources are not easily accessible (before AD 1800) have been neglected in historical ecological research. Because data from periods before 1800 are as relevant to the current state of ecosystems as more recent data, we suggest that historical ecologists actively seek out data from before 1800 and apply analytic methods commonly used in ecology to these data. Fourth, humans are not usually considered an intrinsic ecological factor in current ecological research. In our view, human societies should be acknowledged as integral parts of ecosystems and societal processes should be recognized as driving forces of ecosystem change.     

Mercury mass balances: a case study of two North Dakota power plants

The Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC) conducted a mercury-sampling program to provide data on the quantity and forms of Hg emitted and on the Hg removal efficiency of the existing air pollution control devices at two North Dakota power plants--Milton R. Young Station and Coal Creek Station. Minnkota Power Cooperative, Great River Energy, the North Dakota Industrial Commission, and EPRI funded the project. The primary objective was to obtain accurate measurements of Hg released from each plant, as verified by a material balance. A secondary objective was to evaluate the ability of a mercury continuous emission monitor (CEM) to measure total Hg at the stack. At both plants, speciated Hg measurements were made at the inlets and outlets of both the electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) and the flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems. A Semtech Hg 2000 (Semtech Metallurgy AB) mercury CEM was used to measure the total Hg emissions at the stack in real time. Using these measurements and plant data, the measured Hg concentrations in the coal, FGD slurries, and ESP ash, a Hg mass flow rate was calculated at each sampling location. Excellent Hg mass balances were obtained (+/- 15%). It was also found that the Hg was mostly in the elemental phase (approximately 90%), and the small amount of oxidized Hg that was generated was removed by the FGD systems. Insignificant amounts of particulate-bound Hg were measured at both plants. However, 10-20% of the elemental Hg measured prior to the ESP was converted to oxidized Hg across the ESP. The data show that, at these facilities, almost all of the Hg generated is being emitted into the atmosphere as elemental Hg. Local or regional deposition of the Hg emitted from these plants is not a concern. However, the Hg does become part of the global Hg burden in the atmosphere. Also, the evidence appears to indicate that elemental Hg is more difficult to remove from flue gas than oxidized Hg is.