首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   1篇
  免费   1篇
综合类   1篇
污染及防治   1篇
  2013年   1篇
  2003年   1篇
排序方式: 共有2条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
Zeta电位法研究除草剂在土壤胶体中的吸附   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2       下载免费PDF全文
应用Zeta(ζ)电位法研究比较了扑草净和扑灭通在4种土壤胶体中的吸附.结果表明,当带有正电荷的除草剂在负电荷土壤表面吸附后,土壤表面的ζ电位有所增加,甚至使ζ电位从负转变成正.通过零电荷点计算得到除草剂和土壤之间的吸附常数和Gibbs自由能,并由经典的振荡平衡法得到相近结果.  相似文献   
2.
Abstract

False positive responses on an atrazine (6‐chloro‐N‐ethyl‐N'‐(l‐methylethyl)‐1, 3, 5‐triazine‐2, 4‐diamine) immunoassay kit were investigated to explain possible causes for these occurences. Ground water samples were evaluated with the immunoassay kit and positive responses (>0.20 μg L‐1) were confirmed using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Non‐confirming samples (false positives) were analyzed for seven additional compounds on GC. Resulting GC/MS and GC analyses showed that 70% of the false positives could be attributed to two compounds. Prometon (6‐methoxy‐N,N'‐bis(l‐methylethyl)‐1, 3, 5‐triazine‐2, 4‐diamine) was responsible for the majority (64%) of the false positive responses The atrazine metabolite, deethylatrazine (2‐chloro‐4‐amino‐6‐isopropylamino‐1, 3, 5‐triazine), was responsible for the other 6% of the false positives measured. Unattributed false positives (30%) were probably due to an overestimation of pesticide concentrations in the kit's lower detection range.  相似文献   
1
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号