Integrating the social and natural sciences in environmental research: a discussion paper |
| |
Authors: | Veronica Strang |
| |
Institution: | (1) Department of Anthropology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1001, New Zealand |
| |
Abstract: | This paper considers the practical and intellectual challenges that attend efforts to integrate the social and natural sciences
in environmental research, and the broader political, social and economic context in which this takes place. Based on the
experiences of researchers in Australia—but with obvious relevance for researchers in many countries—it is the outcome of
an interdisciplinary workshop which brought together social and natural scientists involved in environmental management. This
event and the wider discussions that followed were initiated to enable researchers to exchange ideas about the obstacles to
interdisciplinary collaboration, and to discuss ways to overcome these. The paper provides a summary of the issues and proposes
some guidelines for interdisciplinary collaboration. These may be summarised as follows:
•
|
There is an overarching need to begin with—and maintain—intellectual, social and practical equalities throughout the entire
research process.
|
•
|
There is a need, in the academe and in public discourse, for reflexive critiques of the conceptual models that are used to
consider ‘the environment’, to challenge the dualism that separates and compartmentalises ‘nature’ as a kind of technical
ecology.
|
•
|
Research design needs to begin with an in-depth discussion about theory, and efforts to ensure that all participants are able
to make use of (or at least see where their research fits into) a model that conceptually integrates socio-cultural and biophysical
complexities.
|
•
|
Participants need to have equal input into the design of all stages of the research: the key questions, the basic approach,
and the kinds of methods, data and analysis that will be used.
|
•
|
Collaboration requires a significant amount of time to be spent in communication between the participants, so that all achieve
at least a basic understanding of the types of theory, methods, data and analysis used by the others. Time and funding should
be built into the process to enable this.
|
•
|
In major research projects, there is a case for employing someone with appropriate expertise, to facilitate the team’s internal
communications and to liaise with potential research users.
|
•
|
Consideration should be given to the ‘profile’ of collaborative research projects, so that participants can feel confident
that their disciplinary identities will not be denigrated, appropriated, or consumed by assimilation.
|
•
|
In developing timetables and budgets for research, there needs to be greater recognition of different temporal needs. Rather
than imposing a schedule that reflects only some disciplinary timeframes, each disciplinary area should be allocated time
and funds in accord with its particular temporal realities.
|
•
|
Interdisciplinary projects have to deal with types of data that are rarely comparable, and do not mesh readily. Collaborators
should consider how their data will be managed and whether they can be incorporated into—or at least linked with—systemic
schemes that will encourage integrative ways of managing and possibly reconceptualising their information.
|
•
|
Rather than being homogenised, the outputs of collaborative research should reflect the diverse needs and qualities of each
of the disciplines involved. Consideration should therefore be given to whether (and how) outputs will be integrated or at
least positioned to inform and complement each other
|
•
|
Project designers should be bold in allocating realistic amounts of time and funds to support the kinds of changes in research
design that will lead to successful interdisciplinary collaborations.
|
In collaboration with a range of social and natural scientists. The workshop that initiated this paper was attended by the
following researchers and resource managers: Eva Abal (Natural scientist, Scientific Coordinator, Healthy Waterways, Queensland)
Lyn Aitkin (at the time of the workshop, Senior Natural Resource Officer, Queensland Government, Natural Resources and Mines,
now Policy and Research Coordinator with the Department of Justice and Attorney-General) John Bradley (Anthropologist, Monash
University) Leah Burns (Anthropologist, Griffith University) Elaine Green (Geologist, Healthy Waterways Liaison Officer, Queensland)
Lesley Jolly (Anthropologist, University of Queensland) Geoff Lawrence (Sociologist, University of Queensland) Helen Ross
(Interdisciplinary Social Scientist, University of Queensland) Marie Seeman (Post-graduate student, University of Western
Australia) Veronica Strang (Anthropologist, University of Auckland) Franca Tamisari (Anthropologist, University of Queensland)
Sandy Toussaint (Anthropologist, University of Western Australia) Though the following were not at the workshop, they also
provided informal input to the discussion: Karen Bakker (Assistant Professor of Geography, University of British Colombia)
Damien Burrows (Freshwater biologist, James Cook University) Susie Chapman (Queensland Government, Natural Resources and Mines
Community Support Officer) Allan Dale (Queensland Government, Natural Resources and Mines, General Manager of Regional NRM
Taskforce) Steve Dawson (Environmental Scientist, Northern Gulf Regional Management Group) Michael Digby (Land and Sea Management
Coordinator, Northern Gulf Regional Management Group) Ruth Dow (Queensland Government, Natural Resources and Mines, Policy
Officer, Water Planning) Jim Fewings (Environmental Protection Agency) Stephanie Hogan (Geologist, Queensland Government,
Natural Resources and Mines) Brad Jorgenson (Psychologist, University of Queensland) Rob Lait (Hydrogeologist, Australasian
Groundwater and Environmental Consultants) Annette Magee (Policy Officer, Water Planning, Brisbane City Council) Mark O’Donahue
(South-East Queensland Water Corporation/Healthy Waterways, Queensland) Annie Ross (Archaeologist/Anthropologist, University
of Queensland) Jenifer Simpson (Researcher, Conservationist, Queensland) Viv Sinnamon (Geographer/Anthropologist and Community
Support Officer, Burnett-Mary Regional Group for Natural Resource Management) Michael Strong (Archaeologist, Consultant, ‘Archaeo’,
Brisbane) John Tisdall (Economist, Griffith University) Robin Trotter (Historian, Griffith University) Adrian Volders (Executive
Officer, Natural Resource Management, South-East Queensland) Richard Walton (Hydrologist, WRM Water and Environment, Brisbane)
Ian Webb (Environmental scientist, Northern Gulf Regional Management Group).
Readers should send their comments on this paper to BhaskarNath@aol.com within 3 months of publication of this issue.
|
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|