Territory size and defendability in primates |
| |
| Authors: | C Lowen R I M Dunbar |
| |
| Institution: | (1) Department of Chemistry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA;(2) Department of Anthropology, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT London, UK;(3) Present address: Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, 147, L69 3BX Liverpool, UK |
| |
| Abstract: | Mitani and Rodman (1979) showed that a simple measure of the defendability of the range area could differentiate fairly successfully between territorial and non-territorial species of primates. Their analysis has, however, been much criticised on the grounds that it considered only the day journey length and the diameter of the range area. We develop a number of more realistic indices of territory defendability that take into account both the length of the boundary to be defended and the detection distance as well as linear measures of range size. These indices (a) discriminate between territorial and non-territorial species more successfully than the Mitani-Rodman index and (b) allow the results to be extended to species which do not forage in cohesive groups. However, our results suggest that the Mitani-Rodman analysis was in many ways correct. |
| |
| Keywords: | Territoriality Mitani-Rodman index Gas model Primates |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
