首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

车用钛酸锂电池生命周期评价
引用本文:殷仁述,杨沿平,杨阳,陈志林.车用钛酸锂电池生命周期评价[J].中国环境科学,2018,38(6):2371-2381.
作者姓名:殷仁述  杨沿平  杨阳  陈志林
作者单位:湖南大学, 汽车车身先进设计制造国家重点实验室, 湖南 长沙 410082
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(071173072);中国工程院咨询专题项目(2015-XZ-036-05-01);湖南省工业支撑计划项目(2015GK3011)
摘    要:为评估车用钛酸锂(LTO)电池对能源、环境与资源的影响,构建了包括重制与二次使用阶段在内的车用锂电池全生命周期评价模型,以某款国产纯电动客车用钛酸锂电池包为评价对象,计算得出每kW·h钛酸锂电池全生命周期的总能量消耗(CED)、全球变暖潜值(GWP)和不可再生矿产资源耗竭潜值(ADP(e))分别为2.80×104MJ、1.86×103kg CO2eq.以及4.77×10-3kg Sbeq.其全生命周期CED与GWP主要与两个使用阶段中由电池充放电效率引起的能量损耗相关,生产阶段GWP主要来源于正负极材料、铝制材料和N-甲基吡咯烷酮.基于全生命周期存储-释放每MJ能量的视角,发现二次使用可显著降低电池全生命周期GWP;与已有研究中其他锂电池对比可知LTO电池生产阶段GWP最低.

关 键 词:生命周期评价  钛酸锂  能量消耗  全球变暖潜值  资源耗竭潜值  
收稿时间:2017-11-04

Life cycle assessment of the lithium titanate batteries used for electric vehicles
YIN Ren-shu,YANG Yan-ping,YANG Yang,CHEN Zhi-lin.Life cycle assessment of the lithium titanate batteries used for electric vehicles[J].China Environmental Science,2018,38(6):2371-2381.
Authors:YIN Ren-shu  YANG Yan-ping  YANG Yang  CHEN Zhi-lin
Institution:State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
Abstract:In order to evaluate the impacts on energy, environment and resources arose from the lithium titanate batteries used on electric vehicles, firstly a life cycle assessment model for the Li-ion batteries were established, which included the re-purposing and second-use stages. Then a lithium titanate battery pack made by a domestic enterprise, which was used on an all-electric city bus, was chosen as the study case. And its life cycle CED (cumulative energy demand), GWP (global warming potential) and ADP(e) (abiotic depletion potential for elements), as the three major indicators of impacts, were calculated. The results showed that the CED, GWP and ADP(e) for every kilo-watt hour capacity of the battery pack in its life cycle were 2.8×104MJ, 1.86×103kg CO2eq. and 4.77×10-3kg Sbeq. respectively. It was found that the energy loss due to the battery efficiency in both use stages had played the key role in battery's life cycle GWP, while GWP of the producing stage mostly came from the embedded greenhouse gas emissions of raw materials such as the cathode and anode materials, aluminum parts and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone. From the perspective of the energy stored and delivered in its life cycle, the LTO battery's GWP per every mega-Joule would decrease significantly with the second-life usage, and GWP of its producing stage is the lowest among all of the Li-ion batteries in the comparison with previous studies.
Keywords:life cycle assessment  lithium titanate batteries  energy demand  global warming potential  abiotic depletion potential  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国环境科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号