考虑开挖扰动和基质吸力影响的基坑边坡安全性研究

在传统的边坡安全性分析中 ,人们都不考虑开挖扰动和基质吸力的影响。笔者通过试验 ,研究了开挖扰动对土体工程性质的影响 ,并且建立了考虑开挖扰动和基质吸力影响的基坑边坡安全性分析模型 ,还给出了计算实例。研究结果表明 ,开挖扰动和基质吸力对边坡安全系数有较大的影响。     

砼芯水泥土复合桩在基坑支护工程中的应用与研究

砼芯水泥土复合桩是一种新型的基坑支护方法,即在水泥土搅拌桩中插入钢筋混凝土预制小方桩,形成一种新的复合桩体,兼有受力和止水的双重作用,并采用两排中间用圈梁相连的门型结构提高了支护结构的受力特性。该支护方案在南京某深基坑工程中得到了成功应用。本文分析了该新方法的结构特点、简要介绍了其设计计算方法,并结合有限元数值模拟和实际的监测数据与排桩方案进行分析比较。研究结果表明,该新型基坑支护形式取得了良好的支护和经济效果,具有重要的应用前景。     

大型地下方厅多导洞施工力学效应分析

针对北京城铁 13号线东直门站地下方厅开挖跨度大、覆盖层薄、地质条件极差的施工难题 ,笔者采用三维有限元数值模型 ,模拟开挖支护施工流程 ,考虑到围岩介质的复杂特性 ,施工作业方式 ,包括分布开挖工序 ,支护结构形式和施作时机 ,以及开挖面推进过程中的空间效应 ;按形变压力理论 ,选用“连续体”计算模型 ,采用增量变弹性法和增量叠代的混合法进行计算分析 ,对多导洞开挖支护施工方案进行了计算分析 ;基本掌握了在覆土厚度小的情况下开挖大跨平顶直墙方厅时 ,周围土体的应力分布特征和变形特性 ,对于优化施工方案、修改支护参数、采取局部加固措施起到了重要作用。实践表明采用多导洞施工方案是科学合理的 ,有利地保证了周边环境和施工安全。     

Construction Simplicity and Cost as Selection Criteria Between Two Types of Constructed Wetlands Treating Highway Runoff

Two free water surface (FWS) and two subsurface flow (SSF) pilot-size wetlands were constructed for the evaluation of their performance in treating highway runoff (HRO) in the heart of the Mediterranean region, the island of Crete, at the southernmost point of Greece. Detailed recordings of the resources involved during the construction allowed a thorough calculation of the cost of the systems and the requirements in materials, man-hours, and equipment. The two identical FWS systems had a surface area of 33 m² each, while the two identical SSF covered 32 m² each. One FWS and one SSF, named FWS12 and SSF12, respectively, were designed with a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 12 h, with each one capable of treating a maximum HRO of 12.6 m³/day. The other couple, named FWS24 and SSF24, respectively, was designed with an HRT of 24 h, with each receiving a maximum HRO of 6.3 m³/days. An influent storage tank was required to hold the runoff during the common storm events and control the flow rate (and the hydraulic retention time) into the wetlands. This construction represented 25% of the total construction cost, while 5% was spent on the influent automated (and sun-powered) control and distribution system, from the storage tank to the wetlands. The respective total cost allocated to the two SSF systems (€14,676) was approximately 10% higher than that of the FWS (€13,596), mainly due to the three different-sized gravel layers used in the SSF substrate compared to the topsoil used in the FWS, which tripled the cost and placement time. The Total Annual Economic Cost (TAEC) was €1799/year and €1847/year for the FWS and SSF pair, respectively. TAEC was also used to compare the economic efficiency of the systems per cubic meter of HRO treated and kilograms of COD and TSS removed from the wetlands during their first operational year. Based on these estimations, FWS12 recorded the lowest TAEC_COD and TAEC_TSS values (€89.09/kg and €43.69/kg, respectively) compared to the other three systems, presenting a more economically favorable option.