首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

燃煤电厂烟气一次PM2.5控制技术的综合评估
引用本文:邓双,孙现伟,束韫,李博,郭凤艳,张凡.燃煤电厂烟气一次PM2.5控制技术的综合评估[J].中国环境科学,2018,38(3):1157-1164.
作者姓名:邓双  孙现伟  束韫  李博  郭凤艳  张凡
作者单位:1. 中国环境科学研究院, 北京 100012;2. 环境基准和风险评估国家重点实验室, 北京 100012;3. 广州纤维产品检测研究院, 广东 广州 511400
基金项目:国家科技支撑计划项目(2014BAC23B00);环境保护公益性行业科研专项(201309072)
摘    要:以燃煤电厂烟气颗粒物控制技术或组合为研究对象,在文献调研和专家问卷调查基础上,针对燃煤电厂一次PM2.5排放特征,构建了包含环境、经济和技术三方面共16项四个层次的评价指标体系;采用模糊综合法对7种颗粒物控制技术及其组合开展了综合评估.结果表明:在综合分析或着重环境性能的情况下,7种单一或组合控制技术的优先顺序为:低低温静电除尘配高频电源+湿式静电除尘≈静电除尘配高频电源+湿式静电除尘 > 电袋复合除尘 > 静电除尘+湿式静电除尘 > 袋式除尘 > 静电除尘 > 电凝并+静电除尘.若优先考虑经济因素,静电除尘为最优选择;优先考虑技术性能则袋式除尘为最优选择.

关 键 词:燃煤电厂  一次PM2.5  技术评估  层次分析法  模糊综合评价法  
收稿时间:2017-08-08

Comprehensive assessment of primary PM2.5 control technologies for coal-fired power plants
DENG Shuang,SUN Xian-wei,SHU Yun,LI Bo,GUO Feng-yan,ZHANG Fan.Comprehensive assessment of primary PM2.5 control technologies for coal-fired power plants[J].China Environmental Science,2018,38(3):1157-1164.
Authors:DENG Shuang  SUN Xian-wei  SHU Yun  LI Bo  GUO Feng-yan  ZHANG Fan
Institution:1. Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China;2. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, China;3. Guangzhou Fibre Product Testing and Research Institute, Guangzhou 511400, China
Abstract:The object of this study is the evaluation of coal-fired power plant flue gas particulate control technologies or their combinations.According to the literature and the expert questionnaire surveys,an assessment model with sixteen evaluation indexes regarding environment,economy and technology was constructed to investigate the primary PM2.5 emission behaviors from coal-fired power plants.Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to conducted an assessment for seven coal-fired power plant flue gas particulate control technologies or their combinations.The results showed that the order of priority based on a comprehensive analysis or considering environment is:low-temperature electrostatic precipitation with high-frequency power + wet electrostatic precipitation ≈ electrostatic precipitation with high frequency power + wet electrostatic precipitation > electrostatic-bag precipitation > electrostatic precipitation + wet electrostatic precipitation > bag precipitation > electrostatic precipitation > electrostatic coagulation precipitation.The Electrostatic precipitation could be the best option if considering economics.Otherwise,the bag precipitation was the best if considering technology.
Keywords:coal-fired power plant  PM2  5  technology assessment  analytic hierarchy process  fuzzy comprehensive analysis method  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国环境科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号