| 试论环境行政诉讼 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 潘宁炜. 试论环境行政诉讼[J]. 环境导报, 1995, 0(3) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 潘宁炜 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 江苏省环境保护局 南京210013 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 审理环境行政诉讼案件,既涉及实体法又涉及程序法的应用。鉴于环境污染的潜伏性、流动性、交叉性等特征,应确认环境行政诉讼专属地域管辖和共同上级指定管辖,应正确界定行政补偿与行政侵权赔偿,环境保护行政主管部门不能作为行政诉讼第三人,应对举证责任另作特别法律规定。
|
| 关 键 词： | 环境行政诉讼 管辖 行政补偿 行政侵权赔偿 诉讼第三人 举证 |
Brief Discussion on Environmental Administration Litigation |
| |
| Pan Ningwei. Brief Discussion on Environmental Administration Litigation[J]. Environment Herald, 1995, 0(3) |
| |
| Authors: | Pan Ningwei |
| |
| Affiliation: | Pan Ningwei |
| |
| Abstract: | It deals with application of law of entity and procedure when reviewing litigation cases of environmental administration. For characteristics of potential. fluidity and crossness of environmental pollution, it should be realized thatenvironmental administrative litigation belongs particularly to regional jurisdiction and common higher authority's designated jurisdiction. It should correctly divide administrative compensation and administrative tort compensation. Administrative department of environmental protection can not act as third person for administrative litigation. It should have particular law regulation for responsibility of proof putting. |
| |
| Keywords: | environment administrative litigation jurisdiction administrative compensation administrative tort compensation third person for administrative litigation proof putting |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
