| 连续采样与五日法采样效果及费用的对比分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孙建国,李东方.连续采样与五日法采样效果及费用的对比分析[J].干旱环境监测,1996,10(1):33-35. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孙建国 李东方 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 乌鲁木齐市环境科研监测中心站 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 通过对连续采样与五日法采样五种方法监测结果及所需费用的比较，得出连续采样方法监测结果更具有代表性，合理性，一次性投资大，但运行费用并不高的结论。
|
| 关 键 词： | 连续采样 五日法 运行费用 环境监测 取样 |
CONTRAST ANALYSIS ON RESULT AND EXPENDITURE BETWEEN CONTINUOUS SAMPLING AND FIVE-DAY SAMPLING |
| |
| Sun Jianguo, Li Donfang and Han Wenhui.CONTRAST ANALYSIS ON RESULT AND EXPENDITURE BETWEEN CONTINUOUS SAMPLING AND FIVE-DAY SAMPLING[J].Arid Environmental Monitoring,1996,10(1):33-35. |
| |
| Authors: | Sun Jianguo Li Donfang and Han Wenhui |
| |
| Institution: | UrumqiEnvironmental Scientific Research and Monitoning Center |
| |
| Abstract: | On the basis of contrast analysis on result and expenditure between coninuous sampling and five-day piing, the result from continous sampling had better represnativeness and rationalization, the lump-sum cost of continuous sampling is bigger but the operadon cost is smaller. |
| |
| Keywords: | Continuous sampling Five-day sampling Monitoring Operation cost Contrast analysis |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
