首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Use of sustainability appraisal by English planning inspectors and judges
Institution:1. Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario del Sureste, Arganda del Rey, Madrid, España;2. Centro de Salud Soto del Real, Soto del Real, Madrid, España;2. National Engineering Laboratory for High Speed Railway Construction, Changsha, 410075, China;1. Laboratory of Environmental and Urban Economics, École Polytechnique Fédérale Lausanne, BP 2137 (Bâtiment BP), Station 16, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland;2. UCL Energy Institute, University College London, 14 Upper Wolburn Place, London WC1H, United Kingdom
Abstract:This article considers how sustainability appraisals (SA — an English form of SEA that also considers social and economic issues) are treated at the end of the plan-making process: by planning inspectors who review plans before they are adopted, and by judges in the case of legal challenge to plans and their SAs. It briefly describes the role of inspectors and judges, and how their decisions influence SA. It presents the conclusions of 81 planning inspectors' reports about local authority development plans and their SAs, including three cases where inspectors required further SA information and reasons given by inspectors for not challenging the legal adequacy of other SAs. The three main successful English legal challenges to SA are then summarised. Planning inspectors seemed prone, until recently, to not challenge even quite poor quality SAs. This seems to be changing in the wake of recent court judgements, and in turn is affecting planners' SA practice. However it is unclear whether these changes will affect only the procedural aspects of SA or also planners' and inspectors' ‘hearts and minds’.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号