首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Warm glow from green power: Evidence from Australian electricity consumers
Institution:3. Resources for the Future, USA;4. Beihang University, China;1. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, United States;2. Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States;3. Sanford School of Public Policy & Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, United States;4. Institute of Water Policy, National University of Singapore, Singapore;5. Department of Economics, Duke University, United States;1. Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg, Box 640, SE-40530, Gothenburg, Sweden;2. Resources for the Future, 1616 P St., NW, Washington, DC, 20036, USA;3. School of Applied Economics, Renmin University of China, China;4. School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China;1. School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester, United Kingdom;2. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, United States;3. Division of Economics and Business, Colorado School of Mines, United States;4. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, United States
Abstract:Green electricity products are increasingly made available to consumers in many countries in order to address a number of environmental and social concerns. Most of the literature on this green electricity market focuses on consumers’ characteristics and product attributes that could affect participation. However, the contribution of this environmental consumerism to the overall environmental good does not depend on participation alone. The real impact relies on market participation for green consumers (the proportion of green consumers) combined with the level of green consumption intensity – the commitment levels, or proportion of consumption that is green. We design an online interface that closely mimics the real market decision environment for electricity consumers in Western Australia and use an error component model to analyze consumers’ choice of green electricity products and their commitment levels. We show that product attributes have limited impact on the choice of green products; however, there is still great potential for better participation by improving the design of green electricity programs. When green products are selected, most respondents select the minimum commitment possible, and this is insensitive to the premium being charged on green power, suggesting that we are largely observing a buy-in ‘warm glow’ for carbon mitigation.
Keywords:Green electricity  Choice modeling  Error Components Model  Warm glow
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号