The Surface Roughness of a Rubber Soling Material Determines the Coefficient of Friction on Water-Lubricated Surfaces

For more than a decade, evidence has been accumulating that points to the fact that the microscopic roughness of the footwear soling surface is a major determinant of slip-resistance on lubricated surfaces, but conclusive experimental proof has been lacking. This article describes an experiment in which five pairs of shoes were soled with the same rubber compound. Four of the pairs were abraded by different grades of grit to produce a range of roughness values. The coefficient of friction (CoF) of the five solings was then measured repeatedly by the walking traction method on wet surfaces including glazed wall tiles, vinyl asbestos coated with the wax floor polish, and both sides of a sheet of float glass. The Kruskal-Wallis statistical test proved beyond doubt that the soling roughness is a major factor in determining the CoF of this rubber soling material; p < 10⁻⁵. Nearly all of the grip was due to surface roughness of the soling material on these atypically smooth floors, although the surface roughness of the floors also had a significant effect on CoF; p < 0.003. Float glass is shown to be a promising reference floor material for the measurement of CoF of footwear; there was no statistical difference between results for the two sides of the glass sheet. Float glass could be used in the development of a standard CoF test method because new sheets of glass from the same manufacturer are identical and extremely smooth. The specification of CoF values for solings/floors combinations in lubricated conditions is of little value unless associated with roughness measurements and knowledge of how wear will affect the surface roughness of the sole. This article reports the first evidence that any specification of flooring by measuring CoF based on dry surfaces could lead to an increase in the number of injuries caused by slipping on the wet surfaces. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd     

Safer alternatives assessment: the Massachusetts process as a model for state governments

In 2006 the Massachusetts Toxics Use Reduction Institute conducted a study to determine if states could identify safer alternatives to five chemicals of concern. The chemicals investigated included di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), formaldehyde, hexavalent chromium, lead and perchloroethylene. First, the Institute developed a methodology for assessing alternatives to these five chemicals that allowed it to quickly determine priority uses and alternatives to assess and to research the pertinent decision criteria, which included performance, technical, financial environmental and human health parameters. The methodology included important feedback from stakeholders in the state, which helped to focus and enhance the value of the work. Second, the Institute implemented the methodology over a ten month period. Based on the activities conducted by the Institute, safer alternatives were identified for each of the priority uses associated with the five chemicals studied. This report summarizes the methodology employed and provides examples of the results for one of the five chemicals, namely DEHP. The experience of the Institute and the information contained in this report indicates that alternatives assessment was a useful approach to organizing and evaluating information about chemicals and alternatives.     

Determination of Microorganisms’ Attack on Some Flexible Polymers by Using Soil Burial Test Method

Many controversial issues have recently been associated with plasticized poly(vinyl chloride) (pPVC) used in building applications, mainly for flooring. One of them has to do with the health impact of some plasticizers and thermal stabilizers based on heavy metal compounds. Recent advances in the synthesis of polyolefins based on metallocene catalysts can yield similar flexibility for formulations as is now available for those based on pPVC. Polyolefin copolymers are considered to be possible replacements for pPVC. The soil burial test has demonstrated that highly filled polyolefin elastomer formulations having a significant percentage of post-consumer polyolefins (up to 60% in laboratory conditions) have interesting properties from the biodegradation point of view. They are more resistant to microorganisms’ attack than plasticized flooring formulations based on PVC that are currently used, even in a very harsh environment as soil, where complex mixtures of microorganisms are present. The effect of microorganisms’ attack after soil burial was evaluated by visual examination, weight loss, water absorption and changes in mechanical properties.     

Contribution to the Study of Fungal Attack on Some Plasticized Vinyl Formulations

The objective of this study was to develop new vinyl flooring formulations with increased resistance to fungi and microorganisms attack, by using plasticizers having a chemical composition different from that of common di-ethylhexyl phthalate (DOP). It is suspected that during the vinyl flooring life service, the attack of fungi and microorganisms leads to the degradation of DOP and the release of some volatile organic compounds (VOC). For this reason the new materials were formulated with plasticizers having chemical composition different of that of DOP i.e.: diethyleneglycol dibenzoate (2–45), tricresyl phosphate (Lindol) and phenol alkylsulphonic ester (Mesamoll). For the same reason in the new flooring formulations the vinyl polymer, vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate copolymer (VC-VAc), was partially replaced with lignin (L) a natural polymer and major component of wood and vascular plants. Besides its other functions in wood, L imparts resistance to the most microorganisms attack. An organosolv lignin Alcell lignin (AL) was utilized as partial replacement of VC-VAc copolymer.The influence of the new plasticizers, as well as the influence of the partial replacement of VC-VAc copolymer with L on the resistance of the new formulations to fungal attack was evaluated following a standard procedure given in ASTM G 21–2002 “Determining Resistance of Synthetic Polymeric Materials to Fungi”. The evaluation has been undertaken for controls (formulated without AL) and blends (formulated with 20 parts AL) specimens. Test specimens were inoculated with a mixture of five fungi. Following 28 days of incubation at 28°C and 95% relative humidity, the specimens were examinated visual and under the microscope and rated for fungal growth. Weight loss, changes in mechanical properties and changes in glass transition temperature due to the effect of biodeterioration were also determined.Although each plasticizer has a specific resistance to hydrolysis due to differences among ester groups, the visible effects of fungal attack, in formulations without AL, is similar for all plasticized controls, with the exception of formulations incorporating diethyleneglycol dibenzoate (2–45) in which a higher degree of biodegradation was always present. Based on the weight loss of specimens formulated without AL, their resistance to fungal attack can be rated as follows: . The same rating is applicable for blend specimens. The results have demonstrated that each particular AL-plasticizer-additives formulation has its specific mechanism of biodegradation.