生态福利绩效视角下的上海市可持续发展评价研究

资源与环境约束加剧的大背景下,在"生态门槛"内实现社会福利最大化的可持续发展模式是未来城市发展的必然选择。从生态福利绩效视角出发,选取人均生态足迹和人类发展指数构建城市可持续发展评价指标体系,并采用DEA方法计算二者的投入产出效率,对上海市1999~2012年可持续发展水平进行多维度、动态化的实证分析。研究发现:1上海市人类发展指数、人均生态足迹与经济发展同步增长,但人均生态足迹水平大于生态承载能力,处于严重"生态赤字"状态,并不断恶化;2上海市多数年份的生态福利绩效处于DEA无效状态,且2005年以来进入规模收益递减通道。最后提出政策建议。     

人类发展指数的修正与可持续发展的替代指标

本文确认了全球社会-生态问题(过度消费,道德危机)的主要根源并提出了新的可持续发展的愿景,重点要关注精神、道德、心理、生理和人的智力开发(而代替以消费为导主的理念)。讨论了人类发展指标不足所涉及到的因素(寿命预期、人均国内生产总值),提出了测量人类可持续发展的替代指标,即:健康人口的比例。生态效率也被建议作为转化可持续发展的必要条件,人的精神,根据生态中心立场(社会-生态幸福)。通过适当的教育和体制政策而实现环境和人类健康、公平和整个人类的发展。     

Patterns of Citations of Open Access and Non‐Open Access Conservation Biology Journal Papers and Book Chapters

Abstract: Open access (OA) publishing, whereby authors, their institutions, or their granting bodies pay or provide a repository through which peer‐reviewed work is available online for free, is championed as a model to increase the number of citations per paper and disseminate results widely, especially to researchers in developing countries. We compared the number of citations of OA and non‐OA papers in six journals and four books published since 2000 to test whether OA increases number of citations overall and increases citations made by authors in developing countries. After controlling for type of paper (e.g., review or research paper), length of paper, authors’ citation profiles, number of authors per paper, and whether the author or the publisher released the paper in OA, OA had no statistically significant influence on the overall number of citations per journal paper. Journal papers were cited more frequently if the authors had published highly cited papers previously, were members of large teams of authors, or published relatively long papers, but papers were not cited more frequently if they were published in an OA source. Nevertheless, author‐archived OA book chapters accrued up to eight times more citations than chapters in the same book that were not available through OA, perhaps because there is no online abstracting service for book chapters. There was also little evidence that journal papers or book chapters published in OA received more citations from authors in developing countries relative to those journal papers or book chapters not published in OA. For scholarly publications in conservation biology, only book chapters had an OA citation advantage, and OA did not increase the number of citations papers or chapters received from authors in developing countries.     

资源可持续利用评价——基于资源福利指数的实证分析

资源可持续利用是可持续发展的核心和重要组成部分,论文将资源可持续利用置于 "自然-经济-社会" 三位一体的复杂系统中进行研究,以资源的综合利用效率为视角,结合人类发展指数(HDI)和生态足迹指数(EFI),提出资源福利指数(RWI),即单位资源投入所产出的福利水平,目的是全面反映在利用资源发展经济的同时反馈给社会的综合效率水平。论文以包括G20 国在内的24 个国家作为研究样本,分析1996-2008 年间各国的HDI、EFI 和RWI的变化情况,以此为依据来评价资源的可持续利用状况,24 个国家资源的可持续利用大致分为三类。第一类,良性发展:RWI增长率>0,社会福利提高,资源消耗减少;第二类,次良性正向发展:RWI增长率>0,社会福利水平和资源消耗都增长,但前者增长的速度高于后者;第三类,次恶性正向发展:RWI增长率<0,社会福利水平和资源消耗都增加,但前者增长的速度低于后者。     

人类发展指数的修正与可持续发展的替代指标

本文确认了全球社会-生态问题（过度消费,道德危机）的主要根源并提出了新的可持续发展的愿景,重点要关注精神、道德、心理、生理和人的智力开发（而代替以消费为导主的理念）。讨论了人类发展指标不足所涉及到的因素（寿命预期、人均国内生产总值）,提出了测量人类可持续发展的替代指标,即：健康人口的比例。生态效率也被建议作为转化可持续发展的必要条件,人的精神,根据生态中心立场（社会-生态幸福）。通过适当的教育和体制政策而实现环境和人类健康、公平和整个人类的发展。