首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

空气移动监测车仪器与空气自动站仪器的比对分析
引用本文:邢梦林,李艳玲,郑作杰.空气移动监测车仪器与空气自动站仪器的比对分析[J].环境科学与管理,2008,33(9):127-129.
作者姓名:邢梦林  李艳玲  郑作杰
作者单位:1. 河南省环境监测中心站,河南,郑州,450004;河南理工大学,资源环境学院,河南,焦作,454003
2. 河南财经学院统计学系,河南,郑州,450002
3. 河南省环境监测中心站,河南,郑州,450004
摘    要:河南省环境监测中心站利用空气移动监测车仪器对辖区内4家公司空气自动站的仪器进行比对,得出了空气移动监测车仪器与空气自动站仪器的SO2、NO2相对误差分别为:4.4%、-8.7%,仪器之间重复性和一致性均较好,由相关性检验得出,空气移动监测车仪器与4家公司空气自动站仪器比对数据相关性显著,为利用空气移动监测车仪器对空气自动站仪器进行质量控制和质量保证提供了借鉴意义。

关 键 词:空气移动监测车仪器  空气自动站仪器  比对分析

The Comparisons of Atmosphere Mobile Monitoring Instruments and Fixing Sub-Station Instruments
Xing Menglin,Li Yanling,Zheng Zuojie.The Comparisons of Atmosphere Mobile Monitoring Instruments and Fixing Sub-Station Instruments[J].Environmental Science and Management,2008,33(9):127-129.
Authors:Xing Menglin  Li Yanling  Zheng Zuojie
Institution:Xing Menglin, Li Yanling ,Zheng Zuojie ( 1. Henan Environmental Monitoring Center, Zhengzhou 450004, China ; 2. Department of Resource & Environment, Henan Pzlytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China ; 3. Henan University of Finance and Economics Henan, Zhengzhou 450002, China)
Abstract:The comparisons of Atmosphere auto- monitoring station instrument of four companies in Henan Province between atmosphere mobile monitoring car instruments are performed. The results show that the RE(relative error) of SO2 and NO2 from atmosphere mobile monitoring ear instruments and fixing sub - station instruments is 4.4% , - 8. 7% respectively, and good linear relation is appeared between instruments. It is important that the quality control and assurance of fixing sub - station instruments are exeeuled by atmosphere mobile moniloring ear instruments.
Keywords:atmosphere mobile monitoring car instrument  atmosphere auto- monitoring station instrument  comparisons
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号