高效液相色谱法测定水中7种三嗪类除草剂

采用液液萃取和固相萃取两种方法预处理,高效液相色谱二极管阵列检测器测定水中7种三嗪类除草剂,选择了合适的检测波长和梯度淋洗条件。方法在0.100 mg/L~2.00 mg/L范围内线性良好,检出限为0.06μg/L~0.15μg/L,水样平行测定的RSD为1.6%~6.5%,加标回收率为95.0%~106%。     

气相色谱法同时测定水中28种多氯联苯单体

采用液液萃取-浓硫酸磺化净化-气相色谱电子捕获检测器同时测定水中28种多氯联苯单体,必要时利用质谱选择离子监测模式定性,考察了萃取溶剂种类和体积及盐析效应对测定的影响,比较了硫酸磺化和弗罗里硅土柱对萃取液的净化效果。方法在1.00μg/L~47.6μg/L范围内线性良好,当取样体积为200 mL时,方法检出限为0.001μg/L~0.002μg/L,基体加标回收率为95.8%~103%,相对标准偏差≤18.7%。     

气相色谱法测定地表水中百菌清和菊酯类农药

采用正己烷萃取地表水中的百菌清和6种菊酯类农药,通过毛细管气相色谱法-电子捕获检测器(GC-ECD)定性定量。供试农药的线性范围:百菌清为10.0μg/L～200μg/L,6种菊酯类为50.0μg/L～1 000μg/L;方法检出限分别为:百菌清0.054μg/L,甲氰菊酯0.62μg/L,三氟氯氰菊酯0.68μg/L,氯菊酯0.40μg/L,氯氰菊酯0.65μg/L,氰戊菊酯0.78μg/L,溴氰菊酯0.15μg/L;对地表水样品3个质量浓度水平的平均加标回收率为91.3%～118%,6次平行测定的RSD<5%。     

水中有机磷农药分析前处理方法探讨

分别采用液-液萃取、固相萃取前处理方法,提取水中10种常见的有机磷农药,对比了这两种提取方法的测定结果、经济成本、花费时间及对环境的影响,建议逐步用固相萃取法取代液？液萃取法提取水中有机磷农药。     

液液萃取-气质联用法测定水中20种农药类有机物

采用液液萃取-气质联用法同时测定水中20种农药类有机物。对前处理过程中萃取剂的选择、用量,萃取时间,盐析剂用量,有机改进剂的加入等条件进行了优化,使得各组分在0．500μg/L～50．0μg/L范围内线性良好。方法检出限为0．02μg/L～0．19μg/L;平行测定7次混合标准溶液,RSD为0．3％～9．1％;对20种农药类有机物混合标准溶液进行加标回收试验,回收率为90．5％～110％。该方法优化了《生活饮用水标准检验方法》（ GB 5750-2006）中农药类有机污染物的检测方法,满足常规测定的要求。     

液液萃取—GC-MS法同时测定石化废水中双酚A和邻苯二甲酸二乙酯

建立了液液萃取（LLE）—气相色谱-质谱（GC-MS）法同时测定石化废水中双酚A（BPA）和邻苯二甲酸二乙酯（DEP）的新方法,对液液萃取条件进行了优化。最佳的液液萃取条件为：萃取剂为乙酸乙酯,水样调成酸性（pH<2）,每次加入萃取剂0.1 mL/mL、盐析剂NaCl 0.1 g/mL,萃取次数为6次,每次萃取时间为2 min。实验结果表明：在质量浓度1~100 mg/L的范围内,BPA和DEP测定标准曲线的线性关系良好;BPA和DEP的检出限（LOD）分别为5.18 μg/L和0.89 μg/L,定量限（LOQ）分别为17.11 μg/L和2.96 μg/L,回收率为81.4 %~124.9 %,相对标准偏差（RSD）（n=7）小于5.5 %。     

