首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

湖滨带氧化还原环境的时空变化及其环境效应
引用本文:王洪君,王为东,尹澄清,潘宏凯,卢金伟.湖滨带氧化还原环境的时空变化及其环境效应[J].环境科学学报,2007,27(1):23-27.
作者姓名:王洪君  王为东  尹澄清  潘宏凯  卢金伟
作者单位:1. 中国科学院生态环境研究中心,环境水质学国家重点实验室,北京,100085;中国科学院研究生院,北京,100039
2. 中国科学院生态环境研究中心,环境水质学国家重点实验室,北京,100085
3. 上海立信会计学院,上海,201620
基金项目:中国科学院基金 , 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划) , 水利部科技创新项目
摘    要:在太湖梅梁湾,沿开阔水体至湖滨带方向,对植被型湖滨带(A区)、裸露型湖滨带(B区)和开阔水体(D区)水体中DO和水/沉积物Eh进行为期1a的现场观测.结果发现,梅梁湾水体DO时空变化明显.B区和D区水体中DO常年饱和,而A区DO浓度较低(年均(5.5±1.7)mg·L-1).在植物生长季,从开阔水体至湖滨植被区溶解氧浓度从12.7 mg·L-1降到4.5 mg·L-1;在非植物生长季则从9.7 mg·L-1降到6.2mg·L-1.湖滨带水体Eh在150 mV左右波动,空间变化趋势与溶解氧变化同步.沉积物Eh也表现出明显的时空变化,在植物生长季,各区沉积物均处于较强的还原状态(-158~-101 mV);而在非植物生长季,由开阔水体向植被型湖滨带Eh逐渐升高.在沉积物的垂直剖面上,开阔水体Eh自表层沉积物向下逐渐降低,而在A区的植被覆盖区则是先降低,大概在5 cm深处开始逐渐升高,于20 cm深左右达到峰值.根据上述植被型湖滨带氧化还原环境的特点,可以推知进行湖滨带生态修复,有利于去除湖泊氮污染.

关 键 词:植被型湖滨带  裸露型湖滨带  开阔水体  DO  Eh
文章编号:0253-2468(2007)01-0023-05
收稿时间:7/19/2006 4:05:35 PM
修稿时间:07 19 2006 12:00AM

Spatio-temporal variation of redox condition in the littoral area and its environmental effects
WANG Hongjun,WANG Weidong,YIN Chengqing,PAN Hongkai and LU Jinwei.Spatio-temporal variation of redox condition in the littoral area and its environmental effects[J].Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,2007,27(1):23-27.
Authors:WANG Hongjun  WANG Weidong  YIN Chengqing  PAN Hongkai and LU Jinwei
Institution:1. SKLEAC, Research Center for Eeo-Environmental Sciences, CAS, Beijing 100085; 2. Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039; 3. Shanghai Lixin University of Commerce. Shanghai 201620
Abstract:In-situ DO and Eh in the macrophyte-covered (A) and non-macrophyte-covered (B) littoral zones and the pelagic zone (D) were measured along the gradient from the open water to the littoral area for one year. The results showed that strong spatio-temporal variation of DO occurred in Meiliang Bay. In B and D zones, DO was all-year saturated, while DO was relatively low in A zone (annually (5.5  1.7) mg  L-1 ). DO decreased in the water column from the open water to the macrophyte-covered area (12.7 mg L-1 to 4.5 mg L-1, 9.7 mg L-1 to 6.2 mg L-1, in the growing and non-growing seasons, respectively).The water-column Eh was about 150 mV and its spatial variation was similar with DO. Eh in the sediment also distinctively displayed spatio-temporal variation. In the growing season, the sediment in every zone was in a strong reductive state(-158 ~ -101 mV). In the non-growing season, Eh increased gradually from D to A zone. In the vertical section of sediment, Eh decreased gradually from the top to the bottom sediment in D zone, while in A zone, firstly, Eh decreased, at 5 cm depth, Eh increased and the maximum occurred at 20 cm depth. These results indicated restoration of littoral zones could remove large amounts of nitrogen.
Keywords:macrophyte-covered littoral zone  non-macrophyte-covered littoral zone  pelagic zone  DO  E_h
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号