Environmental Ethics and Science: Resilience as a Moral Boundary |
| |
Authors: | Felipe Bravo Osorio |
| |
Institution: | 1.Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios – Uniminuto,Bogotá,Colombia |
| |
Abstract: | Science has always been tightly associated with environmental ethics in a way traditional ethics has not. However, despite this proximity, science has had a merely informational role, where it must inform ethics but not intervene in ethical judgment. Science is seen as an amoral enterprise, requiring an ethics rather than recommending one. In this paper I try to go against this common view. First, I give a critique of the naturalistic fallacy following the lines of Frankena. Then I go on to describe the two possible roles science can have in ethical though, and in environmental ethics in particular. As it turns out, science does not only inform ethics, but can actually have moral import and intervene in moral judgment. Finally, from an ecocentric point of view, I try to illustrate this last point by construing the ecological notion of resilience as a moral boundary—a scientifically determined boundary between right and wrong. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|