LLE-GC-MS法测定水中27种有机农药

建立了同时测定水中27种有机农药的LLE-GC-MS法。该法前处理前需调节水样pH值2,不加甲醇作为改性剂,以1:1(V/V)正己烷-石油醚为萃取溶剂进行液液萃取,GC-MS法进行检测。方法在各目标化合物质量浓度0.010~0.500 mg/L范围内线性良好,相关系数R2均0.995,检出限为0.021~0.250μg/L,加标回收率为73.6%~113.6%,相对标准偏差RSD为4.0%~14.1%,适用于水中27种有机农药的检测。     

Qualitative Study of Organic Compounds in Wastewaters of a Swine Slaughterhouse

The main purpose of this work was the preliminary qualitative study of organic compounds in wastewaters of swine slaughterhouses. The samples were collected in a local abattoir and submitted to Liquid-Liquid Extraction (LLE) and Solid-phase Extraction (SPE) with XAD-4^TM resin as stationary phase. The instrumental analysis was performed by Gas Chromatography with Mass Spectrometer Detector (GC/MSD). The compounds present in the LLE and SPE extracts were identified by the GC/MSD library (Wiley). The results pointed out that SPE and LLE can extract practically the same classes of compounds at the same amounts. LLE works well for the extraction of polar organic compounds, with acidified samples, while SPE presents a better performance for the extraction of less polar organic compounds. Aldehydes were main class of the compounds extracted by SPE and LLE and decenal was the major aldehyde identified. Fatty alcohols and carboxylic acids were also identified but in minor proportions.     

SPE-GC-MS/SIM测定水节霉发生地河水中半挥发性有机物

为测定水节霉发生地河水中ρ(SVOCs)(SVOCs为半挥发性有机物),比较了LLE(液液萃取)和SPE(固相萃取)前处理法提取加标空白水样中ρ(SVOCs)的GC-MS/SIM测定结果,确定并采用重现性好的SPE-GC-MS/SIM法测定了水节霉发生地河水中的ρ(SVOCs). 结果表明,LLE和SPE法对SVOCs的加标回收率分别为41.8%~121.5%和31.5%~124.4%,相对标准偏差分别为6.0%~18.0%和0.9%~14.5%,二者回收率相差不大,但SPE法的相对标准偏差小于LLE法,SPE法重现性较好,因此采用SPE-GC-MS/SIM法测定2011年2月水节霉发生地河水中的ρ(SVOCs),共检出29种SVOCs,其中ρ(邻苯二甲酸二乙酯)、ρ(∑PAHs)、ρ(硝基苯)、ρ(1,2-二氯苯)和ρ(1,4-二氯苯)分别为1 020.59、532.14、43.39、38.52和19.57 ng/L,均未超出GB 5749—2006《生活饮用水卫生标准》相关限值,表明水节霉发生地未发生SVOCs污染.      

Detection of geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol by liquid-liquid extraction-gas chromatograph mass spectrum (LLE-GCMS)and solid phase extraction-gas chromatograph mass spectrum (SPE-GCMS)

Two sample preparation methods were introduced and compared in this paper to establish a simple, quick and exact analysis of geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol. LC-18 column was employed in solid phase extraction (SPE), 1.0 mL of hexane was adopted in liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), and the extracts were analyzed by gas chromatograph mass spectrum (GCMS) in selected ion mode. Mean recoveries of SPE were low for 2-methylisoborneol (2-MIB) and geosmin (GSM) with values below 50%. For LLE, the recoveries were satisfyingly above 50% for 2-MIB and 80% for GSM. Detection limits of the LLE method were as low as 1.0 ng/L for GSM and 5.0 ng/L for 2-MIB. A year-long investigation on odor chemicals of drinking water in Shanghai demonstrated that in the summer, there was a serious odor problem induced by a high concentration of 2-MIB. The highest concentration of 152.82 ng/L appeared in July in raw water, while GSM flocculation was minimal with concentrations below odor threshold.