首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

砷污染土壤复合淋洗修复技术研究
引用本文:陈寻峰,李小明,陈灿,杨麒,邓琳静,谢伟强,钟宇,黄斌,杨伟强,张志贝. 砷污染土壤复合淋洗修复技术研究[J]. 环境科学, 2016, 37(3): 1147-1155
作者姓名:陈寻峰  李小明  陈灿  杨麒  邓琳静  谢伟强  钟宇  黄斌  杨伟强  张志贝
作者单位:湖南大学环境科学与工程学院, 长沙 410082;环境生物与控制教育部重点实验室(湖南大学), 长沙 410082;湖南省环境保护科学研究院, 长沙 410004;湖南大学环境科学与工程学院, 长沙 410082;环境生物与控制教育部重点实验室(湖南大学), 长沙 410082;湖南省环境保护科学研究院, 长沙 410004;湖南大学环境科学与工程学院, 长沙 410082;环境生物与控制教育部重点实验室(湖南大学), 长沙 410082;湖南大学环境科学与工程学院, 长沙 410082;环境生物与控制教育部重点实验室(湖南大学), 长沙 410082;湖南大学环境科学与工程学院, 长沙 410082;环境生物与控制教育部重点实验室(湖南大学), 长沙 410082;湖南大学环境科学与工程学院, 长沙 410082;环境生物与控制教育部重点实验室(湖南大学), 长沙 410082;湖南大学环境科学与工程学院, 长沙 410082;环境生物与控制教育部重点实验室(湖南大学), 长沙 410082;湖南大学环境科学与工程学院, 长沙 410082;环境生物与控制教育部重点实验室(湖南大学), 长沙 410082;湖南大学环境科学与工程学院, 长沙 410082;环境生物与控制教育部重点实验室(湖南大学), 长沙 410082
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(51378188,51478170);国际科技合作专项(2012DFB30030-03,2013DFG91190)
摘    要:土壤砷污染问题日益严重,淋洗法是修复砷污染土壤的一种有效方法.本研究以砷污染土壤为研究对象,通过批量振荡淋洗实验,将5种常用淋洗剂进行组合复合淋洗,探索最佳复合淋洗组合,对淋洗前后土壤进行形态分析,并通过3种不同污染程度土壤的修复效果比较,研究复合淋洗的适用性.结果表明,复合淋洗效果优于单一淋洗效果,能够很好地提高砷的去除率.当采用4 h 0.5 mol·L~(-1)Na OH+4 h 0.1 mol·L~(-1)EDTA进行复合二步淋洗时土壤砷的去除率从66.73%提高到91.83%,砷含量由186 mg·kg~(-1)降至15.2 mg·kg~(-1),为最佳淋洗组合.其次,研究结果还表明,淋洗前后土壤中砷的形态发生改变,有效态比例得到有效降低,0.5 mol·L~(-1)Na OH+0.1 mol·L~(-1)EDTA适用于铝型砷含量较高的砷污染土壤,0.5 mol·L~(-1)OX+0.5 mol·L~(-1)Na OH适用于铁型砷含量较高的砷污染土壤.

关 键 词:砷污染  土壤  修复  复合淋洗  形态
收稿时间:2015-08-06
修稿时间:2015-10-26

Mixture Leaching Remediation Technology of Arsenic Contaminated Soil
CHEN Xun-feng,LI Xiao-ming,CHEN Can,YANG Qi,DENG Lin-jing,XIE Wei-qiang,ZHONG Yu,HUANG Bin,YANG Wei-qiang and ZHANG Zhi-bei. Mixture Leaching Remediation Technology of Arsenic Contaminated Soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Science, 2016, 37(3): 1147-1155
Authors:CHEN Xun-feng  LI Xiao-ming  CHEN Can  YANG Qi  DENG Lin-jing  XIE Wei-qiang  ZHONG Yu  HUANG Bin  YANG Wei-qiang  ZHANG Zhi-bei
Affiliation:College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China;Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, China;Hunan Research Academy of Environment Sciences, Changsha 410004, China;College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China;Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, China;Hunan Research Academy of Environment Sciences, Changsha 410004, China;College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China;Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, China;College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China;Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, China;College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China;Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, China;College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China;Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, China;College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China;Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, China;College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China;Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, China;College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China;Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, China
Abstract:Soil contamination of arsenic pollution has become a severely environmental issue, while soil leaching is an efficient method for remediation of arsenic-contaminated soil. In this study, batch tests were primarily conducted to select optimal mixture leaching combination. Firstly, five conventional reagents were selected and combined with each other. Secondly, the fractions were analyzed before and after the tests. Finally, to explore the feasibility of mixed leaching, three soils with different arsenic pollution levels were used to compare the leaching effect. Comparing with one-step washing, the two-step sequential washing with different reagents increased the arsenic removal efficiency. These results showed that the mixture of 4 h 0.5 mol ·L-1 NaOH+ 4 h 0.1 mol ·L-1 EDTA was found to be practicable, which could enhance the removal rate of arsenic from 66.67% to 91.83%, and the concentration of arsenic in soil was decreased from 186 mg ·kg-1 to 15.2 mg ·kg-1. Furthermore, the results indicated that the distribution of fractions of arsenic in soil changed apparently after mixture leaching. Leaching process could significantly reduce the available contents of arsenic in soil. Moreover, the mixture of 0.5 mol ·L-1 NaOH+ 0.1 mol ·L-1 EDTA could well decrease the arsenic concentration in aluminum-type soils, while the mixture of 0.5 mol ·L-1 OX+ 0.5 mol ·L-1 NaOH could well decrease the arsenic concentration in iron-type soils.
Keywords:arsenic-contaminated  soil  remediation  mixture leaching  fraction
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号