排序方式: 共有19条查询结果,搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
填埋场沼气发电的温室气体减排效益分析 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
填埋场沼气是垃圾卫生填埋场产生的可利用资源.以深圳下坪垃圾填埋场为例,定量分析垃圾填埋气体发电的温室气体减排效益.结果表明,填埋场沼气发电具有很好的经济效益和环境效益,可作为与发达国家进行CDM(清洁发展机制)项目合作的优先技术领域. 相似文献
2.
LFG控制利用工程基本参数的试验研究 总被引:5,自引:0,他引:5
通过深圳市玉龙坑垃圾填埋场的现场抽气试验。本文进行了填埋气本安全控制与回收利用工程基本参数的研究。 相似文献
3.
以欧洲最大的一家垃圾填埋场的运行为实例,分别从集气质量、抽吸负压、投资费用等方面,对垂直气井和横向气管2种不同的集气方式进行分析比较,总结其各自的特点及适用范围,为国内卫生填埋场的建设及运行控制提供参照和建议。 相似文献
4.
通过选取3种不同的填埋气预测模型:IPCC模型、中国填埋气估算模型、德国模型,结合沈阳市老虎冲填埋场的实际情况,对各参数进行了修订,从而预测老虎冲填埋场填埋气产量情况,并分析比较各模型预测结果。结果表明,2003—2011年,3种模型反映了相同的填埋气变化趋势,趋于上升状态;2012—2025年,由于填埋量发生变化,IPCC模型与中国填埋气估算模型和德国模型的填埋气变化情况相反,呈下降趋势。3种模型预测的填埋气产量的峰值大小为:中国填埋气估算模型为3.3×107m3/a,IPCC模型为2.1×107m3/a,德国模型为9.8×106m3/a。根据实际产气情况进行对比,发现德国模型更符合实际情况。 相似文献
5.
垃圾填埋气制汽车燃料气的主要环境影响分析 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
文章从垃圾填埋气的危害、垃圾填埋气制汽车燃料气的环境影响、压缩垃圾填埋气代替燃油的环境影响等方面进行了具体分析。提出垃圾填埋气制汽车燃料气既降低了垃圾卫生填埋场的安全隐患,减少包括温室气体在内的大气污染物排放量,又可代替不可再生能源,降低汽车尾气的污染程度,环境效益显著。 相似文献
6.
7.
8.
对生物反应器填埋场启动的优化方案进行了考察,以每周回灌渗滤液量分别为1.6,0.8,0.2m3的3个模拟试验柱(记作R1、R2、R3)和1个每周回灌0.1m3清水的对比试验柱(记作R4)为研究对象,分析试验柱进出水水质变化和填埋气体产生情况.结果表明,较高的回灌水力负荷能够加速垃圾中有机质的溶出,提高填埋气体的产生速率.R1~R4的CODCr净流出总量之比为6.75:3.74:1.16:1.00,累计气体产生量之比为100.00:7.92:4.78:1.30.启动初期采用较大的回灌水力负荷不利于生物膜的附着生长,可先采用较低的回灌负荷进而逐步提高.较大的回灌量有利于加速填埋场的稳定化,R1在45周时出水水质已呈现“老龄”渗滤液的部分特征,CODCr降低到1870mg/L,BOD5/CODCr降至0.12.气候条件对回灌渗滤液的污染负荷有重要影响,进水氨氮浓度旱季最高值3475mg/L,雨季最低值1274mg/L.生物反应器填埋场的启动时间宜选择在雨季. 相似文献
9.
10.
Zishen Mou Charlotte Scheutz Peter Kjeldsen 《Waste management (New York, N.Y.)》2014,34(11):2251-2259
The biochemical methane potential (BMP) is an essential parameter when using first order decay (FOD) landfill gas (LFG) generation models to estimate methane (CH4) generation from landfills. Different categories of waste (mixed, shredder and sludge waste) with a low-organic content and temporarily stored combustible waste were sampled from four Danish landfills. The waste was characterized in terms of physical characteristics (TS, VS, TC and TOC) and the BMP was analyzed in batch tests. The experiment was set up in triplicate, including blank and control tests. Waste samples were incubated at 55 °C for more than 60 days, with continuous monitoring of the cumulative CH4 generation. Results showed that samples of mixed waste and shredder waste had similar BMP results, which was in the range of 5.4–9.1 kg CH4/ton waste (wet weight) on average. As a calculated consequence, their degradable organic carbon content (DOCC) was in the range of 0.44–0.70% of total weight (wet waste). Numeric values of both parameters were much lower than values of traditional municipal solid waste (MSW), as well as default numeric values in current FOD models. The sludge waste and temporarily stored combustible waste showed BMP values of 51.8–69.6 and 106.6–117.3 kg CH4/ton waste on average, respectively, and DOCC values of 3.84–5.12% and 7.96–8.74% of total weight. The same category of waste from different Danish landfills did not show significant variation. This research studied the BMP of Danish low-organic waste for the first time, which is important and valuable for using current FOD LFG generation models to estimate realistic CH4 emissions from modern landfills receiving low-organic waste. 相似文献