排序方式: 共有3条查询结果,搜索用时 62 毫秒
1
1.
It is not uncommon for the carrying capacity for congestible facilities to be estimated before the allocation method is known. This paper shows how efficient capacity differs between two competing resource allocation mechanisms, one which is efficient (price) and one which is fair (lottery). The welfare theoretic implications of adopting lottery allocation rather than price allocation are illustrated from the perspectives of economic efficiency and the benefits obtained by resource users and suppliers. It is found that risk-neutral resource users will always prefer lottery allocation to price allocation. While price allocation is efficient, it is never in risk-neutral resource users» interests to have price allocation imposed. Conclusions are tested using a linear constant crowding demand function, in which case it is found that the efficient capacity for lottery rationing exceeds the efficient capacity where price is to be used to allocate a congestible resource. Objectives may be better met by joint use of allocation mechanisms, the implications of which are investigated using the linear demand model. 相似文献
2.
3.
生态环境补偿机制的探索 总被引:6,自引:0,他引:6
文章提出生态环境补偿机制问题 ,并对三种生态补偿机制进行研究。目的在于促进源头区、重点山区、水源涵养区的生态良性循环发展 ,全面改善我国的生态环境状况。 相似文献
1