Remedial Options for Leaking Underground Storage Tanks |
| |
| Authors: | Mary E McLearn Michael J Miller Paul T Kostecki Edward J Calabrese Lynne M Preslo Wendell Suyama |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Electric Power Research Institute , Palo Alto , California , USA;2. University of Massachusetts , Amherst , Massachusetts , USA;3. Roy F. Weston, Inc. , Concord , California , USA;4. Southern California Edison Co. , Rosemead , California , USA |
| |
| Abstract: | Remedial options for leaking underground storage tanks were investigated in a joint project of the Electric Power Research Institute and the Underground Storage Tank Committee of the Utility Solid Waste Activities Group. Both existing and emerging technologies were examined. Thirteen remedial techniques were identified and initially characterized as in situ or non-in situ. In situ methods include volatilization, biodegradation, leaching and chemical reaction, vitrification, passive remediation, and isolation or containment. Non-in situ techniques include land treatment, thermal treatment, asphalt incorporation, solidification and stabilization, groundwater extraction and treatment, chemical extraction, and excavation. Soil and groundwater remediation problems have many site-specific considerations which must be considered in choosing an appropriate remedial option; these include cleanup goals, site and contaminant characteristics, cost, exposure pathways, and others. Appropriate remedial techniques are chosen by assessing technical, implementational, environmental and economic considerations of each available option to achieve the desired cleanup goal at the specified site. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
