Mapping ground water vulnerability to pesticide leaching with a process-based metamodel of EuroPEARL

To support EU policy, indicators of pesticide leaching at the European level are required. For this reason, a metamodel of the spatially distributed European pesticide leaching model EuroPEARL was developed. EuroPEARL considers transient flow and solute transport and assumes Freundlich adsorption, first-order degradation and passive plant uptake of pesticides. Physical parameters are depth dependent while (bio)-chemical parameters are depth, temperature, and moisture dependent. The metamodel is based on an analytical expression that describes the mass fraction of pesticide leached. The metamodel ignores vertical parameter variations and assumes steady flow. The calibration dataset was generated with EuroPEARL and consisted of approximately 60,000 simulations done for 56 pesticides with different half-lives and partitioning coefficients. The target variable was the 80th percentile of the annual average leaching concentration at 1-m depth from a time series of 20 yr. The metamodel explains over 90% of the variation of the original model with only four independent spatial attributes. These parameters are available in European soil and climate databases, so that the calibrated metamodel could be applied to generate maps of the predicted leaching concentration in the European Union. Maps generated with the metamodel showed a good similarity with the maps obtained with EuroPEARL, which was confirmed by means of quantitative performance indicators.     

Estimating travel time of recharge water through a deep vadose zone using a transfer function model

We estimate the travel time of percolating water through a deep vadose zone at the regional scale using a transfer function model and a physical based conceptual flow model (Hydrus-1D), thereby exploiting the time series of precipitation, actual evapotranspiration and groundwater piezometry and generic vadose zone data. With the transfer function model we observe a high variability of estimated travel time varying from 0.9 to 3.1 years, corresponding to estimated vertical water flux velocities varying from 6.6 to 28.0 m/year. These results were compared with the travel time estimated from the physical based conceptual model. With the flow model, estimated travel time varies between 4.7 and 15.5 years, corresponding to water flux velocities varying between 1.7 and 4.1 m/year. The estimated travel time calculated with the flow model were therefore about five times larger than those estimated with the transfer function model. This could be explained by the fact that the transfer function model considers heterogeneous recharge from the vadose zone as well as from the vicinity of the piezometer through the so called “pushing effect”. In addition, the flow model requires various hydrogeological and hydrodynamic parameters which were estimated using generic parametrisation approaches, that are largely affected by uncertainty and may not reflect the local conditions. In contrast, the transfer function model only exploits available measurable time series and has the advantage of being site-specific.     

SAFE—A hierarchical framework for assessing the sustainability of agricultural systems

Sustainable development and the definition of indicators to assess progress towards sustainability have become a high priority in scientific research and on policy agendas. In this paper, we propose a consistent and comprehensive framework of principles, criteria and indicators (PC&I) for sustainability assessment of agricultural systems, referred to as the Sustainability Assessment of Farming and the Environment (SAFE) framework. In addition we formulate consistent and objective approaches for indicator identification and selection. The framework is designed for three spatial levels: the parcel level, the farm level and a higher spatial level that can be the landscape, the region or the state. The SAFE framework is hierarchical as it is composed of principles, criteria, indicators and reference values in a structured way. Principles are related to the multiple functions of the agro-ecosystem, which go clearly beyond the production function alone. The multifunctional character of the agro-ecosystem encompasses the three pillars of sustainability: the environmental, economic and social pillars. Indicators and reference values are the end-products of the framework. They are the operational tools that are used for evaluating the sustainability of the agro-ecosystems. The proposed analytical framework is not intended to find a common solution for sustainability in agriculture as a whole, but to serve as an assessment tool for the identification, the development and the evaluation of agricultural production systems, techniques and policies.