Experimental evidence that bright coloration is not important for territory defense in purple martins |
| |
Authors: | Bridget J. Stutchbury |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Biology, Yale University, 06511 New Haven, CT, USA;(2) Present address: Department of Biology, York University, M3J 1P3 North York, Ontario, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | Summary I tested the hypothesis that bright breeding plumage in territorial males acts as a badge of fighting ability or aggressive motivation to intimidate intruders. Territorial male purple martins (Progne subis) whose iridescent blue plumage was lightened to mimic the appearance of subadult males did not suffer an increase in intruder pressure or loss of territory compared with control males. Bright plumage color itself did not deter intruders and was not important for successful territory defense. Furthermore, a bright coloration of owners was not associated with an increased level of aggression toward intruders. Results from parallel studies on this species suggest that bright coloration is important in territory acquisition. The effectiveness of badges of fighting ability and aggressive motivation in territory defense is limited by whether intruders benefit from assessing these traits in owners. Differences in signaling systems between species are due in part to differences in floater tactics and the mode of territory acquisition. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|