海绵城市地块汇水区颗粒污染物的传输

目前我国海绵工程建设多集中在地块汇水区单元内开展,通过多个低影响开发(LID)设施协同完成地表径流水质水量的调控,但基于地块汇水区尺度下城市面源污染的产生和控制效果鲜有报道.本研究比较分析了不同硬化率地块汇水单元内的面源颗粒污染物晴天累积、降雨冲刷、地表径流及径流输出负荷状况.结果表明,地块汇水单元内硬质路面是面源颗粒污染物贡献的最主要的下垫面类型,中硬化率(61.1%)地块和高硬化率(73.6%)地块路面街尘累积量分别约占汇水区单元的88.4%(2.22～12.51 g·m~(-2))和90.1%(4.99～33.43 g·m~(-2)),对径流SS的输出贡献比率分别约为91.7%(0.97～7.34 g·m~(-2))和90.5%(0.92～18.77 g·m~(-2)),降雨径流SS污染负荷占比分别约为95.2%和83.1%,经LID设施处理后输出径流污染负荷约为地表径流的24.0%和40.2%.硬质路面的街尘晴天累积及降雨冲刷以150μm为主,地表径流及输出径流则以50μm粒径段为主,同时地块不透水比例的增加,细粒径(105μm)颗粒物的累积及冲刷分布增大(24.4%和106.4%),而粒径50μm的颗粒物在路面径流中的分布减小(12.4%).屋面的街尘累积、冲刷及降雨径流的粒径分布状况与硬质路面大致相似,但中硬化率地块(1 000μm)和高硬化率地块(250～450μm、45μm)在3个粒径段范围的颗粒物累积和冲刷相较于路面街尘粒径分布明显增加(1 000μm:58.1%和108.5%; 250～450μm:72.9%和41.8%;45μm:59.2%和64.8%).以上结果揭示了颗粒污染物在地块汇水区尺度下的污染全过程(累积-冲刷-输出)分布及LID设施对地块整体SS污染负荷的控制效果,可为地块汇水单元内LID设施工程绩效的科学评估提供重要参考.     

粗放型绿色屋顶对多环芳烃的控制效果

构建4个粗放型绿色屋顶中试设施,考察不同基质组成的设施在实际降雨条件下出水中16种多环芳烃(PAHs)质量浓度并与降雨、沥青屋面径流、空白对照设施的出水进行对比.结果表明,8场监测降雨事件中,4种模拟屋面设施出流PAHs的平均质量浓度分别为145、166、151、160 ng·L~(-1),沥青屋面和空白对照设施出流PAHs的平均质量浓度分别为900 ng·L-1和270 ng·L~(-1),4个模拟设施出流PAHs质量浓度显著低于沥青屋面和空白对照设施;从质量负荷控制的角度,4个模拟设施均能有效控制屋面径流PAHs负荷,与空白屋面相比,平均负荷削减率为71.76%.绿色屋顶对PAHs的去除机制以基质材料的截留及吸附为主,同样基质配比的情况下,增加基质层厚度,能改善设施对PAHs的去除效果.将传统沥青屋面改造为粗放型绿色屋顶,有助于控制屋面径流PAHs排放.     

低影响开发对城市内涝节点雨洪控制效果研究——不同降雨特性下的情景模拟

以中国福建省福州市晋安区解放溪流域高密度居民住宅区为例,针对不同降雨重现期、降雨历时和雨峰系数的降雨情景,利用PCSWMM模型模拟该地区的雨洪情况,并运用模型的低影响开发（LID）模块,研究7种不同LID用地布局情景对研究区内涝节点的雨洪控制效果.情景模拟结果表明：在不同降雨情景下,各LID用地布局情景会使节点的洪峰流量减小、积水时间减少、积水深度变小;植被浅沟措施和植被浅沟&绿色屋顶组合措施会使节点SS峰值浓度高于现状用地,其余布设情景下,SS峰值浓度均减小.LID措施对节点流量和水质的控制效果在低降雨重现期和长降雨历时的降雨情景下较为有效.在单个LID布设情景中,渗透铺装措施控制最佳,而组合LID布设情景中,渗透铺装&植被浅沟&绿色屋顶是最佳的组合控制措施.研究结果可为南方城市居民区实施海绵城市建设提供技术支持,并为地方制定相关规范和标准提供参考和借鉴.     

低影响开发(LID)的工程措施及其效果

低影响开发(Low Impact Development,LID)是一种采用源头控制理念实现雨水控制与利用的一种雨水管理方法。低影响开发对径流水文水质的作用效果不仅受到降雨强度、降雨时间、温度等环境因素的影响,还受到各种工程措施的材料、结构与组成的影响。文章总结了这些因素对低影响开发技术作用效果的影响,归纳低影响开发技术的现存问题,提出改善低影响开发技术的一些措施,可为低影响开发的应用与普及提供参考,从而有利于实现环境效益和城市发展的双赢。     

Life cycle assessment of low impact development technologies combined with conventional centralized water systems for the City of Atlanta,Georgia

