首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


The environmental audit. II. Application to stream network design
Authors:James A. Perry  David J. Schaeffer  Harold W. Kerster  Edwin E. Herricks
Affiliation:(1) College of Forestry Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, 110 Green Hall 1530 North Cleveland Avenue, 55108 St. Paul, Minnesota, USA;(2) Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, 2200 Churchill Road, 62706 Springfield, Illinois, USA;(3) Environmental Studies Center, California State University, 95819 Sacramento, California, USA;(4) Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois, 208 North Romine, 61801 Urbana, Illinois, USA
Abstract:The planning and execution of water quality management programs requires careful collection and analysis of data coupled with a systematic review and analysis of programmatic success. The environmental audit is a tool which facilitates improved water quality planning and management. This article demonstrates the utility of the environmental audit by reviewing portions of a comprehensive review of the water quality management program for the state of Idaho. The audit is a tool which forces careful design of a sampling program before data are collected. In the audit approach, program objectives are clearly stated prior to initiation of sampling. Stated objectives are also evaluated regularly to identify tension points, that is, conflicts between expectations and reality. In the example taken from Idaho, a management review team followed a directive to redesign the water quality monitoring program. We present a summary of the redesign as proposed by that team, to illustrate the results of a typical review of monitoring programs. That summary is followed by an example of how the proposed program would differ if the audit approach had been used. The two approaches offered both coincident and conflicting recommendations. Management review team and audit recommendations for lake sampling programs were similar even though a different process was used to develop the recommendations. The most striking contrast between the two results lies in the review team's approach to the problem. The directives followed, and the team's responses, concentrate on tools, such as increasing biological monitoring or reliance on monthly BWMP stations. In contrast, the audit results stress addressing management questions for which clear objectives have been stated, depending on specific tools only as needed to meet stated objectives. Although the audit does integrate externalities in its structure, it is little affected by economic or political influences. A major strength of the audit approach is its ability to provide defensible data for management decision making.
Keywords:Environmental audit  Idaho  Water quality data  Water quality management
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号