Assessment of Dry Sorbent Emission Control Technologies Part I. Fundamental Processes

The utility and industrial sectors continue to come under pressure from both national and local regulatory groups to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions. With a trend in the utility industry for life extension, retrofit technologies are likely to play an important role in any SO₂ emission reduction strategy. Potential retrofit technologies include, singly and in combination: coal switching or cleaning, wet or dry FGD, conversion to fluidized bed, and dry sorbent injection. The diversity within the utility industry in terms of unit size, unit age, fuel use, financial base, and geographic location dictates the need for a variety of technologies to address SO₂ emission control. Dry injection processes involving the injection of dry powders into either the furnace or post-furnace region offer the potential for low capital cost retrofitable technologies. However, compared to wet FGD processes, the dry calcium based processes will likely have lower SO₂ removal efficiencies and may pose more plant-wide integration issues that need to be addressed from both an applications and R&D perspective.

This paper provides a critical assessment of dry injection technologies, in two parts. Part 1 focuses on sorbent processes and science. An assessment of the different dry sorbent processes and the effect of process parameters is provided. Emphasis is placed on process limitations and potential avenues to enhance SO₂ removal. Part 2 will deal with applications of the technology, addressing cost, scale-up, and integration issues.

Much of the data included in this paper was presented at the 1986 Joint Symposium on Dry SO₂ and Simultaneous SO₂/NO_x Control Technologies, sponsored by the Electric Power Research Institute and the Environmental Protection Agency and held in June 1986. This paper provides both an overview and an evaluation of the technology, based largely on our analysis of the data and interpretations discussed at this symposium.