Low-impact development (LID) technologies, such as bioretention areas, rooftop rainwater harvesting, and xeriscaping can control stormwater runoff, supply non-potable water, and landscape open space. This study examines a hybrid system (HS) that combines LID technologies with a centralized water system to lessen the burden on a conventional system (CS). CS is defined as the stormwater collection and water supply infrastructure, and the conventional landscaping choices in the City of Atlanta. The study scope is limited to five single-family residential zones (SFZs), classified R-1 through R-5, and four multi-family residential zones (MFZs), classified RG-2 through RG-5. Population density increases from 0.4 (R-1) to 62.2 (RG-5) persons per 1,000 m2. We performed a life cycle assessment (LCA) comparison of CS and HS using TRACI 2.1 to simulate impacts on the ecosystem, human health, and natural resources.We quantified the impact of freshwater consumption using the freshwater ecosystem impact (FEI) indicator. Test results indicate that HS has a higher LCA single score than CS in zones with a low population density; however, the difference becomes negligible as population density increases. Incorporating LID in SFZs and MFZs can reduce potable water use by an average of 50% and 25%, respectively; however, water savings are negligible in zones with high population density (i.e., RG-5) due to the diminished surface area per capita available for LID technologies. The results demonstrate that LID technologies effectively reduce outdoor water demand and therefore would be a good choice to decrease the water consumption impact in the City of Atlanta.

Open image in new window

     

Advances in LID BMPs research and practice for urban runoff control in China

China is at present experiencing a very rapid urbanization process, which has brought a number of adverse impacts upon the water environment. In particular, urban runoff quantity and quality control have emerged as one of the key concerns for municipal officials. One of the strategies being considered is the use of a Low Impact Development type of Best Management Practices (LID BMPs) for urban storm water runoff quantity and quality control. In this paper, the situation surrounding urban runoff control in China is reviewed first. Then the conventional strategy and technologies for the construction and management of urban drainage systems are discussed, while exploring their inherent dilemmas. The LID BMPs are then introduced to control urban runoff in the context of urban sustainable water systems. After the comprehensive analysis of the various LID BMPs, the advances in LID BMPs research and practice for urban runoff control in China are investigated and summarized. At last, the difficulties of implementing LID BMPs in China are discussed, and a direction for the future is proposed.     

从“Offsite”走向“Onsite”城市雨水管理理念的转变研究——美国俄勒冈州尤金市雨水管理经验借鉴

2014年底,住建部发布了《海绵城市建设技术指南——低影响开发雨水系统构建》,提出了城市不同层次规划中低影响开发的控制目标和相关要求,以及雨水管理的技术方法.海绵城市的相关研究成为热点,但对于国外先进城市海绵城市规划建设以及管理的直接经验借鉴仍然较少,这里通过重点介绍美国俄勒冈州尤金市雨水“Onsite”(雨水地块内处理)的管理理念、方法以及主要雨水管理设施的用地指标,以期为国内海绵城市的规划建设及管理提供参考.     

Testing of the Storm Water Management Model Low Impact Development Modules

Stormwater infrastructure designers and operators rely heavily on the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) to simulate stormwater and wastewater infrastructure performance. Since its inception in the late 1970s, improvements and extensions have been tested and evaluated rigorously to verify the accuracy of the model. As a continuation of this progress, the main objective of this study was to quantify how accurately SWMM simulates the hydrologic activity of low impact development (LID) storm control measures. Model performance was evaluated by quantitatively comparing empirical data to model results using a multievent, multiobjective calibration method. The calibration methodology utilized the PEST software, a Parameter ESTimation tool, to determine unmeasured hydrologic parameters for SWMM’s LID modules. The calibrated LID modules’ Nash–Sutcliffe efficiencies averaged 0.81; average percent bias (PBIAS) ?9%; average ratio of root mean square error to standard deviation of measured values 0.485; average index of agreement 0.94; and the average volume error, simulated vs. observed, was +9%. SWMM accurately predicted the timing of peak flows, but usually underestimated their magnitudes by 10%. The average volume reduction, measured outflow volume divided by inflow volume, was 48%. We had more difficulty in calibrating one study, an infiltration trench, which identified a significant limitation of the current version of the SWMM LID module; it cannot simulate lateral exfiltration of water out of the storage layers of a LID storm control measure. This limitation is especially severe for a deep LIDs, such as infiltration trenches. Nevertheless, SWMM satisfactorily simulated the hydrologic performance of eight of the nine LID practices.     

城市雨水系统中低影响开发与绿色水基础设施及其实例

城市化进程的急剧加快使得中国城市饱受暴雨侵袭的困扰。传统的排水机制是雨水排得越快越好,这就需要加大排水管径、增加排水泵站等,因此更多的的成本和更大的地下空间不可避免。另一方面,雨水完全可以成为资源,而不是污染源。基于以上事实,低影响开发(LID)技术被提出并正在成为城市雨水系统发展的趋势。LID技术从源头减少并延迟暴雨径流和峰值,使开发后的城市水文循环接近开发前的自然水文状态。而基于LID技术的绿色水基础设施如雨水花园、透水性铺装、植被浅沟和景观雨水调蓄池等正在越来越多的应用在城市,尤其是一些发达国家在这方面的技术十分成熟。中国起步较晚,只有少数发达城市进行了LID技术的尝试。但从可持续发展的角度来看,LID技术必将得到推广和应用。可以将LID技术与现有的雨水处理设施相结合,构建符合中国国情的城市雨水系统。     

基于海绵城市建设的低影响开发技术的功能分析

研究了基于海绵城市建设的低影响开发技术(LID)对场地开发前后自然水文状态的复原原理,分析了LID技术的主要功能,即在场地控制中采用源头处理或者分散处理的技术,从而达到增加雨水的蒸发量、渗透量,削减洪峰流量与径流量,延长峰现时间及同时净化雨水等目标。对LID的6项功能列清单,提出了功能列表并分析了功能多边形。对LID技术功能的分析,有助于了解LID的主要功能及LID的本质目标,为推进海绵城市的建设提供参考。